I still can't understand why we don't get similar examples with mechanical shutter... it still takes around 1/250th - 1/320th of a second for the shutter curtain to cross the sensor and I would have thought some humming bird wings would be fast enough to cause a problem.
Rolling Silent Shutter Hummer Salute! E-M1.2 + 300/4 PRO @ ISO 5000, f/5.6, 1/2000s
The fast moving tip of the Hummer's left wing must have been readout from the sensor at the same downward speed.
In other words, as the image of the wing tip moved downwards in the sensor from row to row, this very same sensor row was readout by the rolling silent shutter.
K-H.
you see the same effect with bee's wings too, "arty" effect
It takes longer with e shutter. 1/60 from memory so that's 4 times slower at the least. Think when we get to 1/250 or 1/320 speeds we will all be cheering. Id'e just like to see some shutter sound emulation ;-)I still can't understand why we don't get similar examples with mechanical shutter... it still takes around 1/250th - 1/320th of a second for the shutter curtain to cross the sensor and I would have thought some humming bird wings would be fast enough to cause a problem.
Rolling Silent Shutter Hummer Salute! E-M1.2 + 300/4 PRO @ ISO 5000, f/5.6, 1/2000s
The fast moving tip of the Hummer's left wing must have been readout from the sensor at the same downward speed.
In other words, as the image of the wing tip moved downwards in the sensor from row to row, this very same sensor row was readout by the rolling silent shutter.
K-H.
--
Have Fun
Photo Pete
In the example above wouldn't that still be significant? Surely the streak caused by the wing tip would just be 3-4x shorter?... or is there something elso going on?It takes longer with e shutter. 1/60 from memory so that's 3_4 times slowerI still can't understand why we don't get similar examples with mechanical shutter... it still takes around 1/250th - 1/320th of a second for the shutter curtain to cross the sensor and I would have thought some humming bird wings would be fast enough to cause a problem.
Rolling Silent Shutter Hummer Salute! E-M1.2 + 300/4 PRO @ ISO 5000, f/5.6, 1/2000s
The fast moving tip of the Hummer's left wing must have been readout from the sensor at the same downward speed.
In other words, as the image of the wing tip moved downwards in the sensor from row to row, this very same sensor row was readout by the rolling silent shutter.
K-H.
--
Have Fun
Photo Pete
--
[URL]http://www.flickr.com/photos/14869355@N07/ [/url]
Sorry i edited my message, had to jump on the pc to do so as my phone wouldnt allow me to edit, 5 minute delay . The effect is there when you look at wing tips etc but its very minimal and looks almost natural at times. I would think its something to do with the way the pixels are read compared to a natural flowing curtainIn the example above wouldn't that still be significant? Surely the streak caused by the wing tip would just be 3-4x shorter?... or is there something elso going on?It takes longer with e shutter. 1/60 from memory so that's 3_4 times slowerI still can't understand why we don't get similar examples with mechanical shutter... it still takes around 1/250th - 1/320th of a second for the shutter curtain to cross the sensor and I would have thought some humming bird wings would be fast enough to cause a problem.
Rolling Silent Shutter Hummer Salute! E-M1.2 + 300/4 PRO @ ISO 5000, f/5.6, 1/2000s
The fast moving tip of the Hummer's left wing must have been readout from the sensor at the same downward speed.
In other words, as the image of the wing tip moved downwards in the sensor from row to row, this very same sensor row was readout by the rolling silent shutter.
K-H.
--
Have Fun
Photo Pete
--
[URL]http://www.flickr.com/photos/14869355@N07/ [/url]
--
