6D Retirement

Andy_222

Member
Messages
33
Reaction score
13
Hi,

I'm on the fence with this one. EOS R vs 5D mk IV.

I have been a happy 6D user for the last 7 years. I am now considering an upgrade to the 5D mk IV or an EOS R. (Cant justify the cost of the R6 or R5)

I don't upgrade often and I expect another 7 years out of my purchase.

In Australia 5D4 costs $3239au ($2320USD)

EOS R with EF adaptor is nearly $600au cheaper.

(prices are grey market, with 5 year warranty)

I really love my 6D as far as ergonomics and control layout, I find usability a very important aspect of cameras.

The R would be a no-brainer however my main concern is the sideways step Canon took with the control layout.

I focus with the AF-on back button and I see many negative comments about button placement on the R. Also no rear dial for exp comp.

I'd appreciate comments on the control layout of the EOS R? Is it that bad?

Oops...Perhaps I should have posted in the R forum.
 
Hi,

I'm on the fence with this one. EOS R vs 5D mk IV.

I have been a happy 6D user for the last 7 years. I am now considering an upgrade to the 5D mk IV or an EOS R. (Cant justify the cost of the R6 or R5)

I don't upgrade often and I expect another 7 years out of my purchase.

In Australia 5D4 costs $3239au ($2320USD)

EOS R with EF adaptor is nearly $600au cheaper.

(prices are grey market, with 5 year warranty)

I really love my 6D as far as ergonomics and control layout, I find usability a very important aspect of cameras.

The R would be a no-brainer however my main concern is the sideways step Canon took with the control layout.

I focus with the AF-on back button and I see many negative comments about button placement on the R. Also no rear dial for exp comp.

I'd appreciate comments on the control layout of the EOS R? Is it that bad?

Oops...Perhaps I should have posted in the R forum.
we have to look at it this way: dslr format is mature and has been through years of testing and changes. 5D4 is one of the best dslrs out there! it has all of the practical features one wants, and more, and does it with ease.

MLC format, on the other hand, is new for canon and it is still at BETA level, in my opinion! although i have thought about moving to R cameras, i quickly change my mind and stay with my 5DsR and 1Dx "mature" cameras. i don't drink the coolaid, in other words ;-) the new canon R6 and R5 cameras are suffering from shortcomings, whether it is excessive heat, battery short life, horrible heat generating CFexpress cards and numerous others we from users on daily bases! so, to sum it up, the latest R cameras are not ready for showtime, yet, not for me at least.

the other important issue is: how much have you invested in EF lenses and whether you are welling to ditch them. if you have considerable amount of money invested in EF lenses (like me), be prepared to take a considerable loss in unloading those EF lenses. so it is not just the camera format to consider but other echo system as well. personally, i know i'll be sticking with my "mature" dslrs and EF lenses for a while, until R cameras overwhelm and eclipse the dslr in every aspect by miles--that hasn't happened yet and won't for a while. so, it is up to you to search and investigate the move carefully and decide on something that you'll be happy for the next 7-8 years...the cycle of your upgrading :-) good luck.
 
Hi,

I'm on the fence with this one. EOS R vs 5D mk IV.

I have been a happy 6D user for the last 7 years. I am now considering an upgrade to the 5D mk IV or an EOS R. (Cant justify the cost of the R6 or R5)

I don't upgrade often and I expect another 7 years out of my purchase.

In Australia 5D4 costs $3239au ($2320USD)

EOS R with EF adaptor is nearly $600au cheaper.

(prices are grey market, with 5 year warranty)

I really love my 6D as far as ergonomics and control layout, I find usability a very important aspect of cameras.

The R would be a no-brainer however my main concern is the sideways step Canon took with the control layout.

I focus with the AF-on back button and I see many negative comments about button placement on the R. Also no rear dial for exp comp.

I'd appreciate comments on the control layout of the EOS R? Is it that bad?

Oops...Perhaps I should have posted in the R forum.
Hi Andy,

I’ve just traded my R in (for an R5), still have a 5D IV (and used to have a 6D).

The R and the 5D IV are both fantastic cameras and a joy to use (as was the 6D). If you can, visit a store to try them and - as you say - consider posting this on the R Talk Forum too.

However, here are some comments regarding the concerns you raise in your post -

In terms of BBF, I found the the AF-ON button on the R to be in an odd position - I had to twist my thumb to use it and with prolonged use this became quite uncomfortable, so I ended up changing back to conventional AF via the shutter button and used the AF-On button to enable exposure compensation (adjusted using the main dial). Meanwhile, my 5D IV offers 2 well positioned BBF buttons (if I also choose to use the * button option).

(I found the AF on my 5D IV more nimble than the R - quite simply, it's better at action shots).

So, if BBF/ action shooting are critical things for you, then I would recommend the 5D IV.

As I’ve mentioned, exposure compensation can be made readily adjustable on the R via one of the custom buttons/ main dial, or the lens control ring/ controller ring adapter (this can also be set so the ring only adjusts the setting when the shutter is half pressed).

I tried to like the M-Fn bar, settling on using it to change focus method, but to be honest it really wasn’t that great (and I’m not missing it on my R5). Some R users really like it though.

The R would benefit from a 3rd dial (now added on the R5), but with an RF lens - or the control ring adapter, similar functionality can be available and I found there were enough buttons on the R for all my customisations and needs (I was very happy with my set-up).

I never really got on with using the screen to move the AF point (though some R users love this feature) and ended up using the rather clunky 4-way buttons to move the point/ [Bin] to re-centre. I much prefer using the joystick of the 5D IV (and R5), but everyone differs.

The battery endurance of the 5D IV seems eternal compared to the R, but I rarely had to change batteries on my R even with all-day use. Both are robust (the 5D IV a little more so I believe) and I’ve used both day-long in adverse weather (with plenty of due care of course).

I found the extended AF point coverage, eye-AF and silent shutter all very useful features with the R. It’s also a little smaller and lighter (but loses some of this advantage if using an EF lens and the EF-R adapter). I really liked the R’s EVF and enjoyed the benefits of using it - and I missed this feature the most when I returned to the 5D IV. A heads-up histogram, exposure simulation and being able to review images in the EVF are major advantages (for me). (However, some R users find the slight - but still noticeable - jitter effect if panning/ shooting fast moving targets e.g. birds-in-flight can be irksome and would prefer an OVF). The R also has a flip screen, which I find very useful for multi-angle viewing (e.g. saving me from grovelling in the mud/ looking over crowds) and allowing me to close it for protection.

EF (and EF-S) lenses work just as well (some say even better) with the R than with a DSLR.

You may be surprised to hear that - despite all its foibles - I used my R in preference to my 5D IV most of the time, but when I got my R5 recently, the R or the 5D IV had to go - and I kept what I consider 'a design classic’ - the 5D IV. (Though I’m actually using my R5 :-D ).

Hopefully this helps - good luck with your choice…

Phil
 
Last edited:
Hi,

I'm on the fence with this one. EOS R vs 5D mk IV.

I have been a happy 6D user for the last 7 years. I am now considering an upgrade to the 5D mk IV or an EOS R. (Cant justify the cost of the R6 or R5)
Maybe I missed something, but this seems like an odd combination of points.

Because, as near as I can see, a R6 (body only) with an adapter would be around the same price as a 5D mk IV.

And your other comments make me wonder if the R6 would be exactly what you are looking for.
 
I'm in exactly the same place. I've been using (and loving) a 6D for the last few years but fancied an upgrade. I literally unboxed the R 3 days ago and so far I am really liking it. IQ is superb, the flip out screen is a massive bonus, the AF is fast and accurate. I'm still getting used to the controls but I am warming to it far more than I thought I would. The reviews seemed to suggest there was something compromised about the R but to me it feels like a slick and very very modern camera.



efe72f85d9424a44a8b7032d374ae501.jpg
 
Hi,

I'm on the fence with this one. EOS R vs 5D mk IV.

I have been a happy 6D user for the last 7 years. I am now considering an upgrade to the 5D mk IV or an EOS R. (Cant justify the cost of the R6 or R5)
Maybe I missed something, but this seems like an odd combination of points.

Because, as near as I can see, a R6 (body only) with an adapter would be around the same price as a 5D mk IV.

And your other comments make me wonder if the R6 would be exactly what you are looking for.
Thank you everyone for your input, some great points there.

As for R6. I'd jump at it, however in Australia currently it is $1000 - $1500AUD more (With adapter) than The 5D4 and R respectively. Mind you price of the R6 will reduce in time.
 
we have to look at it this way: dslr format is mature and has been through years of testing and changes. 5D4 is one of the best dslrs out there! it has all of the practical features one wants, and more, and does it with ease.

MLC format, on the other hand, is new for canon and it is still at BETA level, in my opinion! although i have thought about moving to R cameras, i quickly change my mind and stay with my 5DsR and 1Dx "mature" cameras. i don't drink the coolaid, in other words ;-) the new canon R6 and R5 cameras are suffering from shortcomings, whether it is excessive heat, battery short life, horrible heat generating CFexpress cards and numerous others we from users on daily bases! so, to sum it up, the latest R cameras are not ready for showtime, yet, not for me at least.

the other important issue is: how much have you invested in EF lenses and whether you are welling to ditch them. if you have considerable amount of money invested in EF lenses (like me), be prepared to take a considerable loss in unloading those EF lenses. so it is not just the camera format to consider but other echo system as well. personally, i know i'll be sticking with my "mature" dslrs and EF lenses for a while, until R cameras overwhelm and eclipse the dslr in every aspect by miles--that hasn't happened yet and won't for a while. so, it is up to you to search and investigate the move carefully and decide on something that you'll be happy for the next 7-8 years...the cycle of your upgrading :-) good luck.
I was thinking along much the same line. DSLR tech refined over many years into a great camera in the 5D4. Whereas the R is Canons very first attempt at FF mirrorless.

I also agree with you about the R6 and R5, its still early days. Canon did a good job to get there so quickly and great to see some improved sensors.

I don't jump on board new tech very quickly I guess.
 
the other important issue is: how much have you invested in EF lenses and whether you are welling to ditch them. if you have considerable amount of money invested in EF lenses (like me), be prepared to take a considerable loss in unloading those EF lenses. so it is not just the camera format to consider but other echo system as well. personally, i know i'll be sticking with my "mature" dslrs and EF lenses for a while, until R cameras overwhelm and eclipse the dslr in every aspect by miles--that hasn't happened yet and won't for a while. so, it is up to you to search and investigate the move carefully and decide on something that you'll be happy for the next 7-8 years...the cycle of your upgrading :-) good luck.
I hear you, I'm quite heavily invested in EF lenses as well and I have no real desire to, nor can I justify the cost of RF replacements.

5D mk IV is sounding better all the time!
 
the other important issue is: how much have you invested in EF lenses and whether you are welling to ditch them. if you have considerable amount of money invested in EF lenses (like me), be prepared to take a considerable loss in unloading those EF lenses. so it is not just the camera format to consider but other echo system as well. personally, i know i'll be sticking with my "mature" dslrs and EF lenses for a while, until R cameras overwhelm and eclipse the dslr in every aspect by miles--that hasn't happened yet and won't for a while. so, it is up to you to search and investigate the move carefully and decide on something that you'll be happy for the next 7-8 years...the cycle of your upgrading :-) good luck.
I hear you, I'm quite heavily invested in EF lenses as well and I have no real desire to, nor can I justify the cost of RF replacements.

5D mk IV is sounding better all the time!
Hi Andy,

There’s another resource you may find helpful Here

Phil
 
Update:

Just ordered a new 5Dmkiv.

Even though the EOS R would have its advantages and I see it as a very good first ff mirrorless for Canon, I went with DSLR for these reasons:

-Familiarity (Good old Canon controls which I love)

-I already have good EF lenses which I am very happy with, I know they can be used perfectly well with an adapter on R cameras but still.

-A sturdier camera with better weather protection and battery life.

-OVF, I have an older Fuji camera so having one camera with EVF and one OVF is nice.

-Fully refined DSLR vs first FF Mirrorless. I somehow feel I would want to update again sooner if I went R. Call me crazy on that point!

Thanks for your input.

Andy
 
Update:

Just ordered a new 5Dmkiv.

Even though the EOS R would have its advantages and I see it as a very good first ff mirrorless for Canon, I went with DSLR for these reasons:

-Familiarity (Good old Canon controls which I love)

-I already have good EF lenses which I am very happy with, I know they can be used perfectly well with an adapter on R cameras but still.

-A sturdier camera with better weather protection and battery life.

-OVF, I have an older Fuji camera so having one camera with EVF and one OVF is nice.

-Fully refined DSLR vs first FF Mirrorless. I somehow feel I would want to update again sooner if I went R. Call me crazy on that point!

Thanks for your input.

Andy
Congrats! I think you'll be very pleased. I've had the 6D, 6D2, and now the 5DIV. The upgrade will be very noticeable in every area that counts. While I enjoyed the 6D bodies, nothing about them makes me wish I still had one over the 5DIV.

Like many, I'm lusting after the new R bodies, but the price of the R5 is still well beyond my budget. I'm happy to wait a few years until they hit the $2K range, which is what I did with the 5DIV. Buying cameras later in their life cycle has saved me lots of money over the years.

--
My site:
http://www.gipperich-photography.com
 
Last edited:
Update:

Just ordered a new 5Dmkiv.

Even though the EOS R would have its advantages and I see it as a very good first ff mirrorless for Canon, I went with DSLR for these reasons:

-Familiarity (Good old Canon controls which I love)

-I already have good EF lenses which I am very happy with, I know they can be used perfectly well with an adapter on R cameras but still.

-A sturdier camera with better weather protection and battery life.

-OVF, I have an older Fuji camera so having one camera with EVF and one OVF is nice.

-Fully refined DSLR vs first FF Mirrorless. I somehow feel I would want to update again sooner if I went R. Call me crazy on that point!

Thanks for your input.

Andy
Hi Andy,

Congratulations! The 5D IV is a very special camera - you’re in for a real treat!

Phil
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top