90D Green tint manual white balance?

Louisszq

New member
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, bought my 90D recently, i take videos primarily and im a little bit upset about my colors.

All of these pic are screenshot of my actual footages.
Shot on 90D , EOSHD C-LOG.

First three images are shot in manual white balance, the later three in AWB Ambience priority. As you can see there is very obvious tint/overlay of green which i have to +22 magenta tint during color correction. This happens not just in EOSHD C-log PP, as long as it is in manual white balance, in any profile, it will have green tint/cast/overlay. Is anyone having the same issue? Someone please enlightened me. Its bugging me, i thought i could turn a blind eye about this issue, i don want to be shooting in AWB forever ;(:-(

Having said i am an owner of the 80D too, i've compared it side by side, both same settings, same lens, same PP, and it is very obvious that the 90D looks "greener".

11606cbe4142434484624008df18c3a9.jpg

157fabbf833b48918433ba2bba59e890.jpg

b9f54dbf5469438cbe0d0646a23e242d.jpg

ed5019ee3c7c4a569b9d2866526775f0.jpg

11f11e34c5d1409ebbedce9228c007d9.jpg

85ba10be52a4432a87b0962a19bcde08.jpg
 
Are you sure the camera WB is set to neutral on the green–magenta axis?
 
Are you sure the camera WB is set to neutral on the green–magenta axis?
+1

Check this +/- setting in your WB menu, it might be up by the G portion, bring it back to center.
Check this +/- setting in your WB menu, it might be up by the G portion, bring it back to center.
 
Last edited:
Have you tried using a different picture profile?

I tried the EOS HD C log on my M6 2 and in shadows, I don't always get colors if I pull up the exposure a little. My white balance was the same as with other profiles but who knows, maybe it's affecting you in another way.

I think there's two types of AWB. You can toggle to the other setting to see if that helps.
 
Are you sure the camera WB is set to neutral on the green–magenta axis?
+1

Check this +/- setting in your WB menu, it might be up by the G portion, bring it back to center.
Check this +/- setting in your WB menu, it might be up by the G portion, bring it back to center.
Yeah, i even factory reset all the settings and it didnt work. my WB shift is 0,0.

In manual WB, i need to shift my magenta to M9 so that it looks more balanced, which i think it shouldnt be the case right?



Let me post pictures of proper comparison with all the settings listed together when i get home. Thanks for the reply guys i appreciate it, I've been googling this problem but seems like im the only one.
 
Have you tried using a different picture profile?

I tried the EOS HD C log on my M6 2 and in shadows, I don't always get colors if I pull up the exposure a little. My white balance was the same as with other profiles but who knows, maybe it's affecting you in another way.

I think there's two types of AWB. You can toggle to the other setting to see if that helps.
Yep, i used Technicolor's Cinestyle, also appear greenish. The only way to make it look natural is AWB. AWB is a function I do not want to rely on, thus this thread is made haha
 
Hi guys, sorry for the bad picture composition, but there it is, the settings that i used

Auto PP/EOSHD C-log PP, AWB White priority

VS

Auto PP/EOHD C-log PP, Manual White balance with 0,0 shift of colors.





468bf80a74ce4c0e8ab545ac2f41327b.jpg



eabca8e4777f4641baa0f7cdcfbdc197.jpg







8d5853d02dec48438b5a0df09081cc22.jpg

2a8e7d60e32d43d781c93ee539fb4702.jpg
 
All of these pic are screenshot of my actual footages.
Shot on 90D , EOSHD C-LOG.
This is a perfect example of why one shoots RAW and does color balancing later.

The proper correction on this is to use the "color temperature" setting in post processing.

A grey card would help a lot, too.
 
looks like it is time to send the camera in to the canon repair shop. BTW, those posted shots seem to be underexposed quite a bit on my screen!
 
All of these pic are screenshot of my actual footages.
Shot on 90D , EOSHD C-LOG.
This is a perfect example of why one shoots RAW and does color balancing later.

The proper correction on this is to use the "color temperature" setting in post processing.

A grey card would help a lot, too.
His original post states it is regarding video. That camera does not shoot raw videos. It does not even have true log gamma or 10bit video. It is only 8bit 4:2:0 h.264 IPB compression. Getting White balance correct in-camera is very important.

Also, I would blame the third party “log” picture profile way before I thought about taking the camera to canon but since the cast is present in all picture profiles then it can indeed be a more difficult issue and may indeed require Canon’s attention.
 
Last edited:
looks like it is time to send the camera in to the canon repair shop. BTW, those posted shots seem to be underexposed quite a bit on my screen!
Yes i do admit they are underexposed as my screen is adjusted to the max, and i forgot about monitoring my levels.

BTW Disclaimer, I am not a professional videographer, I just shoot this out of hobby for now! still a lot to learn, i only started this year :/
 
All of these pic are screenshot of my actual footages.
Shot on 90D , EOSHD C-LOG.
This is a perfect example of why one shoots RAW and does color balancing later.

The proper correction on this is to use the "color temperature" setting in post processing.

A grey card would help a lot, too.
His original post states it is regarding video. That camera does not shoot raw videos. It does not even have true log gamma or 10bit video. It is only 8bit 4:2:0 h.264 IPB compression. Getting White balance correct in-camera is very important.

Also, I would blame the third party “log” picture profile way before I thought about taking the camera to canon but since the cast is present in all picture profiles then it can indeed be a more difficult issue and may indeed require Canon’s attention.
Hmmm, damn, this means I have no other option but to go to Canon's service centre right ? :-(
 
looks like it is time to send the camera in to the canon repair shop. BTW, those posted shots seem to be underexposed quite a bit on my screen!
Yes i do admit they are underexposed as my screen is adjusted to the max, and i forgot about monitoring my levels.

BTW Disclaimer, I am not a professional videographer, I just shoot this out of hobby for now! still a lot to learn, i only started this year :/
no despair, birding is a tough challenging hobby, but once you get in it, it is hard to leave it ;-) however, birding requires lots of practice because those little critters don't give you chance more than a few seconds to shoot. but it sure is lots of fun. good luck and happy zooming.
 
I could be wrong, but it looks to me that you're simply setting an inappropriate manual white balance. The samples below are indoor artificial light which AWB appears to do a good job of interpretting. Your 2 samples with manual WB show a setting of 5700K, which is too high for most indoor lighting. Typically indoor lighting is in the range of 2800K - 4000K. And if it's fluorescent lighting then all bets are off since it tends to fluctuate more through the AC power cycling. You have to match the WB setting to K value of the lighting.
Hi guys, sorry for the bad picture composition, but there it is, the settings that i used

Auto PP/EOSHD C-log PP, AWB White priority

VS

Auto PP/EOHD C-log PP, Manual White balance with 0,0 shift of colors.

468bf80a74ce4c0e8ab545ac2f41327b.jpg

eabca8e4777f4641baa0f7cdcfbdc197.jpg

8d5853d02dec48438b5a0df09081cc22.jpg

2a8e7d60e32d43d781c93ee539fb4702.jpg


--
Unapologetic Canon Apologist :-)
 
I could be wrong, but it looks to me that you're simply setting an inappropriate manual white balance. The samples below are indoor artificial light which AWB appears to do a good job of interpretting. Your 2 samples with manual WB show a setting of 5700K, which is too high for most indoor lighting. Typically indoor lighting is in the range of 2800K - 4000K. And if it's fluorescent lighting then all bets are off since it tends to fluctuate more through the AC power cycling. You have to match the WB setting to K value of the lighting.
Hi guys, sorry for the bad picture composition, but there it is, the settings that i used

Auto PP/EOSHD C-log PP, AWB White priority

VS

Auto PP/EOHD C-log PP, Manual White balance with 0,0 shift of colors.

468bf80a74ce4c0e8ab545ac2f41327b.jpg

eabca8e4777f4641baa0f7cdcfbdc197.jpg

8d5853d02dec48438b5a0df09081cc22.jpg

2a8e7d60e32d43d781c93ee539fb4702.jpg
Yes my friend, I admit i am not a whitebalance expert when it comes to indoors or outdoors lighting. Like I said, i just started videography, but i am pretty sure white balance affects blue and orange more than the green-magenta tint. Objectively what i am concern is why the green tint is so huge in my pictures/footages, not about how warm or cool my video look like. I have tried many going warmer or cooler, yes it has less green but my video would be too cool or too warm.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top