There was a thread in the EOS R Talk Forum a few weeks ago discussing the lack of EVF on the R50V. It prompted me to look into the R50V in a bit more detail. I found the form factor quite appealing as it reminded me of the M6 I've been using for some time now - I have to wear progressive eye glasses and can never get on with a viewfinder, optical nor electronic. And, it seems to be about the same size and weight as the M6ii.
The R50V is a video-orientated camera and, whilst it can be used for photos, some reviewers commented that it is not that suitable for photos as it lacks some dials and buttons more sited to a photo-orientated camera.
Sigma and Tamron now offer a range of credible lenses for APSC R cameras and a photo-orientated R (an R50P, or even an R10P) would be quite compelling, at least for me. The grip would probably need to be bigger than on the R50V and that might mean fingers getting squeezed against the lenses.
The R50V is a video-orientated camera and, whilst it can be used for photos, some reviewers commented that it is not that suitable for photos as it lacks some dials and buttons more sited to a photo-orientated camera.
Sigma and Tamron now offer a range of credible lenses for APSC R cameras and a photo-orientated R (an R50P, or even an R10P) would be quite compelling, at least for me. The grip would probably need to be bigger than on the R50V and that might mean fingers getting squeezed against the lenses.