Difference between Fringer EF FX ii and Pro iii for EF Glass

What I can see on B&H is they are both for autofocus use of EF Glass on X mount but there is a $100 difference. I couldn’t find anything using search on the difference.

TIA

Mike
The newer adapter adds an o ring to provide weather resistance and is also a bit smaller.

Morris
 
What I can see on B&H is they are both for autofocus use of EF Glass on X mount but there is a $100 difference. I couldn’t find anything using search on the difference.

TIA

Mike
Pro II - Aperture ring, chrome plated brass mounts on both ends

Pro III - Aperture ring, chrome plated brass mounts on both ends, weather sealing

EF-FX II (not pro) - no aperture ring, lens side mount is chrome plated brass, camera side mount is anodized aluminum

AF capabilities should be identical for all three.
 
What I can see on B&H is they are both for autofocus use of EF Glass on X mount but there is a $100 difference. I couldn’t find anything using search on the difference.

TIA

Mike
Pro II - Aperture ring, chrome plated brass mounts on both ends

Pro III - Aperture ring, chrome plated brass mounts on both ends, weather sealing

EF-FX II (not pro) - no aperture ring, lens side mount is chrome plated brass, camera side mount is anodized aluminum

AF capabilities should be identical for all three.
Much thanks!! I would be using it 95% of the time for interior work so the weather sealing isn’t an issue and I don’t care about the aperture ring.

Thanks again to everyone for the fast replies! Be well.
 
Hello! It's an old post, but I would have a similar question, but getting the pro in the mix. How does it compare to the pro2/3? I'm only interested in its autofocus performance, dont really care about rings and stuff.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top