There is nothing there suggesting that it is baked-in. NR has been available as an option for ages for JPEGs.Noise Reduction baked in oh oh - well at least they are admitting they are doing that now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is nothing there suggesting that it is baked-in. NR has been available as an option for ages for JPEGs.Noise Reduction baked in oh oh - well at least they are admitting they are doing that now.
Or, they just do what they do before every 1 series release. This is from 2019 - https://global.canon/en/news/2019/20191024.htmlAt last. . . It looks quite pretty, doesn’t it?
But Canon doesn’t really tell us much. There’s that line about ‘field testing’ it (some to be handed out in Paris, presumably?) which presumably means they’ve got some prototypes ready.
But not production models? They’re ‘aiming for a 2024 release’. . .which sounds like hedging their bets a bit. And it does leave open the possibility it might not really be available until early 2025. I wonder if the later rumours about them running into problems had some truth to them after all? And maybe some suspicions thar this is actually an ‘R1 mkii’ or even an ‘R1 mkiii’ were correct?
They’re really isn’t anything in the way of actual specifications; whether any will leak out in June or July we’ll have to see, but I suspect anyone who gets one in their hands in June/July will also have to have signed a stiff NDA, so we’ll no doubt get more months of speculation and guesswork from the rumour sites. . .
I’m sure this will enthuse a lot of Canon owners who’ll be performing sacrifices to the gods in gratitude that this thing’s actually real at last—three years after it was first thought to be coming—but I don’t know if a ‘development announcement’ like this really cuts it in 2024.
I wonder if Canon got so fed up with the endless speculation and guesswork—let alone people wondering if it would ever arrive—that their hand was forced a bit?
Interestingly, they did the development announcement for the R5. I just found it.Or, they just do what they do before every 1 series release. This is from 2019 - https://global.canon/en/news/2019/20191024.htmlAt last. . . It looks quite pretty, doesn’t it?
But Canon doesn’t really tell us much. There’s that line about ‘field testing’ it (some to be handed out in Paris, presumably?) which presumably means they’ve got some prototypes ready.
But not production models? They’re ‘aiming for a 2024 release’. . .which sounds like hedging their bets a bit. And it does leave open the possibility it might not really be available until early 2025. I wonder if the later rumours about them running into problems had some truth to them after all? And maybe some suspicions thar this is actually an ‘R1 mkii’ or even an ‘R1 mkiii’ were correct?
They’re really isn’t anything in the way of actual specifications; whether any will leak out in June or July we’ll have to see, but I suspect anyone who gets one in their hands in June/July will also have to have signed a stiff NDA, so we’ll no doubt get more months of speculation and guesswork from the rumour sites. . .
I’m sure this will enthuse a lot of Canon owners who’ll be performing sacrifices to the gods in gratitude that this thing’s actually real at last—three years after it was first thought to be coming—but I don’t know if a ‘development announcement’ like this really cuts it in 2024.
I wonder if Canon got so fed up with the endless speculation and guesswork—let alone people wondering if it would ever arrive—that their hand was forced a bit?
This doesn't work in 2024 is just a cliche people keep throwing around. We have nothing to suggest this is detrimental in any way. It's their business model and they think it would work, that is why they do it.
I can only assume either people haven't been around these product cycles long enough, or the collective average memory is very short here
Also, these dev announcements only happen for high end cameras. They likely won't have a prelude to R5 successor announcement. It will just be announced with full specs on the go
Interesting indeed. I do not recall seeing it, which is odd since I have been waiting to upgrade my 5D iv around that time and was holding off not wanting to switch to R at that time. I bought R5 at launch in Aug 2020, so I must have crawled under a rock when this happenedInterestingly, they did the development announcement for the R5. I just found it.Or, they just do what they do before every 1 series release. This is from 2019 - https://global.canon/en/news/2019/20191024.htmlAt last. . . It looks quite pretty, doesn’t it?
But Canon doesn’t really tell us much. There’s that line about ‘field testing’ it (some to be handed out in Paris, presumably?) which presumably means they’ve got some prototypes ready.
But not production models? They’re ‘aiming for a 2024 release’. . .which sounds like hedging their bets a bit. And it does leave open the possibility it might not really be available until early 2025. I wonder if the later rumours about them running into problems had some truth to them after all? And maybe some suspicions thar this is actually an ‘R1 mkii’ or even an ‘R1 mkiii’ were correct?
They’re really isn’t anything in the way of actual specifications; whether any will leak out in June or July we’ll have to see, but I suspect anyone who gets one in their hands in June/July will also have to have signed a stiff NDA, so we’ll no doubt get more months of speculation and guesswork from the rumour sites. . .
I’m sure this will enthuse a lot of Canon owners who’ll be performing sacrifices to the gods in gratitude that this thing’s actually real at last—three years after it was first thought to be coming—but I don’t know if a ‘development announcement’ like this really cuts it in 2024.
I wonder if Canon got so fed up with the endless speculation and guesswork—let alone people wondering if it would ever arrive—that their hand was forced a bit?
This doesn't work in 2024 is just a cliche people keep throwing around. We have nothing to suggest this is detrimental in any way. It's their business model and they think it would work, that is why they do it.
I can only assume either people haven't been around these product cycles long enough, or the collective average memory is very short here
Also, these dev announcements only happen for high end cameras. They likely won't have a prelude to R5 successor announcement. It will just be announced with full specs on the go
https://www.canon.com.au/about-cano...ses/canon-announces-development-of-the-eos-r5
But it was a major shift from DSLRs to mirrorless. There's no guarantee they'll do the development announcement fort the R5II.
Since they are already getting features that would AF based on what the subject is doing, we are almost where the handful of candidates can also be narrowed down to by some algorithm. You shoot at fastest rate possible and get presented with the best X images from the busrt to go through. Someone will be coming for that assistants job soonCompared to the days of higher frame rates and larger buffers so you can sift through and pick out the handful of great images.
Not odd, just a "teaser". The details will be revealed when it is officially launched.Very odd announcement. It's a whole lot of nothing.
I’d be very surprised if it’s less than 45To me, the wording seems clear. Until now people have been using PC software for noise reduction, but the R1 will aim to do that well in-camera to improve SOOC shots and make further software adjustments less necessary.Still eager to hear what you think they are admitting to here? That something that was not done in camera before will now be available in camera? Or did you make some far fetched deductions that they haven't actually said above?Canon implements the image noise reduction function, which has been previously developed and improved as part of the software for PCs, as a camera function to further improve image quality and contribute to user creativity."
Regarding other points that people have made, it was clear with the R3 launch that it was the best they could do at that time, and was not a 1-series replacement, more as an interim step.
But it was pretty close, and I wonder if we will ever see an R3 Mark II? Maybe not. If we do, would it be smaller, like the EOS 3 compared with the EOS 1V?
I get a feeling that Canon are not where they want to be with the R1 in terms of timing, they are behind where they were at this stage with the R3 four years ago.
It will be interesting to see the megapixel count. Maybe it will leak out with the Olympics, as it did with the R3, but maybe not this time.
Sony's most recently released sports camera is only 24MP. It's a safe bet that Canon will do better than that.I’d be very surprised if it’s less than 45It will be interesting to see the megapixel count. Maybe it will leak out with the Olympics, as it did with the R3, but maybe not this time.
If 24MP was enough for your flagship when the competition is 50 and 45 then the R3 would have been the R1 and we’d now be waiting on the R1 mk2. My money’s on the R1 being 45MP or more.Sony's most recently released sports camera is only 24MP. It's a safe bet that Canon will do better than that.I’d be very surprised if it’s less than 45It will be interesting to see the megapixel count. Maybe it will leak out with the Olympics, as it did with the R3, but maybe not this time.
That's some level of errorAdorama lists a few specs, with some level of error (says FF sensor in one place and APS-c in another).
It might also simply mean it will shoot in crop mode and/or use crop lenses?That's some level of errorAdorama lists a few specs, with some level of error (says FF sensor in one place and APS-c in another).
Maybe they are hedging, it has to be one of those
That would make perfect senseIt might also simply mean it will shoot in crop mode and/or use crop lenses?That's some level of errorAdorama lists a few specs, with some level of error (says FF sensor in one place and APS-c in another).
Maybe they are hedging, it has to be one of those
The video also said that Canon is announcing the FIRST FLAGSHIP of the R series.
That's right. Canon's top executives always made it clear that the R3 wasn't their flagship. The R1 goes at the top of the pyramid.The video also said that Canon is announcing the FIRST FLAGSHIP of the R series.

I don't think this was there to dispel, irrespective of what people feel about it. Canon has said on record that R3 is not their flagship as far back as 2021 after R3 was announced. It was an interview with someone at Canon if I recall correctly.The video also said that Canon is announcing the FIRST FLAGSHIP of the R series.
Going back to the flagship conversation of a month ago where the Europeans have ads calling the R3 or R5(don't remember which) a flagship camera. This kinda dispels that, or at least what they're thinking at Canon in Japan?!?