Hi, I've not posted for a while as I am just coming back into micro four thirds. My question is Panasonic G80 (G85) with kit lens for £499 or Panasonic G90 (G95) with kit lens on offer at the moment for £679?
My budget is not endless, so I thought with the G80 I could also buy the 25mm 1.7 prime lens for £135 (Amazon) and some accessories for the same price as the G90. My main use for the camera is stills photography (no great interest in video) and specifically both street photography and landscape.
The main advantages of the G90 from my perspective are the 20 megapixel sensor and possibly the dedicated buttons on top for WB, ISO and EV. I was almost pulling the trigger on the G90 but then I looked at the DPReview exposure latitude tool and compared the 2 cameras...
The G90 sensor looks so noisy compared to the G80 and my perception is that the G80 produces a better quality of image when increasing the stops of a RAW image when under exposing for highlights/low light. The normal image comparison tool does show that the G90 can resolve slightly more detail than the G80 however.
Can anyone with any experience offer any comment as to the relative image quality of these 2 cameras in a purely photographic role? Based on my potential use for street/landscape is the G90 worth an extra £180 when I can buy a decent lens for the difference? I've no problem with buying into slightly older tech all things being equal.
I know people might be screaming Fuji, Sony, Olympus, Canon at me but I really like the Panasonic range particularly because of the ergonomics, and MFT because of the smaller and lighter cameras/lenses.

My budget is not endless, so I thought with the G80 I could also buy the 25mm 1.7 prime lens for £135 (Amazon) and some accessories for the same price as the G90. My main use for the camera is stills photography (no great interest in video) and specifically both street photography and landscape.
The main advantages of the G90 from my perspective are the 20 megapixel sensor and possibly the dedicated buttons on top for WB, ISO and EV. I was almost pulling the trigger on the G90 but then I looked at the DPReview exposure latitude tool and compared the 2 cameras...
The G90 sensor looks so noisy compared to the G80 and my perception is that the G80 produces a better quality of image when increasing the stops of a RAW image when under exposing for highlights/low light. The normal image comparison tool does show that the G90 can resolve slightly more detail than the G80 however.
Can anyone with any experience offer any comment as to the relative image quality of these 2 cameras in a purely photographic role? Based on my potential use for street/landscape is the G90 worth an extra £180 when I can buy a decent lens for the difference? I've no problem with buying into slightly older tech all things being equal.
I know people might be screaming Fuji, Sony, Olympus, Canon at me but I really like the Panasonic range particularly because of the ergonomics, and MFT because of the smaller and lighter cameras/lenses.

Last edited: