Anyone switch from A6300 to XT-2/1 ?

Picking the xt2 with 56/1.2 and kitlens up tomorrow as a rental. Very anxious to use it over the weekend next to my a6300. Will be a major thing for me to decide whether to stick with Sony or switch over. Downloaded some raw files and noticed sharpening in lightroom can produce strane swirly noise and noise seems about the same as the a6300 in raw. But mainly looking forward to trying the controls, jpg and the handling.
 
Picking the xt2 with 56/1.2 and kitlens up tomorrow as a rental. Very anxious to use it over the weekend next to my a6300. Will be a major thing for me to decide whether to stick with Sony or switch over. Downloaded some raw files and noticed sharpening in lightroom can produce strane swirly noise and noise seems about the same as the a6300 in raw. But mainly looking forward to trying the controls, jpg and the handling.
Would be very keen to hear what your thoughts are regarding the X-T2 vs the A6300.

Would you be able to post back your thoughts?
 
Interesting comparison. Lenses for APSc A6300 yes but not full frame. Fuji lenses are great but Loxia and Batis are better. Quite a bit better. Not sure about Sony GM lenses, I think they are great but hideously expensive and large.

Auto white balance on both Sony and Fuji I thought were a wash. Sony, Fuji seem to have better white balance than Canikon in my experience at least.

Fuji's cameras have a certain character which is the main differentiator.

Greg.
 
Last edited:
I was a fairly long time Sony user. I bought the NEX-6 new, preordered the a6000 when announced, and used the a6000 up until about the time the a6300 was released. At that time, I sold all my Sony lenses and flashes, and bodies and made the leap to Fuji.

For me there were several factors, none of which might be decisive in and of themselves, but taken together added up to a decision:

1) Form factor, build, and ergonomics - I liked the NEX-6 a bit better than my a6000. The NEX-6 had more of a premium look and feel that was lacking in the black bar of soap that is the a6000. The a6000 might have had better performance, but was a bit of a let down in some ways. In both cases, I didn't care for Sony menus and really craved more physical controls. I had high hopes that Sony would borrow just a bit of the design and controls from their A7x line for the next APS-C release, but instead we just got another, slightly upgraded, a6000 with a little more metal and 4K video. However, in terms of form factor and ergonomics, you can't hardly tell the a6300 from the a6000; they're both black bars of soap. I suspect the a6300 was supposed to be out a long time ago, but heat issues and other bugs delayed it. At any rate, it's not much of an upgrade, in my mind, and made me feel like the Sony APS-C camera bodies are just as stagnant as their APS-C lens line is.

2) Speaking of lenses - Acutally, I wasn't that bothered by the fact that Sony hasn't released an APS-C lens in years. I had a bunch of them and felt like I was pretty well covered. It's just that they weren't that great. Sony APS-C lenses are either a) mediocre, b) overpriced, or c) both at the same time. Some are okay, but few if any are great.

3) Directly related to #1 and #2 above, regardless of what anyone on the Sony forum says, I really do believe that Sony is pretty much done with any serious R&D on APS-C systems. Oh, they might put out a new body here and there to keep a few entry level dollars coming in, but make no mistake, they are no longer particularly interested in APS-C. I'm not that interested in going FF so I tend to think my interests are going different places than Sony's interests are. So, probably time to part ways.

4) Cameras vs. Gadgets - This one is perhaps the most subjective and hard to define, but I always felt like Sony cameras were packed full of gee-whiz technology but were painfully short on input from long standing working photographers. As an old film photographer (though not professional) Sony cameras always felt like high-tech gadgets, but never quite like serious cameras.

5) LOVE - Okay, I was wrong. This one is the most subjective by far. I just never loved my Sony gear in the way that I do my Fuji gear. I am truly addicted to holding, using, and thinking about Fuji gear in a way that I never was with Sony. Fuji has captured my imagination again after many years and rekindled my love for photography. I can't imagine ever going back to equipment with no soul.
 
5) LOVE - Okay, I was wrong. This one is the most subjective by far. I just never loved my Sony gear in the way that I do my Fuji gear. I am truly addicted to holding, using, and thinking about Fuji gear in a way that I never was with Sony. Fuji has captured my imagination again after many years and rekindled my love for photography. I can't imagine ever going back to equipment with no soul.
 
I have shot with and/or owned more cameras in the past 2 years than I care to admit. Recently tried both the A6300 and the XT-2 and settled on the XT-2 for the following reasons;

- Better lens selection. There is hardly a Fuji lens out there that isn't superb. Sony (Sony/Zeiss) has some good ones too but they are not as consistently as good as the Fuji lenses.

- Much better OOC files. Colors are gorgeous. Sony files look a bit drab until some post processing is applied to them.

- I like the manual shutter speed and ISO dial on the XT-2

I would suggest that one factor that might make one choose an A6300 over an XT-2 is video. The video in the XT-2 is a big step up from the XT-1 but it in no way, shape or form can compare to the video capabilities of the A6300. So this should be the deciding factor as to which to choose. If you intend to do a lot of video and want the best control and output, go with the A6300. If you are purchasing for stills only, go with the XT-2. If you want a combination of both, I would then ask just how serious you are about video. If the answer is "very" I would suggest the A6300. It's not a bad still camera at all.
 
Last edited:
Well, I feel a bit ridiculous but I've just ordered an X-T2 with 18-55 and pre-ordered the 23mm f2.

I really don't need any more cameras.

I took my A7RII on the weekend and while the photos are quite amazingly detailed, im finding more and more I just don't enjoy the images coming out of them until after I have heavily processed them. Im also kind of tired of the flimsy little buttons and dials.

My A6300 is a pocket rocket, but i've been less than impressed with the colors of the photos. Even using the Zeiss 24mm it almost always looks kind of flat and boring. I've twiddled with the saturation and contrast endlessly but im still not loving what im getting from it.

I ordered the X-T2 from Adorama so I can return it within 30 days if i'm not satisfied.

At this point, if it matches the quality of either of these cameras but feels like a more premium product, ill be happy. I miss the feeling of a nice camera in hand and not a plastic box of high tech electronics.

Yes, GAS is certainly at play here, but I guess im just looking to scratch that itch that the Sony never really hit.

My workload will be 90% stills. I also want to use the camera in day to day use, not just for photographic work (this is where the Sony lets me down, requires editing all the time), 90% of my photos are done with a 35mm equiv, a 50mm equiv and a 24-70 and a 16-35 .. so, with that in mind, i think the fuji will be a good choice (i hope)

--
My App: https://www.lightroomdashboard.com
My Blog: http://fzero.io
My Photos: https://www.flickr.com/cheynewallace | https://500px.com/CheyneWallace | https://instagram.com/cheynewallace
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top