smith-jones
Leading Member
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 306
But is now more like discovering my love for an old Tamron lens.
I have a camera club shoot tonight at a local festival and for various reasons my good lenses are not with me right now so thought i would take these two lenses and have a shoot out between them since they are essentially similar (both 28-80mm fairly slow and have some macro capability).
I use both as manual focus lenses adapted to My A7s.
They each cost me only a few dollars at the charity shop i work at (they were available to customers first).
On the left is a (near) mint Tamron adaptall 28-80 3.5-4.2 (model 27a) that came with a box and case and on the right a Sigma in very good condition AF lens for Pentax 28-80 3.5-5.6.
I would have thought doing a shootout the more modern Sigma might have had the edge but after just ONE comparison look now to get an idea, the old Tamron is light years better so not even going to bother taking the Sigma now.
Besides the Sigma is much harder to focus since it is a designed for AF lens as well as a bit slower at the long end.
I have not used either very much (they sort of followed me home as strays) but I am really surprised by how good i think the Tamron might be.
I probably should not be as it is an SP lens and i do love my old Tamron 300 2.8 SP and liked the two model 19ah SP lenses i had.
I have a camera club shoot tonight at a local festival and for various reasons my good lenses are not with me right now so thought i would take these two lenses and have a shoot out between them since they are essentially similar (both 28-80mm fairly slow and have some macro capability).
I use both as manual focus lenses adapted to My A7s.
They each cost me only a few dollars at the charity shop i work at (they were available to customers first).
On the left is a (near) mint Tamron adaptall 28-80 3.5-4.2 (model 27a) that came with a box and case and on the right a Sigma in very good condition AF lens for Pentax 28-80 3.5-5.6.
I would have thought doing a shootout the more modern Sigma might have had the edge but after just ONE comparison look now to get an idea, the old Tamron is light years better so not even going to bother taking the Sigma now.
Besides the Sigma is much harder to focus since it is a designed for AF lens as well as a bit slower at the long end.
I have not used either very much (they sort of followed me home as strays) but I am really surprised by how good i think the Tamron might be.
I probably should not be as it is an SP lens and i do love my old Tamron 300 2.8 SP and liked the two model 19ah SP lenses i had.
Last edited: