In an earlier thread, I posted results of manual focusing on a Siemens star with the 38mm XCD on an X2D 100C and a GF 45mm on a GFX 100S. The GFX yielded more accurate results with less scatter.
I was asked to run a test with the same lens on both cameras. I have done so, using the Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4. I set the lens to f/4. My first run with the GFX was with one of my usual focusing setups: red lo peaking, max magnification. I then reduced the magnification to approximately match the XCD magnification, and turned off the peaking.
Here are the stats for all three series, for both horizontal and vertical edges.

MTF50 in cycles per pixel. This is a decent metric for sharpness. Higher is better.
The GFX with peaking is both more accurate and has a lower standard deviation (std) than the X2D with magnification on. But the difference is not as great as before. I think that's because the Otus has a much longer focus throw than the XCD 35.
When I lowered the magnification and turned off peaking on the GFX, I got worse results than with the X2D.
My conclusion is that there's nothing wrong with the X2D's finder resolution. It is probably better than the GFX 100S. But without peaking, critical sharpness will be more elusive than with the GFX 100S.
I see no reason why the X2D can't add peaking in a future firmware release.
Jim
--
blog.kasson.com
I was asked to run a test with the same lens on both cameras. I have done so, using the Zeiss Otus 55mm f/1.4. I set the lens to f/4. My first run with the GFX was with one of my usual focusing setups: red lo peaking, max magnification. I then reduced the magnification to approximately match the XCD magnification, and turned off the peaking.
Here are the stats for all three series, for both horizontal and vertical edges.

MTF50 in cycles per pixel. This is a decent metric for sharpness. Higher is better.
The GFX with peaking is both more accurate and has a lower standard deviation (std) than the X2D with magnification on. But the difference is not as great as before. I think that's because the Otus has a much longer focus throw than the XCD 35.
When I lowered the magnification and turned off peaking on the GFX, I got worse results than with the X2D.
My conclusion is that there's nothing wrong with the X2D's finder resolution. It is probably better than the GFX 100S. But without peaking, critical sharpness will be more elusive than with the GFX 100S.
I see no reason why the X2D can't add peaking in a future firmware release.
Jim
--
the last word the last word - Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.
Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.
blog.kasson.com
