Z7 + Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2

[wonilsuh]

A perfect fit, image looks great too. Would love to see Z7 with the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.4 though. Anybody?

 

[Felipe Rodríguez]

A perfect fit, image looks great too. Would love to see Z7 with the Voigtlander 35mm f/1.4 though. Anybody?

It looks great, sure. But what about some sample images?

--

http://www.felipe-rodriguez.com

Bokeh
Dadme un mundo sin contornos,
Un espacio feliz que ignore los perfiles.
Concededme, sí, la dicha redonda
De flotar sin conciencia en el fondo
Desenfocado de mis fotografías.
Give me a world with no edges,
A happy space knowing nothing about outlines.
Grant me, please, the round joy
Of unconsciously floating on the blurred
Background of my photographs.

 

[Barlowephoto]

I'm interested as well. A lot of buzz on these Voigtlander lenses lately, this new lensmount is certainly opening up opportunities for some interesting optics from other makers!

 

[Mathieu18]

Should check out the 40/1.2. Noticeably shorter than the 35, and better IQ wide open especially at mid distance.

 

[wonilsuh]

Two shot with the lens, on Z7 with the Shoten adapter.

 

[Barlowephoto]

Looks promising indeed! Are these shot wide open? And such small images.

 

[wonilsuh]

Full size image. I did set non-cpu lens data, but it's not included in the RAW file for some reason.

Z7 + Shoten M-Z adapter + Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1/2

Shot in 16x9 aspect ratio @1/100sec | f/1.4 | ISO125

Color and some curve adjustment in LR.

 

[Mathieu18]

Thanks for sharing. Pushes me towards a Z6 and M 40/1.2.

Full size image. I did set non-cpu lens data, but it's not included in the RAW file for some reason.

Z7 + Shoten M-Z adapter + Voigtlander Nokton 35mm f1/2

Shot in 16x9 aspect ratio @1/100sec | f/1.4 | ISO125

Color and some curve adjustment in LR.

--
----------------------------------------------
MattParvin.com
It’s a lot easier to post a photo than it is to write 1,000 words...
“I believe there is nothing more disturbing than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept” ~ AA

 

[WhateverNickname]

smaller and a focal probably less prone to corner issues

anybody?

 

[fad]

Thanks for sharing. Pushes me towards a Z6 and M 40/1.2.

I'm curious. I have the F mount Voigtlander 40mm f2 ULTRON.

Is there any reason, besides the wider f stop, to prefer the 40/1.2 NOKTON, which is larger (but with a smaller adapter) and heavier (even with a lighter adapter)?

It's kind of ironic that my smallest lens requires an adapter that now makes it stick out further than it did on the D850.

 

[Mathieu18]

Less prone to corner issues but significantly weaker over all, it’s rightly called a Classic.

smaller and a focal probably less prone to corner issues

anybody?

 

[Mathieu18]

Thanks for sharing. Pushes me towards a Z6 and M 40/1.2.

I'm curious. I have the F mount Voigtlander 40mm f2 ULTRON.

I have that as well and really like it, but...

Is there any reason, besides the wider f stop, to prefer the 40/1.2 NOKTON, which is larger (but with a smaller adapter) and heavier (even with a lighter adapter)?

I didn’t weigh the two but I think the M 40/1.2 is a similar weight to the 40/2, and with an adapter to Mirrorless, overall size is very close. Otherwise, f/1.2 is a big reason, but general rendering is different as well. Both are compelling.

It's kind of ironic that my smallest lens requires an adapter that now makes it stick out further than it did on the D850.

 

[fujinewbi]

I am seeking opinions on M-mount adapters as I'm very interested in voigtlander 40 1.2 vs 50 1.2 but looking for recommendations.

 

[Mathieu18]

Nonexperience with the 50/1.2 but shot both 40’s for a while. Check over on FM, I know there is a thread about the 50 and a few shooters have ditched the 40/1.2 for the 50/1.2.

I am seeking opinions on M-mount adapters as I'm very interested in voigtlander 40 1.2 vs 50 1.2 but looking for recommendations.