I'm thinking about getting the Ricoh GR ii and have been reading a lot about it. I already have a Sony r100, the original one.
I think very highly of the output from the rx100, both in jpg and raw. I truly think of it as a technological marvel, and these days use it more than my Sony DSLR and Canon 6D. The downside? The handling is clumsy.
The APS-C sensor in a small camera of the gr ii caught my eye. So did the reviews of the very sharp output and the great handling. Is the handling really that good?
Why bother? I find a new camera stimulates my creativity, and maybe I'll get into street photography. Any comments? Thanks.
I think very highly of the output from the rx100, both in jpg and raw. I truly think of it as a technological marvel, and these days use it more than my Sony DSLR and Canon 6D. The downside? The handling is clumsy.
The APS-C sensor in a small camera of the gr ii caught my eye. So did the reviews of the very sharp output and the great handling. Is the handling really that good?
Why bother? I find a new camera stimulates my creativity, and maybe I'll get into street photography. Any comments? Thanks.