Decent video editing software

Swordman

Leading Member
Messages
960
Reaction score
671
Location
US
Hi guys,

I'm a noob when it comes to video, but I'm after a decent bit of software that can do the following:

Dynamic word graphics - there's a word for it, but it escapes me for now.

Embedding pictures and video within the frame of the main video.

Colour correction

I tried out black magic's da vinci resolve, but I didn't like it as it couldn't handle .mts files coming out of my Sony without additional steps. I feel windows movie maker is too basic. I don't want to buy something cheap only for it to be no better than windows movie maker, but at the same time, I don't want to drop big money paying for features I won't be using.
 
Last edited:
Wondershare Filmora is worth a try too.


I'm using that at the moment, although I do intend giving others a try. It will do what you want.
 
Sony's VEGAS Movie Studio may fit the bill. You can download trial from this link:

http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/download/trials

It was bought by Magix last year. If you decide to buy you can go here:

http://www.vegascreativesoftware.com/us/vegas-movie-studio-product-comparison/

Here is YouTube video on color correction in Vegas Movie Studio:

The nice thing about Vegas is there's plenty of room to grow if you decide to upgrade
and don't want to learn a new interface.
 
I'm not sure what Dynamic Word Graphics are.

I often post that IMO, the best of the common NLEs will be the one you learn. Once learned, all others will fall short. They won't do things "your way". Few people learn more than one with any thoroughness.

Free are iMove and Windows movie maker.

Under $100 are Premier Elements, Corel VideoStudio, Cyberlink PowerDirector, Magix Move Edit and (Magix) Vegas Movie Studio. All are good and all take time to learn.

Over $100 and higher are (Magix) Vegas Pro, Final Cut Pro and Adobe Premiere Pro.

Resolve fits in for some special purpose editing. There are a few more aimed at broadcast and feature film production.
 
I've been using Cyberlink Power director 14-15 for a while now and pleased with its capabilities so far. Handles 4K sans problems. No problem intercutting photos.

Color correction includes the usual sat. & hue contols, as well as vibrancy, and a color temp/tint module with auto WB sampler.
 
+1 Likewise. Works with Ofx/Vst plugins too. Great for audio work.
 
As Bill Sprague said, folks get used to one software package and tend to stick with it. I've stuck with Power Director for many years. It may not be the best for everyone, but it works great for me, and there are add-ons for color and audio but I rarely need them as basic color and audio functions come in the base package. I use Picture in Picture and combine stills with video and mix video formats from several cameras all without a glitch. You can do all kinds of animation of titles and video clips. I never use those features. Runs great on a 4 year old notebook. I can't say I've shaken down the 4k usage very much as I've only been shooting and editing 4k for a few months, but, so far, all ok as far as combining 4k with HD in the same video.

Joe
 
As Bill Sprague said, folks get used to one software package and tend to stick with it. I've stuck with Power Director for many years. It may not be the best for everyone, but it works great for me, and there are add-ons for color and audio but I rarely need them as basic color and audio functions come in the base package. I use Picture in Picture and combine stills with video and mix video formats from several cameras all without a glitch. You can do all kinds of animation of titles and video clips. I never use those features. Runs great on a 4 year old notebook. I can't say I've shaken down the 4k usage very much as I've only been shooting and editing 4k for a few months, but, so far, all ok as far as combining 4k with HD in the same video.

Joe
I went back and looked at my post. I left out what I use! Six years ago I flopped around aimlessly between a few video software packages and wasted months. One day I tripped over some efficient and delightful training on Lynda.com for Adobe Premier Elements. Within days I was actually editing video! I've upgraded through versions 9, 10, 11, 13 and now 15.

Multi camera editing and syncing of external audio work, but could be a little better. Vlog editing with LUTs does not work. Other than that, it does everything I've ever heard of or read about that I would ever want to do. I'm now shooting, editing and viewing in 4K.
 
I've used Sony Vegas Pro in the past, but changed to Cyberlink Powerdirector a few years ago, and find it more intuitive, less buggy, and much faster to render than Vegas, although the latter may be much different now than when I was using it. Powerdirector consistently gets good reviews, and I've only scratched the surface of its many features.
 
I've used Sony Vegas Pro in the past, but changed to Cyberlink Powerdirector a few years ago, and find it more intuitive, less buggy, and much faster to render than Vegas, although the latter may be much different now than when I was using it. Powerdirector consistently gets good reviews, and I've only scratched the surface of its many features.
 
Bill, thanks for your post, it answers a question I had about whether Premiere Elements allowed color grading using LUTs. Oh, well...
 
Bill, thanks for your post, it answers a question I had about whether Premiere Elements allowed color grading using LUTs. Oh, well...
 
Hi guys,

I'm a noob when it comes to video, but I'm after a decent bit of software that can do the following:
It kind of depends on your goals. I just today, purchased Camtasia for the purpose of creating video tutorials and the creation of eLearning media in general. You can do that sort of thing with almost any video editor, but the right tools targeted at your specific needs, can make a huge difference. I selected TechSmith's Camtasia ($199/USD) primarily because it did the things you have asked for.
Dynamic word graphics - there's a word for it, but it escapes me for now.
The annotation capabilities are very strong, both animated and stationary. It's more than captioning, it is the ability to stack effects on top of each other.
Embedding pictures and video within the frame of the main video.
Yes, I was particularly impressed with the ability to embed a camera image within a pre recorded video and embed one pre recorded image within another.
Colour correction
None of the tools I personally tested had the level of color management that is found in still photography editors, but Camtasia handles basic color adjustments fairly well.

676b062c0c6b46d6814a4f0092802c38.jpg
I tried out black magic's da vinci resolve, but I didn't like it as it couldn't handle .mts files coming out of my Sony without additional steps.
Unfortunately, it can't handle mts files. See the web page that describes the supported files HERE. If you can't find a suitable Editor that handles mts natively, I can recommend ACDSee's Video Converter pro. It's pretty easy to use and even handles simple trimming tasks.

I haven't ever used a camera that creates an mts file, but the help claims that mts is a supported input file.
I feel windows movie maker is too basic. I don't want to buy something cheap only for it to be no better than windows movie maker, but at the same time, I don't want to drop big money paying for features I won't be using.
I know how you feel, I tested some inexpensive editors as well. For the most part, they were fine editors, and most were pretty easy to use. I was particularly impressed with ACDSee's Video Studio 2, which surprised me since Video Studio 1, wasn't very good. I could recommend it without reservation who wants a simple editor with some basic captioning capabilities.

I also looked at Corel's VideoStudio X10 Ultimate, which was roughly between Video Studio 2 and Camtasia in features, but the free trial was crippled enough that I could not post a video to YouTube to see how the entire flow of work suited me.

In the end, I decided to go with the most expensive option. The reasons being
  • It was almost as easy to use as those editors aimed at the casual user, but offered a wealth of additional features.
  • Over the weekend, I had a technical issue that required (I thought) required tech support even though I was using the free trial. A tech support guy contacted me that next Monday, and I felt the support was timely and appropriate.
  • However in the meantime I posted my question on the TechSmith user's forum and the other users had steered me to the point where I felt I was very close to resolving my issue. The sense of community was strong and much appreciated by this newbie.
  • There was quite a bit of extras available for downloading on the website, including Royalty free music, graphics and actions.
  • Both the formal reviews, and the informal 'chatter' on third party forums seemed pretty positive. Lot's of people think of it as an expensive option, but almost no one spent much time trash talking over it!
In the end, I felt the option with the most 'bang for the buck' was the most expensive choice. I've already got my first video tutorial almost completed with production values much higher than I dreamed possible a month ago.

My advice is, if you've got the choices narrowed down to 2 or 3 candidates, select the option with the best cost/benefit ratio. Don't just get the cheapest, look at the intangibles as well.

--
I look good fat, I'm gonna look good old. . .
http://glenbarrington.blogspot.com/
http://glenbarringtonphotos.blogspot.com/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/130525321@N05/
 
Last edited:
Sony Vegas Movie Studio provides good value. I used it for many years, and the support for Intel QuickSync (hardware enable encoding) was great. Movie studio has some stability issues.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top