Having two card slots on EM1.ii gives a number of options for what is saved on what card in what slot.
It would be very helpful to me, as an EM1.ii newbie, if folks could say what they have found to be the best practical arrangement, and what card type and capacity they have in each slot
Many thanks
tom
Thank for the replies. They have been very interesting, not least because there seems to be such a difference in the way people use the slots.
I had myself sort of decided that I would have a 32 Gb fast card in slot 1 and a slower bigger card in slot 2 which I could use as back up (probably keeping it in for a week's shooting). But that raised all sorts of questions which I have not been able to answer satisfactorily, and perhaps someone can help with just a couple.
Just how fast does a card need to be for the EM1.ii? There is a lot of pressure pushing us to buy expensive 300Mb/s UHSll cards, but I seem to be taking shots OK with cheapo 80Mb/s UHSl models. Mind you, I don't spray and pray (too old fashioned for that) and seldom take more than 4 shots in a burst (even that is something I have only just been experimenting with, with AF-c) So how big/fast a burst can be sustained with slow cards? When are we forced to use UHSll?
If I use the two slots as I envisaged above, and the camera is writing simultaneously to both slots, isn't it going to slowed down to the speed of the second slot (UHSl)? Doesn't that mean an expensive card in slot 1 is wasted?
Some benchmarks show that it is slower to write Raws to the fast slot, and JPEGs to the other (in a Raw + Jpeg situation) , than writing them all to the fast slot, so the potential advantage of separating RAW and Jpeg goes away (I know it's one less step in PP if they have been sorted out in camera)
I am a bit stuck to see where all the speed advantage of the fast slot takes me.
Please keep your replies coming, I am learning a lot!
thanks
tom