Can someone who has noticed the E-M5 shutter shock issues see if firmware 1.5 has any beneficial effect on reducing it? The update notice doesn't mention it explicitly, but since they did some reworking of how IS is handled, here's hoping...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No change at all with 75 1.8 at 1/100.
Disappointed.
That is exactly the same reasoning that Panasonic (Canadian pages) uses with OIS, have it in the mode where it is off when at half press and starts to act only at full press for best results.Whoever tests this should test two conditions:
- IS on shutter half-press ON = IS can reach its physical limit on some sides, especially if the camera has been paned before taking the shot.
- IS on shutter half-press OFF = IS will start from its center position and thus has room to move to all sides when the shot is taken.
Unfortunately, Panasonic has abandoned giving the users (of M43 as well as compact models) the option to utilize "OIS, Mode 2" since around the time that the GH2 was released (now "ON/OFF").That is exactly the same reasoning that Panasonic (Canadian pages) uses with OIS, have it in the mode where it is off when at half press and starts to act only at full press for best results.Whoever tests this should test two conditions:
- IS on shutter half-press ON = IS can reach its physical limit on some sides, especially if the camera has been paned before taking the shot.
- IS on shutter half-press OFF = IS will start from its center position and thus has room to move to all sides when the shot is taken.
https://panasonic.ca/english/audiovideo/camerascamcorders/digitalstill/megaOIS.asp
Great, thanks for the report. I'll try ASAP. If it's improved with FW 1.5, I will not sell the 12-50hmm, I've shot around 30 frames using the 12-50 kit and 75-300 in and around the house and garden this evening. The majority in the 1/20th - 1/125th range and haven't seen any sign of blurring.
Not confirmation as there is too small a sample but its looking promising
The 3rd posted image looks notably worse (not better) to my eyes. Have a close look at the sign.kelly15 wrote:
View attachment 12822
View attachment 12823
View attachment 12824
Able to post some photos.
One at 1/500 and v. 1.2( no problem)
One at 1/100 and v. 1.2(big problem)
One at 1/100 and v.1.5(apparently lesss problem)