I am hoping someone has come across problems like this and figured out the pros and cons already.
I hike a lot, when I am not bike-packing, and I always take my photography gear. I have never really much liked camera packs much because they just never seem to work for what I want them to. I want a safe bag for my kit that I can stop and grab something out at a moments notice to take a picture. I have owned the one shoulder style bags that can easily be unclipped and accessed from the side to access your gear without too much fuss, but there have always been more cons to them then good, in my opinion.
Recently, after breaking my arm and being unable to ride my bike (mostly because i broke my bike while breaking my arm. I am a multi-tasker) I got back into looking for a good hiking pack. Something like the Osprey Aether AG, or the Baltoro 65. But looking at things like the Alta Sky 51 or (to a lesser extent) the 66 has me wondering if those are worth looking into.
Basically, what I am trying to figure it out is if I have to take the pack off anyway, no matter what, to access my gear would a hiking pack or a camera backpack be better. I guess I am looking at whether price, comfort, durability, ease of access, and protection sways more one way or the other. For 275$, do I get a more specific Alta 51, or for 350$ do I get the baltoro 65. I feel like the dedicated hiking packs at that price range will be more comfortable for the long haul and always have lots of room, and I need to take the pack off to get my stuff anyway. But it has been some years since I have really looked into the camera bags and maybe I am out of touch, and those packs are far superior now and an alta 51 could do everything i want (or maybe the 66).
Has anyone tried to figure out the camera bag vs hiking pack problem, and what did you decide on? Do you do a lot of hiking for long distances? And have you missed or skipped shots with one vs the other because getting everything out was too much of a pain?
Just looking for some thoughts and experience.
Thank you.
I hike a lot, when I am not bike-packing, and I always take my photography gear. I have never really much liked camera packs much because they just never seem to work for what I want them to. I want a safe bag for my kit that I can stop and grab something out at a moments notice to take a picture. I have owned the one shoulder style bags that can easily be unclipped and accessed from the side to access your gear without too much fuss, but there have always been more cons to them then good, in my opinion.
Recently, after breaking my arm and being unable to ride my bike (mostly because i broke my bike while breaking my arm. I am a multi-tasker) I got back into looking for a good hiking pack. Something like the Osprey Aether AG, or the Baltoro 65. But looking at things like the Alta Sky 51 or (to a lesser extent) the 66 has me wondering if those are worth looking into.
Basically, what I am trying to figure it out is if I have to take the pack off anyway, no matter what, to access my gear would a hiking pack or a camera backpack be better. I guess I am looking at whether price, comfort, durability, ease of access, and protection sways more one way or the other. For 275$, do I get a more specific Alta 51, or for 350$ do I get the baltoro 65. I feel like the dedicated hiking packs at that price range will be more comfortable for the long haul and always have lots of room, and I need to take the pack off to get my stuff anyway. But it has been some years since I have really looked into the camera bags and maybe I am out of touch, and those packs are far superior now and an alta 51 could do everything i want (or maybe the 66).
Has anyone tried to figure out the camera bag vs hiking pack problem, and what did you decide on? Do you do a lot of hiking for long distances? And have you missed or skipped shots with one vs the other because getting everything out was too much of a pain?
Just looking for some thoughts and experience.
Thank you.