4K video settings for "everyday video?"

PLShutterbug

Veteran Member
Messages
6,667
Solutions
11
Reaction score
10,670
Location
US
Hi all -

I will be using my Z8 and Z 180-600 to shoot video of my pilot-in-training grandson taking off on a solo flight this morning, from the end of the runway at our local field. I don't do much video and all the settings for it have me a bit nervous. I've shot some before and found that I didn't have all the acronyms installed on my Windows 11 PC to do fancy editing. I just want a record - this isn't for commercial purposes.

What video file type do y'all recommend?

I think I'll stick to 3840x2160/30p for this, with a 1/60s shutter speed.

Video quality (N-RAW) - Normal?

I'll use the FX image area.

What about "Extended oversampling?" On, or off?

I will have ISO, exposure settings and white balance set to manual settings for continuity.

Picture control - for stills I usually have this set to Standard. Make sense in video?

Active-D Lighting? Normal?

I'll be using auto-focus, I think with the focus mode set to Airplane. I'll play with that with other aircraft as we wait for him to take off.

I'll be shooting from a tripod. Normally I leave VR on for stills. Turn it off for video?

I don't have an external microphone setup so there's no point discussing audio.

What about doing basic cuts afterwards in software? Is there a good open-source video editor available?

Any other thoughts?

TIA.
 
I would not use raw in your situation. I would just use h265 10bit. STD color profile.

Yes to extended oversampling.

The rest of your settings will be fine.

As for VR for video, yes it works with video. I would definitely set it to sports though, as you will likely be panning with the plane.

For an open source editor, I am aware of shotcut https://shotcut.org/ but I've never used it. Black Majic Design offers a free (but not open source) copy of DaVinci Resolve that is a very feature rich nonlinear editor. But it has a learning curve, as there is a lot one can do with it.
 
Last edited:
I would not use raw in your situation. I would just use h265 10bit. STD color profile.

Yes to extended oversampling.

The rest of your settings will be fine.

As for VR for video, yes it works with video. I would definitely set it to sports though, as you will likely be panning with the plane.

For an open source editor, I am aware of shotcut https://shotcut.org/ but I've never used it. Black Majic Design offers a free (but not open source) copy of DaVinci Resolve that is a very feature rich nonlinear editor. But it has a learning curve, as there is a lot one can do with it.
Thanks for the quick response, Suntan.

RAW: Right. There are two settings involved here: "Video file type" and "Video quality (N-RAW)". I forgot to write that I figured the right video file type setting for me is either H.265 (MOV) or H.264 (MP4). The RAW question was because of that extra Video Quality (N-RAW) menu setting, but you make it appear that the Video Quality setting only applies to N-RAW video file types.

When I choose H.265 10-bit, I notice that the menu help says "This format is for video that will be edited on a high-performance computer." What is the general definition of "high performance" here? A Cray? Or will my 13th-generation Intel Core i7-13700 with 64GB RAM and GeForce RTX 3060 do the job?
 
With the flight today, you don't have any time to do test videos and to try editing them. "no pressure!"

Perhaps a simple H.265 .mov at 30 fps, 2160P (4K) would be good for the flight videos.

Note that this is likely close to 1 GB per minute of video. How big is your card?

~~~

A bright, sunny day for the flight video: I don't know the best exposure methods. I switched my Z6 iii into Auto and it did a reasonable exposure, but it set the shutter speeds to widely varied ranges , from 1/30 up to 1/1000 in the bright scenes.

~~~

I experimented with the free version of DaVinci. It kind of worked on my very old laptop, but was extremely laggy and not practical at all. My 3 year old desktop, with Intel I7-10700 and GeForce RTX 2070 super was fast enough to work well.

It's a big learning curve that I struggled with, and finally quit experimenting with. I'd like something less complex than this.
 
Last edited:
I would not use raw in your situation. I would just use h265 10bit. STD color profile.

Yes to extended oversampling.

The rest of your settings will be fine.

As for VR for video, yes it works with video. I would definitely set it to sports though, as you will likely be panning with the plane.

For an open source editor, I am aware of shotcut https://shotcut.org/ but I've never used it. Black Majic Design offers a free (but not open source) copy of DaVinci Resolve that is a very feature rich nonlinear editor. But it has a learning curve, as there is a lot one can do with it.
Thanks for the quick response, Suntan.

RAW: Right. There are two settings involved here: "Video file type" and "Video quality (N-RAW)". I forgot to write that I figured the right video file type setting for me is either H.265 (MOV) or H.264 (MP4). The RAW question was because of that extra Video Quality (N-RAW) menu setting, but you make it appear that the Video Quality setting only applies to N-RAW video file types.

When I choose H.265 10-bit, I notice that the menu help says "This format is for video that will be edited on a high-performance computer." What is the general definition of "high performance" here? A Cray? Or will my 13th-generation Intel Core i7-13700 with 64GB RAM and GeForce RTX 3060 do the job?
H265 is a more efficient compression codec than H264. Allowing for a higher quality video that takes less space.

As for editing, a 3060 based computer will be able to edit 4K fine.
 
With the flight today, you don't have any time to do test videos and to try editing them. "no pressure!"

Perhaps a simple H.265 .mov at 30 fps, 2160P (4K) would be good for the flight videos.

Note that this is likely close to 1 GB per minute of video. How big is your card?

~~~

A bright, sunny day for the flight video: I don't know the best exposure methods. I switched my Z6 iii into Auto and it did a reasonable exposure, but it set the shutter speeds to widely varied ranges , from 1/30 up to 1/1000 in the bright scenes.

~~~

I experimented with the free version of DaVinci. It kind of worked on my very old laptop, but was extremely laggy and not practical at all. My 3 year old desktop, with Intel I7-10700 and GeForce RTX 2070 super was fast enough to work well.

It's a big learning curve that I struggled with, and finally quit experimenting with. I'd like something less complex than this.
Ya, I’m already back.

I have a Delkin Power G4 1TB card, so no limits there.

Findings: the camera wanted to control ISO and shutter speed even in M mode with auto-ISO off. Not sure why.

I had AF on AF-F, airplanes, Dynamic Area mode. It found the airplane and stuck on it really well, even with a lot of heat haze. As he climbed out it also stayed on him even to a speck.

I had my Z 180-600 on a gimbal that I just bought. What I thought was really light horizontal panning action wasn’t so light with video. I need to look at that and maybe replace the grease with lighter stuff. Tracking the airplane was fine until it got pretty close, and I lost it a couple of times. This will take some practice.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top