doni
Senior Member
For a $600-$700 lens in 2019 value, the Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 is still one of the best value lenses.
It amazes me how well this lens is aging. It doesn't have VR, not nearly as sharp or as optically perfect as the Sigma 105 f/1.4, or as sleek as the 70-200 variants. However, it gets the job done at a really low price point. T
This has been one of my first lenses (going back to the D1/h days). It survived that, the D2h, and the D3 cameras I own. To date, it is still my go to when it comes to portraits (that is, until I eventually get the Sigma 105 or the Nikkor 200 f2 when the price points go lower).
For now, this is one of the most affordable portrait lenses in the market. Sharp, versatile, and cheap.
Anyone still using this classic lens?
--
...in matters of grave importance, style not sincerity is the vital thing - Oscar Wilde
It amazes me how well this lens is aging. It doesn't have VR, not nearly as sharp or as optically perfect as the Sigma 105 f/1.4, or as sleek as the 70-200 variants. However, it gets the job done at a really low price point. T
This has been one of my first lenses (going back to the D1/h days). It survived that, the D2h, and the D3 cameras I own. To date, it is still my go to when it comes to portraits (that is, until I eventually get the Sigma 105 or the Nikkor 200 f2 when the price points go lower).
For now, this is one of the most affordable portrait lenses in the market. Sharp, versatile, and cheap.
Anyone still using this classic lens?
--
...in matters of grave importance, style not sincerity is the vital thing - Oscar Wilde