Twin Macro Flash vs Single Speedlight

Twin Macro Flash vs Single Speedlight


  • Total voters
    0

noptc

New member
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I want to know what are your opinions for doing handheld insect macro photography. Do you guys prefer twin flash setup like KX-800 with a diffuser OR single speedlight with concave diffuser

Twin Flash with Diffuser

Twin Flash with Diffuser



Single Speedlight with Concave diffuser

Single Speedlight with Concave diffuser
 
Flash diffuser works best for me, everyone has different methods.
 
I’m not sure which would give the best results in ideal conditions, probably the twin head, but I rarely have ideal conditions and the twin head looks too complex for me, so you can work out what I voted for
 
I'm not a fan of the "nun's hood" style of diffusers. First, in many situations the surrounding tree trunk, twigs, brush, etc. interferes with getting a desired angle, or even getting close enough. Second, the light is relatively uniform, which, in many cases, is convenient, but not always the most interesting, and totally prevents creating any strong side or back light. But for many, it's a simple and practical solution.

Photos below show the type of flash+ diffuser I use, which is usually attached to a bracket with some type of magic arm and/or ball head so that I can position the light wherever I wish, and for what I think is best for each subject. I believe this makes for a more three-dimensional illumination style, with subtle shadows not possible with the big hood diffusers. This is the type of system macro photographers used for years until the hood-style became available a few years ago.

As for a twin-flash setup, the example shown by the OP looks terribly cumbersome, and doesn't look practical for anything except low magnification shots of flowers. Modern twin flash setups are much more compact than shown in that example, and in fact, allow attaching even more than two flash heads. The position of each head can be placed anywhere around the ring. Importantly, the power of each head can be controlled independently, so some "shape" can be provided to the light with the results being not too flat and uniform. For sure, the flash heads should have a diffuser to increase the size of the head (see photo below).

Lester Lefkowitz, author of The Manual of Close-Up and Macro Photography, Volumes I & II

www.MacroPhotographer.net



 Diffuser is made from foamcore assembled with a hot glue gun.  Diffuser face is a kitchen paper towel. I have since shortened the wood handle to get the diffuser closer to the lens.

Diffuser is made from foamcore assembled with a hot glue gun. Diffuser face is a kitchen paper towel. I have since shortened the wood handle to get the diffuser closer to the lens.



Variation using a magic arm

Variation using a magic arm



Another variation

Another variation



Here's what it looks like in the field.  Arrow points to subject; results shown in next photo below.

Here's what it looks like in the field. Arrow points to subject; results shown in next photo below.



Photographed with the rig directly above.

Photographed with the rig directly above.



Another subject using the same flash rig.

Another subject using the same flash rig.

My twin-flash setup .  Diffuse on left is homemade, right is commercial. This rig made photo below.

My twin-flash setup . Diffuse on left is homemade, right is commercial. This rig made photo below.



Leaf-cutter ants made using twin-flash, above.

Leaf-cutter ants made using twin-flash, above.

This is a technique I use a lot;  allows me to position the flash anywhere I like.  Holding the camera in one hand is okay, since the flash freezes any motion.  Being a photographer, I was fortunate to have been born with five arms.

This is a technique I use a lot; allows me to position the flash anywhere I like. Holding the camera in one hand is okay, since the flash freezes any motion. Being a photographer, I was fortunate to have been born with five arms.



Conventional shot of a mushroom with diffused flash ON the camera.

Conventional shot of a mushroom with diffused flash ON the camera.



Holding the flash off camera, above and slightly behind the mushroom.

Holding the flash off camera, above and slightly behind the mushroom.
 
Where have you been! I have been looking for this dual light vs 1 light explanation...thank you appreciate your in depth explaination.
 
Mr. Lefkowitz pretty well covered it. I looked at some of his work that he linked in another post. Superb. I couldn't vote on this post because those items the OP showed look kind of bulky to me. I guess if used at home in the yard, or near the car while out somewhere, they might be ok, but for out walking around in the woods they might be bothersome. An alternative could be just a flash with small diffuser and a PC cord. Here is a photo of a small Kodak I used to have, connected to a flash with a coiled PC cord.

b6108ab3cd4841d4bf5bf8a439d0b0e3.jpg


The flash can be positioned in many different ways to light the subject. In the photo of Mr. Lefkowitz, with the "5 arms", I didn't see a cord, so I guess his flash was remotely activated. Similar situation--flash can be held in various positions.

That is an older flash, with a trigger voltage much more than 5 or 6 volts, but that Kodak z7590 is protected up to 500 v. That model camera has a PC socket, and was a big reason I bought it, many years ago. It is rated at only 5 mpx, but is a good camera. Mine had a major malfunction while out on a hike, so that was the end of it. That is why I usually carried two cameras. I got a lot of use out of it. Having a PC socket enables the user to attach an external flash, for various uses. It is not much extra to carry on a hike, or short walk in some woods. This should work ok for bugs, with enough diffusion, and proper settings on the camera and flash.
 
I've used both style, I feel like twin flash give me this creativity and able to go through wierd angles. These are some photo I tested with it.



b035b3b2f5ba464cbc0cbc323776ad58.jpg




9647bd84310b4c17b750b83b162410dd.jpg




48f2808e1e754849bf388bca4da561c8.jpg
 
I have used both types, mainly the twin flash only because I bought it years ago with a Canon MP-e65 Marco lens. You can control power on each head and it worked great but does have limitations. Canon Macro Twin flash. I don’t use it often enough tho. Works fine in studio and can be setup with other flashes in slave mode.
 
Sir Lefkowitz, if I am doing macro session, do you recommend bringing 2nd lenses like 100-400 along? or it will be a dead weight?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top