Laowa 17mm f/4 GFX Zero-D

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris Dodkin
  • Start date Start date
C

Chris Dodkin

Guest
The Laowa 17mm f/4 GFX Zero-D is the widest prime currently available for the GFX, and hasjust been launched by Laowa .

e0db8075aa8243fe8f035b37b674700e.jpg

This lens is currently the widest native lens available for Fujifilm G mount mirrorless cameras. The Ultra wide-angle FoV with a Close-to-zero distortion (Zero-D) make it perfect for landscape, architecture, interior and astrophotography. The 113° angle of view enables photographers to include more into the frame. The 86mm filter thread allows quick attachment of filters for different light conditions. The lens also features a 5-blade straight aperture system for creating a more pleasing sun-star rendering (10-point stars).

d26bd4d2d7b74564bb0459c1ee3859ed.jpg

Jonas Rask has had a copy to test, and has a write-up on his blog HERE

The Laowa 17mm f/4 features an all metal barrel build, that has a really nice feel to it. It has quite a smooth focusing ring that has a very nice 180 degree turn cycle from close focus to infinity.

The lens is pretty much distortion free all the way to the edges, and lines are nice and straight throughout the frame. However I saw some weird stuff going on at the corners of the frames. The corners seems stretched, but only if you photograph at real close distances. The trees above are good examples of this. The camera is 2 cm above the ground on the first image, and resting on the stem on the second. You can easily see what I mean from those two pictures. I don’t mind this at all, but some of you might.

The image quality is very good, and I really enjoy shooting with it. I still haven’t had the chance to do some street photography with it, or some long exposure ND filter photography, but I will do it when I have the time. SO far I’ve really been enjoying this lens for my GFX system.




f8eb35bf92354ab385c3c30ff3b945ac.jpg



ada5af0f05734f9c8a06a44b6831400b.jpg

Images used with express permission from Jonas Rask

Bryan Minear has also been shooting with the new lens, and has a full write-up HERE

After what seems like forever since the Laowa 17mm f/4 GFX Zero-D has been rumored or teased, it is finally a reality and I got to play with it for about a month. I am a relatively new GFX50S owner, though my relationship with the camera dates way back to the launch event in 2017 (see below). I couldn’t possibly think of a better way to break in a new camera than by getting to play around with a brand new lens. As a landscape shooter, of course I have a pretty good bias to ultra-wide angle lenses. The Fujifilm 23mm f/4 is a wonderful lens, but 18mm in full frame equivalence does not a happy Bryan make. It’s just in a bit of an odd focal length for me. I much prefer the 15-16mm range that I am used to shooting on the X Series, so the Laowa coming in at right around 14mm is perfect.

b3aaf7ef345a464fa7b28dd51f94e3b5.jpg

9d13f6ce08fe49e5b0462c60f0759919.jpg

--
Your time is limited, so don't waste it arguing about camera features - go out and capture memories - Oh, and size does matter - shoot MF
 
Last edited:
Jonas Rask also has his comments up on the lens. Looks like a good option for the system. I love that 3rd party lenses are being developed for it.
 
The wait seems to be over finally, would be nice to have one when leaving for canada in 4 weeks
 
Yes the link for Jonas Rask in also in the OP

I was also waiting for his ok to re-post some of his images - which I now have so the OP is updated with some of this work as well :-)

--
Your time is limited, so don't waste it arguing about camera features - go out and capture memories - Oh, and size does matter - shoot MF
 
Last edited:
Agreed Steve. I had hoped this would release last year when I was in NZ’s Dark sky reserve. I’m working on my Astro-tracking skills in Denver with plans to use this lens in late fall/winter camping in the mountains.
 
Agreed Steve. I had hoped this would release last year when I was in NZ’s Dark sky reserve. I’m working on my Astro-tracking skills in Denver with plans to use this lens in late fall/winter camping in the mountains.
I see one image of a house at night at f4 that looks like the stars are showing coma in the upper left and upper right. Stopping down to 5.6 might eliminate them at the cost of a longer exposure. What are you using to track?
 
I count myself among the group who heard about this lens and were excited for its release. I'm glad it's finally becoming a reality. As someone else sad, I'm glad that the system is garnering third-party support. The 113˚ angle of view is also really nice.

I'm just not sure I'd actually go for it. I don't think it's weather-sealed, which is a concern for me. I know there's some debate within the photography community as to whether weather sealing is really the big deal that companies make it out to be, but I'd rather have it than not.

I also don't like these full-manual lenses. For a lens like this, manually focusing isn't really a huge deal (and mirrorless makes it much easier, too), and I guess I could get by with manual aperture control as well, but I wish they would chip the lenses so that the EXIF data states the lens and aperture. I know we can do it manually but when you spend so much on a lens it just seems like it should be something we don't have to think about...

I guess the final consideration for me is that I'm not sure how I feel about having a prime lens at this focal length. It's generally true that when I've had ultra-wide zooms I tend to use either the widest end or the most narrow, but that's really wide!

I guess I'll wait for now. Fuji will have released all of the lenses on their roadmap with the 45-100mm next year, and presumably they'll provide another roadmap around then. If they list an ultra-wide zoom, or even a wider prime of their own, then I might be inclined to wait for that instead of going for the Laowa.
 
I count myself among the group who heard about this lens and were excited for its release. I'm glad it's finally becoming a reality. As someone else sad, I'm glad that the system is garnering third-party support.
Well, I said it here last year:

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/61051985

but I was hoping Zeiss and/or Sigma would follow suit.
The 113˚ angle of view is also really nice.

I'm just not sure I'd actually go for it. I don't think it's weather-sealed, which is a concern for me. I know there's some debate within the photography community as to whether weather sealing is really the big deal that companies make it out to be, but I'd rather have it than not.

I also don't like these full-manual lenses. For a lens like this, manually focusing isn't really a huge deal (and mirrorless makes it much easier, too), and I guess I could get by with manual aperture control as well, but I wish they would chip the lenses so that the EXIF data states the lens and aperture. I know we can do it manually but when you spend so much on a lens it just seems like it should be something we don't have to think about...

I guess the final consideration for me is that I'm not sure how I feel about having a prime lens at this focal length. It's generally true that when I've had ultra-wide zooms I tend to use either the widest end or the most narrow, but that's really wide!

I guess I'll wait for now. Fuji will have released all of the lenses on their roadmap with the 45-100mm next year, and presumably they'll provide another roadmap around then. If they list an ultra-wide zoom, or even a wider prime of their own, then I might be inclined to wait for that instead of going for the Laowa.
 
This 17 mm is tempting. I could live with manual. But with only one "to be announced" lens left on the G-mount lens roadmap I'm hoping we'll see some native lenses queuing up soon. Maybe something wider. Maybe a T/S. It would make the decision easier. Aren't we due for a new roadmap in September?
 
Agreed Steve. I had hoped this would release last year when I was in NZ’s Dark sky reserve. I’m working on my Astro-tracking skills in Denver with plans to use this lens in late fall/winter camping in the mountains.
I see one image of a house at night at f4 that looks like the stars are showing coma in the upper left and upper right. Stopping down to 5.6 might eliminate them at the cost of a longer exposure. What are you using to track?
I have the iOptron Skyguider Pro. I’ve used it with the 23mm and my Olympus 300mm. The 23 is easy, the 300 is a 840mm full frame equivalent prime so it’s a bear to find a DSO with it!

I think the 250 + 1.4 would push its practical weight limits but that’s just my inexperience gut feeling.
 
This 17 mm is tempting. I could live with manual. But with only one "to be announced" lens left on the G-mount lens roadmap I'm hoping we'll see some native lenses queuing up soon. Maybe something wider. Maybe a T/S. It would make the decision easier. Aren't we due for a new roadmap in September?
Does Fuji usually release their new roadmaps in September? That would be really nice - something to look forward to.

The news that the Laowa is a repurposed design with the Magic Converter on the back and a slightly redone aperture (fewer blades) makes it slightly less appealing to me. I know it shouldn't really matter - people are saying that it's very sharp from corner to corner, has minimal distortion, and so on (the things that matter) - but I like the idea of a lens designed from its inception for the system...

I haven't ruled it out yet. Still waiting to see what Fujifilm is planning.
 
I took the chance and ordered the lens from Laowa website , and got confirmation that it is shipped already.

If anybody is interested i could make some test and comparison with sigma 12-24 f4 art on Canon 5dsr , also Sigma on Gfx 100 with Techart pro adapter to see how those combinations compare. And maybe to find best solution for ultra wide lens on GFX.

(If their comparison with Canon 17mm f4 is accurate it should be fine lens)

Kristian
 
This 17 mm is tempting. I could live with manual. But with only one "to be announced" lens left on the G-mount lens roadmap I'm hoping we'll see some native lenses queuing up soon. Maybe something wider. Maybe a T/S. It would make the decision easier. Aren't we due for a new roadmap in September?
Does Fuji usually release their new roadmaps in September? That would be really nice - something to look forward to.
The most recent G-mount lens roadmap I can find on the Fujifilm site is dated September 2018: https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/roadmap/index.html

There was also one in September 2017: https://www.fujifilm.com/news/n170907_05.html

I'm hoping that means another roadmap this September.
 
I took the chance and ordered the lens from Laowa website , and got confirmation that it is shipped already.

If anybody is interested i could make some test and comparison with sigma 12-24 f4 art on Canon 5dsr , also Sigma on Gfx 100 with Techart pro adapter to see how those combinations compare. And maybe to find best solution for ultra wide lens on GFX.

Kristian
I'd be very interested, many thanks!
 
This 17 mm is tempting. I could live with manual. But with only one "to be announced" lens left on the G-mount lens roadmap I'm hoping we'll see some native lenses queuing up soon. Maybe something wider. Maybe a T/S. It would make the decision easier. Aren't we due for a new roadmap in September?
Does Fuji usually release their new roadmaps in September? That would be really nice - something to look forward to.
The most recent G-mount lens roadmap I can find on the Fujifilm site is dated September 2018: https://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/gfx/roadmap/index.html

There was also one in September 2017: https://www.fujifilm.com/news/n170907_05.html

I'm hoping that means another roadmap this September.
Good chance I suspect
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top