K-3 Mark III is a Beast

3Percent

Senior Member
Messages
1,741
Reaction score
2,142
(Quite surprising for a gear site/forum that there aren't more user reviews of the K-3 III here. Even more so I suppose that DPReview hasn't completed their final review of the K-3 Mark III. Maybe someone should voluntarily loan them a K-3 Mark III to finish the review up...)

Anyways, with that said...

The Pentax K-3 III is an incredible DSLR that has more useful features, customization, and applications for a photography tool than any other DSLR I can think of. The breadth of its complexity is matched by its capability and it's configurability as a tool- a supremely well executed DSLR for a wide range of photographers.

If you desire the control and customization over how your camera operates, then look no further. The level of customization and control is staggering.

This is a camera that you can literally do any kind of still photography with and not be let down. From its fast mechanical shutter (11/12fps rated to 300,000 shots) and leading edge auto focus system, to it's high resolution mode, and unique Pentax features, it covers everything from action, to studio, to astro photography, and everything in-between.

It's image quality is something we once used to only dream of or joke about for APS-C, and yet it is here. It steps well into the boundaries of full frame image quality in terms of dynamic range and high ISO performance- truly it is impressive for a sensor of this size. It's raw files are so malleable in post production and also free from destructive fixed pattern banding. It's noise grain in the upper ISO range is so pleasant in it's texture, it begs you to shoot high ISO images just to give your images some extra character.

Image quality is still actually useful i.e. within my accepted limits up to 51,200 ISO, and in a real pinch, beyond that up to 204,800 (if you shoot monochome). Impressive to me is that this is even possible with an APS-C sensor, it's really good.

After that, it's emergency settings only, let's face it. Yet it's still amazing to me that you can get discernable subjects even up to ISO 1,600,000.

It's built to the clappers, rock solid, and it can handle any kind of inclimate weather or temperature you can throw at it. You can feel the quality of its construction in every part of its design, this is a camera for people who like high quality made gear. Simple as that.

Ergonomically it's sound and also supremely comfortable to hold and operate. Buttons are large enough and raised enough to operate in any climate, with or with out gloves on. Larger and heavier lenses feel well matched and balanced on it, due in part to its large grip that gives you the reassurance and firm hold you need for all day comfort in the field.

It's optical viewfinder has the largest view (not one of the largest views) of ANY aps-c sized sensor DSLR made, ever. The viewing magnification is very similar to full frame cameras. It's also equipped with a modern translucent LCD overlay so you can customize much of the information you see through it (from various grids, to AF points, even viewfinder illumination, you name it).

Since its introduction, new firmware updates have added a GPS-free astrotracer function (utilizing the sensor movement, version 3), electronic shutter option, new special film simulation modes, and more tweaks to its operation that makes it an even more useful tool. Just when you think it's already got everything plus the kitchen sink, Ricoh/Pentax just adds more.

It's feature list is the incarnate of something only once dreamt up by enthusiasts and professional photographers. It's vast, comprehensive, and useful for a very wide range of photography needs. In addition to being all that, Pentax has some unique items in there like catch-in manual focus (trap focus) and comprehensive exposure control using the twin dials and the green button.

Basically the K-3 Mark III is not only a camera that is ready for any kind of photography out of the box (save for scuba diving photography). It's an amalgam of every step that Pentax has made from all of its DSLR cameras in the past.

It's able to use the oldest lenses of its native K mount with the unique ability to register an aperture setting (despite the oldest K-mount lenses having no electrical contacts), to thoroughly leveraging the most modern lenses in the K-mount. In fact I'd say the K-3 Mark III tends to expose the limitations of some of the rather dated lens designs in Pentax's lineup. The upside though, is that It's future proof in this way as more modern Pentax lenses slowly make their way into the system to play catch up to its capability.

Overall, in its current firmware version, the K-3 Mark III is a modern multi-tool DSLR that keeps up with the pace of current technology (in some ways exceeds the mean) all without abandoning its roots or heritage. This is all contained in a surprisingly compact and lightweight yet supremely rock solid body.

I easily gave it a five star rating and the highest marks for every kind of photography simply because the K-3 Mark III can do them all equally well. It really has no weak points, unless of course you demand 100 megapixels of resolution and 60fps for stills shooting (I'd question a need for either of those from anyone frankly).
 
Last edited:
There are those that have said it’s just an incremental upgrade of the K3II and is way overpriced for what it is. It is NOT an incremental upgrade, it is in another universe. I was hoping for a lower price at release, but do not regret paying full price as an early adopter. I have 29,000 shots on it now, and have gotten many excellent wildlife captures which would have been totally impossible with my K-3. I am hoping for some improved CAF capability in future long lenses, but CAF on my DA* 300/HD 1.4X combo is far faster than on the K-3.
 
There are those that have said it’s just an incremental upgrade of the K3II and is way overpriced for what it is. It is NOT an incremental upgrade, it is in another universe. I was hoping for a lower price at release, but do not regret paying full price as an early adopter. I have 29,000 shots on it now, and have gotten many excellent wildlife captures which would have been totally impossible with my K-3. I am hoping for some improved CAF capability in future long lenses, but CAF on my DA* 300/HD 1.4X combo is far faster than on the K-3.
I concur 100% that it is not an incremental upgrade, and is a giant leap forward.

Unlike the entire DSLR history with Pentax in the past. This camera is a massive upgrade in nearly every single respect and is on the cutting edge of every technology Pentax has developed for their cameras. The only mark against it is video but its obvious that Pentax has no desire to cater to an over crowded video device market.

To me the K-3 Mark III philosophy is clear.

When it was evident that Canon and Nikon were going to bow out of the DSLR business, it was then, finally, that Pentax realized the R/D to develop a much better autofocusing camera, a true pro grade DSLR, would not be wasted. Trying to go up against those two for sports and action work in the DSLR space was pretty much suicide. But since they went mirrorless, it left a gap for DSLR users.

Not only that, but Pentax went full steam on everything else with this camera, not just a camera that could be taken seriously by pros for action work, but also for just about every other aspect.

The only reason that Pentax doesn't get the usual amount of love the other makers get online with reviews, is because they don't have the marketing funds to create shills. Their lens lineup isn't as strong as Canon and Nikon, but it's strong enough to be taken seriously. This camera body, should have been taken MUCH more seriously. It's amazing.

Btw, this coming from someone who has more gear than he should from several manufacturers. :)
 
Nice review, thanks for taking the time. We've been treated to several reviews on the forum from those who purchased early on, and your comments pretty much confirm their comments as well. Very significant camera.

I'm really pleased to have a premium DSLR APS-C choice even though my other APS-C cameras are my "bang around" cameras and do the job for now.

My real hope is that Pentax carry this development into their FF line, and I think they will. I just hope it isn't quite as large and heavy as the current K1, but we'll see about that eventually, won't we....
 
(Quite surprising for a gear site/forum that there aren't more user reviews of the K-3 III here. Even more so I suppose that DPReview hasn't completed their final review of the K-3 Mark III. Maybe someone should voluntarily loan them a K-3 Mark III to finish the review up...)
Yes. DPR had a starter review page for it, but then they took it down & replaced it with a joke of a video review. Don't get me wrong. I really like watching the videos that Chris & Jordan make, but their video doesn't really go into the meat of the K-3III. It gives you a general idea about the K-3III, but not really. It's not going to convince a non-Pentaxian that it's worth it. A thorough written review from the guys at DPR would have been nice, but oh well. The sad thing is that no major camera review sites really gave the K-3III a chance.

Regardless of that, I've seen plenty of YouTube videos on the K-3III, have read a few user reviews, & some lesser known sites have somewhat reviewed it, giving me an overall idea of the camera. It definitely blows all other APS-C DSLR's from anyone. In some cases it can autofocus better than the Nikon D500, due to the subject recognition that the K-3III has. The engineers at Ricoh took a massive leap forward with the K-3III in terms of autofocus performance. The D500 has a much larger buffer, more AF cross points, & a flippy screen, but lacks many of the features in the K-3III, not to mention that the D500 has pretty much been discontinued. There are more fast focusing lens options for the D500, though. Something that the K-3III kind of lacks at the moment.

The 3 things some have found annoying in the K-3III are the small buffer, only 1 card slot that supports UHS-II, & lack of a tilting screen. Maybe the eventual K-3 Mark IV will "fix" those "issues". Those "issues" don't really bother me.

But yeah. I'm not sure if I'll get the K-3III this year or not. I'm still on the fence, given my equipment. My K-3II is barely at about 8,000 actuations. I still have 192,000 to go. That & the newer DA* lenses & PLM lenses have made the K-3II's AF.C a hair more usable. I know exactly what will happen with the K-3II if I get a K-3III, though. It's gonna end up sitting on the shelf. Hahaha! :-P
 
Who needs dpr review if he has this excellent review.
 


But yeah. I'm not sure if I'll get the K-3III this year or not. I'm still on the fence, given my equipment. My K-3II is barely at about 8,000 actuations. I still have 192,000 to go. That & the newer DA* lenses & PLM lenses have made the K-3II's AF.C a hair more usable. I know exactly what will happen with the K-3II if I get a K-3III, though. It's gonna end up sitting on the shelf. Hahaha! :-P
Oh yeah. It's that "built to the clappers" concept that 3percent mentioned. I'm not sure that's a benefit or a liability. Excepting that one solenoid issue, Pentax bodies seem built to last a long long time. Can't trust "failure" as a reason to upgrade. :-)

I took my K20 with the kit zoom off the shelf years ago and gave it to my son. He gave it to his younger sister. His younger sister gave it to her daughter. Her daughter gave it to her younger brother. It has survived several "shoot the dog" contests which is great fun but can get rough at times. It's gotten wet. It's been dropped. The last image I received was from my granddaughter, who is the budding photographer of the family. I'm told it's still working.

 Pollen on the car roof  --  shot with family's unbreakable K20
Pollen on the car roof -- shot with family's unbreakable K20
 
Nice review, thanks for taking the time. We've been treated to several reviews on the forum from those who purchased early on, and your comments pretty much confirm their comments as well. Very significant camera.
My pleasure. The way I see it we should speak up louder when manufacturers do things right, not get quiet and satisfied LOL ;)
I'm really pleased to have a premium DSLR APS-C choice even though my other APS-C cameras are my "bang around" cameras and do the job for now.
Yep something to look forward too in the future maybe perhaps :)
My real hope is that Pentax carry this development into their FF line, and I think they will. I just hope it isn't quite as large and heavy as the current K1, but we'll see about that eventually, won't we....
I would think they would, reasonable expectation.
 
(Quite surprising for a gear site/forum that there aren't more user reviews of the K-3 III here. Even more so I suppose that DPReview hasn't completed their final review of the K-3 Mark III. Maybe someone should voluntarily loan them a K-3 Mark III to finish the review up...)
Yes. DPR had a starter review page for it, but then they took it down & replaced it with a joke of a video review. Don't get me wrong. I really like watching the videos that Chris & Jordan make, but their video doesn't really go into the meat of the K-3III. It gives you a general idea about the K-3III, but not really.
Yeah not really. It's a lot of camera, and it takes time to dissect it and review it properly.
It's not going to convince a non-Pentaxian that it's worth it. A thorough written review from the guys at DPR would have been nice, but oh well. The sad thing is that no major camera review sites really gave the K-3III a chance.
Probably not, true and they damn well should have.
Regardless of that, I've seen plenty of YouTube videos on the K-3III, have read a few user reviews, & some lesser known sites have somewhat reviewed it, giving me an overall idea of the camera. It definitely blows all other APS-C DSLR's from anyone. In some cases it can autofocus better than the Nikon D500, due to the subject recognition that the K-3III has. The engineers at Ricoh took a massive leap forward with the K-3III in terms of autofocus performance. The D500 has a much larger buffer, more AF cross points, & a flippy screen, but lacks many of the features in the K-3III, not to mention that the D500 has pretty much been discontinued. There are more fast focusing lens options for the D500, though. Something that the K-3III kind of lacks at the moment.
Yep the "underground" is doing pretty well with getting the word out about it. And correct on the lenses. Best I found for the money is the 60-250mm f/4, once you are locked on a subject it seems to stay locked very well and communicates with the K3 III quite well. The 55-300mm PLM is more of a travel/pack lens, but it does the job pretty well. Still the choices are very much limited to the likes of C/N systems.
The 3 things some have found annoying in the K-3III are the small buffer, only 1 card slot that supports UHS-II, & lack of a tilting screen. Maybe the eventual K-3 Mark IV will "fix" those "issues". Those "issues" don't really bother me.

But yeah. I'm not sure if I'll get the K-3III this year or not. I'm still on the fence, given my equipment. My K-3II is barely at about 8,000 actuations. I still have 192,000 to go. That & the newer DA* lenses & PLM lenses have made the K-3II's AF.C a hair more usable. I know exactly what will happen with the K-3II if I get a K-3III, though. It's gonna end up sitting on the shelf. Hahaha! :-P
LOL, yeah. I have plenty sitting on the shelf, that's okay too. I'll usually just change the duty of a camera when I replace it with a newer one. Make it a dedicated prime lens camera or something of that nature. Just depends.
 
But yeah. I'm not sure if I'll get the K-3III this year or not. I'm still on the fence, given my equipment. My K-3II is barely at about 8,000 actuations. I still have 192,000 to go. That & the newer DA* lenses & PLM lenses have made the K-3II's AF.C a hair more usable. I know exactly what will happen with the K-3II if I get a K-3III, though. It's gonna end up sitting on the shelf. Hahaha! :-P
Oh yeah. It's that "built to the clappers" concept that 3percent mentioned. I'm not sure that's a benefit or a liability. Excepting that one solenoid issue, Pentax bodies seem built to last a long long time. Can't trust "failure" as a reason to upgrade. :-)
Probably a benefit long term. I have yet to have one Pentax camera go bad on me. Some of mine have been through some sh@$ too LOL.
I took my K20 with the kit zoom off the shelf years ago and gave it to my son. He gave it to his younger sister. His younger sister gave it to her daughter. Her daughter gave it to her younger brother. It has survived several "shoot the dog" contests which is great fun but can get rough at times. It's gotten wet. It's been dropped. The last image I received was from my granddaughter, who is the budding photographer of the family. I'm told it's still working.

Pollen on the car roof -- shot with family's unbreakable K20
Pollen on the car roof -- shot with family's unbreakable K20
That's fantastic. Neat almost "outer worldly" shot there too. I gift cameras too, its amazing the reaction some people have and the value they hold for so long.
 
Thanks for the review !

And thanks for reminding that it's not an incremental update, I'm tired to read that (usually from people who never used a K3III...).
 
I've always said it is a brilliant camera but sadly most people will never discover or realize it.

--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation
N.B. All my Images are Protected by Copyright
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the review !
My pleasure!
And thanks for reminding that it's not an incremental update, I'm tired to read that (usually from people who never used a K3III...).
Must just be old habits, typically that's what the Pentax brand have done in the past (unless you consider the K10D or K5 huge upgrades like the K3/III). But yeah, you have to use it to know.

Honestly my first take using one last year was "Wait, this is a Pentax? It's too fast to be a Pentax!". Kind of messed up my mind for a while. LOL
 
I've always said it is a brilliant camera but sadly most people will never discover or realize it.
I think eventually word of mouth will spread more and more about it. It's a really impressive camera.
 
I concur sir! I have been singing its praises for a while, but your song is just more in tune, and you put it more eloquently than I :)
 
I concur sir! I have been singing its praises for a while, but your song is just more in tune, and you put it more eloquently than I :)
Well that is very kind of you to say, thank you. I too have been a fan of the Mark III for some time now, just finally got around to doing a review here on it.
 
(Quite surprising for a gear site/forum that there aren't more user reviews of the K-3 III here. Even more so I suppose that DPReview hasn't completed their final review of the K-3 Mark III. Maybe someone should voluntarily loan them a K-3 Mark III to finish the review up...)
Yes. DPR had a starter review page for it, but then they took it down & replaced it with a joke of a video review. Don't get me wrong. I really like watching the videos that Chris & Jordan make, but their video doesn't really go into the meat of the K-3III. It gives you a general idea about the K-3III, but not really. It's not going to convince a non-Pentaxian that it's worth it.
Based on your concluding statements it appears Ricoh is also having a hard time convincing Pentaxians it is worth it.
A thorough written review from the guys at DPR would have been nice, but oh well. The sad thing is that no major camera review sites really gave the K-3III a chance.

Regardless of that, I've seen plenty of YouTube videos on the K-3III, have read a few user reviews, & some lesser known sites have somewhat reviewed it, giving me an overall idea of the camera. It definitely blows all other APS-C DSLR's from anyone. In some cases it can autofocus better than the Nikon D500, due to the subject recognition that the K-3III has. The engineers at Ricoh took a massive leap forward with the K-3III in terms of autofocus performance. The D500 has a much larger buffer, more AF cross points, & a flippy screen, but lacks many of the features in the K-3III, not to mention that the D500 has pretty much been discontinued. There are more fast focusing lens options for the D500, though. Something that the K-3III kind of lacks at the moment.
The K3-III is the most advanced APS-C DSLR currently in production. That is the opportunity Ricoh anticipated and that is what they seek to capitalize on. It is time to stop looking over the shoulder and to move on from D500 comparisons or insecurities. It was over 5 years old before the K3-III was even announced and is now discontinued. The bulk of inter systems switching related to that camera has long since occurred, perhaps even before K3-III. Those new to the market are going to compare to current cameras. Ricoh marketing can not be too interested in promoting points of superiority over discontinued models from competitors.
The 3 things some have found annoying in the K-3III are the small buffer, only 1 card slot that supports UHS-II, & lack of a tilting screen. Maybe the eventual K-3 Mark IV will "fix" those "issues". Those "issues" don't really bother me.

But yeah. I'm not sure if I'll get the K-3III this year or not. I'm still on the fence, given my equipment. My K-3II is barely at about 8,000 actuations. I still have 192,000 to go. That & the newer DA* lenses & PLM lenses have made the K-3II's AF.C a hair more usable. I know exactly what will happen with the K-3II if I get a K-3III, though. It's gonna end up sitting on the shelf. Hahaha! :-P
What would it take to convince you AS a Pentaxian? 😀
 
Thanks for the review !
My pleasure!
And thanks for reminding that it's not an incremental update, I'm tired to read that (usually from people who never used a K3III...).
Must just be old habits, typically that's what the Pentax brand have done in the past (unless you consider the K10D or K5 huge upgrades like the K3/III).
In fact personally I switched directly from K100D to K70, so by skeeping all increments in between it seemed a whole new world :-D

Then K3III seemed completely different again yes.
But yeah, you have to use it to know.

Honestly my first take using one last year was "Wait, this is a Pentax? It's too fast to be a Pentax!". Kind of messed up my mind for a while. LOL
 
Thanks for the review !
My pleasure!
And thanks for reminding that it's not an incremental update, I'm tired to read that (usually from people who never used a K3III...).
Must just be old habits, typically that's what the Pentax brand have done in the past (unless you consider the K10D or K5 huge upgrades like the K3/III).
In fact personally I switched directly from K100D to K70, so by skeeping all increments in between it seemed a whole new world :-D

Then K3III seemed completely different again yes.
Having both the K-70 and the K-3iii.... YES!

Doug
 
Thanks for the review !
My pleasure!
And thanks for reminding that it's not an incremental update, I'm tired to read that (usually from people who never used a K3III...).
Must just be old habits, typically that's what the Pentax brand have done in the past (unless you consider the K10D or K5 huge upgrades like the K3/III).
In fact personally I switched directly from K100D to K70, so by skeeping all increments in between it seemed a whole new world :-D
Yep that's a giant leap as well! K70 (now KF) is a solid DSLR.
Then K3III seemed completely different again yes.
But yeah, you have to use it to know.

Honestly my first take using one last year was "Wait, this is a Pentax? It's too fast to be a Pentax!". Kind of messed up my mind for a while. LOL
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top