Greg Gebhardt
Forum Pro
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
--Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
--Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
Greg Gebhardt wrote:
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
My question is: Why did anyone expect it to realistically be otherwise?I think many of us who have been using a prosumer cam for a couple
of years have been expecting some revolutionary noise improvement
from the small 2/3" sensor in the latest round of digicams. It
doesn't seem to be happening!
It will only be an issue for those who continue to expect it to perform differently than the previous two or three generations of camera, as far as noise is concerned. It can be easily argued and demonstrated that even the old F505V performs in the area of noise very similar to current Cyber-shots. There really are no surprises here. A difference of 1um or so doesn't make a huge difference noise-wise.My guess is that noise will be an issue.
2 or 3 years ago many more users would look past the noise and be
happy with the performance. Now many of us are expecting
(requiring?) better.
My guess is that if you are not happy with the noise in the A1, you
won't be happy with the noise in the 828. One can only guess though
as Sony is the only major manufacturer that has announced a
prosumer camera but still has not made a sample available.
Maybe that (noise) is why many of us prosumer users are likely
headed for a DSLR in our future, like it or not. I am still going
to hold onto some realistic hope for the 828 though...
Paul
Greg Gebhardt wrote:
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
--Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
--Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
--You need to be honest with yourself. You are drawn to the A1 for
the same reasons I am. It is the total package and not just the
signal to noise ratio in the image. It is the complete controls,
the new focus system, the anti-shake. These things are very
difficult to ignore.
How could I not do what you want! OK![a light shines from the clouds]
"Greg, this is God talking. Wait for the reviews on 828 and A1,
look especially for details on noise and AF performance. THEN you
WILL know what to do."
BOooMM!!!!!
--[Sorry if this offended anyone, not my intention...]
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
--steve
Not real happy with the Minolta A1 images.
I need a sign to guide me!
--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida