tesla23
Leading Member
Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not much of an IQ improvement, but you get faster AF, especially with the older lenses. You'll be losing the big EVF and three-way tilt-screen.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
No d-pad (4 custom function buttons), stupid Q button, no WR, worse EVF, worse handling, worse build quality, tilt screen downgrade, mechanical shutter downgrade, IQ no better, worse high ISO performance etc. No, I would not sell my X-T2 for an X-T30. I don’t think I’d trade my X-T20 for a 30.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
No way. You would not if you were me. Sell the XT-2 and get the XT-4 if you like XT.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
Nothing will bring the X-T30 sensor in terms of IQ only worse high ISO handling.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
It doesn't "bring" anything...stick with what you have.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
Most of the IQ lies in the lens anyway. The X-trans4 sensor does have a bit better dynamic range(less noise in shadows) than the X-trans3 sensor, though. The X-T30 will also have better AF.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
I have an X-T3 and X-T30, had an X-T2 before.Nothing will bring the X-T30 sensor in terms of IQ only worse high ISO handling.Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.
X-T2 advantages: WR body, better high ISO handling, better EVF, dual card slot, better grip, available D-Pad
X-T30 advantages: only better AF-C
I've never agreed with the "worse high ISO performance" argument. Yes, the X-trans4 sensor does produce a bit more noise at high ISO compared to X-trans3, but at the same time it retains details better so you can just apply a bit more noise reduction and in the end you will get the same results. The X-trans4 sensor also has a bit better dynamic range(noticeably less noise in shadows).No d-pad (4 custom function buttons), stupid Q button, no WR, worse EVF, worse handling, worse build quality, tilt screen downgrade, mechanical shutter downgrade, IQ no better, worse high ISO performance etc. No, I would not sell my X-T2 for an X-T30. I don’t think I’d trade my X-T20 for a 30.
It’s small potatoes either way through - I’ve had both and can barely tell them apart. The big improvement in the fourth gen sensor is nothing to do with IQ and everything to do with the autofocus performance and the fact that it’s now PDAF right across the frame. That’s the reason (or not) to upgrade, not the IQ.I've never agreed with the "worse high ISO performance" argument. Yes, the X-trans4 sensor does produce a bit more noise at high ISO compared to X-trans3, but at the same time it retains details better so you can just apply a bit more noise reduction and in the end you will get the same results. The X-trans4 sensor also has a bit better dynamic range(noticeably less noise in shadows).No d-pad (4 custom function buttons), stupid Q button, no WR, worse EVF, worse handling, worse build quality, tilt screen downgrade, mechanical shutter downgrade, IQ no better, worse high ISO performance etc. No, I would not sell my X-T2 for an X-T30. I don’t think I’d trade my X-T20 for a 30.
Most of the IQ lies in the lens anyway so no surprise thereIt’s small potatoes either way through - I’ve had both and can barely tell them apart. The big improvement in the fourth gen sensor is nothing to do with IQ and everything to do with the autofocus performance and the fact that it’s now PDAF right across the frame. That’s the reason (or not) to upgrade, not the IQ.
YMMV, other processing options might yield different results, but with my typical workflow (Lightroom w/X-Transformer), the older sensor is less noisy at very high ISOs (especially in the chroma dept.), has significantly fewer hard to clean up artifacts and less color bleed too. I don’t see more detail from the newer sensor at any ISO, definitely not at very high ISOs.I've never agreed with the "worse high ISO performance" argument. Yes, the X-trans4 sensor does produce a bit more noise at high ISO compared to X-trans3, but at the same time it retains details better so you can just apply a bit more noise reduction and in the end you will get the same results. The X-trans4 sensor also has a bit better dynamic range(noticeably less noise in shadows).No d-pad (4 custom function buttons), stupid Q button, no WR, worse EVF, worse handling, worse build quality, tilt screen downgrade, mechanical shutter downgrade, IQ no better, worse high ISO performance etc. No, I would not sell my X-T2 for an X-T30. I don’t think I’d trade my X-T20 for a 30.
Well, that's my personal experience at least. I had an X-T2 and now I have an X-T3 and I find I can get very similiar results in terms of noise and detail, at least with Capture One.YMMV, other processing options might yield different results, but with my typical workflow (Lightroom w/X-Transformer), the older sensor is less noisy at very high ISOs (especially in the chroma dept.), has significantly fewer hard to clean up artifacts and less color bleed too. I don’t see more detail from the newer sensor at any ISO, definitely not at very high ISOs.I've never agreed with the "worse high ISO performance" argument. Yes, the X-trans4 sensor does produce a bit more noise at high ISO compared to X-trans3, but at the same time it retains details better so you can just apply a bit more noise reduction and in the end you will get the same results. The X-trans4 sensor also has a bit better dynamic range(noticeably less noise in shadows).No d-pad (4 custom function buttons), stupid Q button, no WR, worse EVF, worse handling, worse build quality, tilt screen downgrade, mechanical shutter downgrade, IQ no better, worse high ISO performance etc. No, I would not sell my X-T2 for an X-T30. I don’t think I’d trade my X-T20 for a 30.
You be the judge - here are the X-T2 and X-T3 side by side with the same NR settings at ISO 12800:
![]()
Identical NR settings
Here they are again, but with the noise equalized. Note the unavoidable color bleed in the lips and eyes with the X-T3 image
![]()
Equalized noise
I’ve shot with these two cameras side by side in low light and my real world experience bears out what I see in these images. Will any of this make a difference to the average shooter? Maybe not, the IQ will be nearly indistinguishable in most situations, but if very high ISOs are a frequent necessity for you, it might.
In “normal” use I agree, but at ISO 6400+? That has not been my experience.Well, that's my personal experience at least. I had an X-T2 and now I have an X-T3 and I find I can get very similiar results in terms of noise and detail, at least with Capture One.YMMV, other processing options might yield different results, but with my typical workflow (Lightroom w/X-Transformer), the older sensor is less noisy at very high ISOs (especially in the chroma dept.), has significantly fewer hard to clean up artifacts and less color bleed too. I don’t see more detail from the newer sensor at any ISO, definitely not at very high ISOs.I've never agreed with the "worse high ISO performance" argument. Yes, the X-trans4 sensor does produce a bit more noise at high ISO compared to X-trans3, but at the same time it retains details better so you can just apply a bit more noise reduction and in the end you will get the same results. The X-trans4 sensor also has a bit better dynamic range(noticeably less noise in shadows).No d-pad (4 custom function buttons), stupid Q button, no WR, worse EVF, worse handling, worse build quality, tilt screen downgrade, mechanical shutter downgrade, IQ no better, worse high ISO performance etc. No, I would not sell my X-T2 for an X-T30. I don’t think I’d trade my X-T20 for a 30.
You be the judge - here are the X-T2 and X-T3 side by side with the same NR settings at ISO 12800:
![]()
Identical NR settings
Here they are again, but with the noise equalized. Note the unavoidable color bleed in the lips and eyes with the X-T3 image
![]()
Equalized noise
I’ve shot with these two cameras side by side in low light and my real world experience bears out what I see in these images. Will any of this make a difference to the average shooter? Maybe not, the IQ will be nearly indistinguishable in most situations, but if very high ISOs are a frequent necessity for you, it might.
No just no...Besides the weather sealing the X-T2 has, i don’t see too many reasons not to sell it. I also wonder what the newer sensor of the X-T30 brings in terms of IQ and whatnot.