Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
-The focal range is approximately 13-19 inches from the subject. If you stay more towards the far end, and use zoom, you'll get better bokeh.I just bought a 500D close-up after seeing plenty of people using it so well here. Any general tips over all for macro photography with the FZ200? I'm pretty new overall to photography - the FZ200 is my first legit camera.
And excellent advice it is too. As well as practising to get a feel for the depth of field at various apertures, I would suggest a couple of other experiments to see what works for you.Wow, thanks so much! This is exactly the type of stuff I was looking for.








When I first started shooting macro, I stuck with P mode adjusting the ISO depending on the light condition, which is typically between 100 and 400. On very bright days, I sometimes use flash to eliminate harsh shadows. I never use a tripod when shooting bugs because they simply move around too much and I can't keep up with a tripod. But I always use the burst mode and shoot tons of images of each subject (if the subject stays put, I will shoot 15 to 20 or more shots of one subject) and I usually end up with 1 or 2 keepers. As Nico wrote, always use center AF with the small AF area setting. Find a good working distance that works for you. I think the 500D has the same magnification as my LC-55 which case I like to stay 12 - 20 inches from my subject. The further back you are and more you zoom in, you get stronger bokeh (blurry background) which isolates you subject nicely.
Its really all about practice and shoot as many as you can. Once you get comfortable, you can start experimenting with other settings.
I assume you are using the adapter tube? If you are attaching the 500D directly to your lens, some of these advice may not apply.
Please visit my weekly Monday Macro/Closeup thread and ask for camera settings and other advice, everyone's happy to help!
When I first started shooting macro, I stuck with P mode adjusting the ISO depending on the light condition, which is typically between 100 and 400. On very bright days, I sometimes use flash to eliminate harsh shadows. I never use a tripod when shooting bugs because they simply move around too much and I can't keep up with a tripod. But I always use the burst mode and shoot tons of images of each subject (if the subject stays put, I will shoot 15 to 20 or more shots of one subject) and I usually end up with 1 or 2 keepers. As Nico wrote, always use center AF with the small AF area setting. Find a good working distance that works for you. I think the 500D has the same magnification as my LC-55 which case I like to stay 12 - 20 inches from my subject. The further back you are and more you zoom in, you get stronger bokeh (blurry background) which isolates you subject nicely.
Its really all about practice and shoot as many as you can. Once you get comfortable, you can start experimenting with other settings.
I assume you are using the adapter tube? If you are attaching the 500D directly to your lens, some of these advice may not apply.
Please visit my weekly Monday Macro/Closeup thread and ask for camera settings and other advice, everyone's happy to help!
Lenses like the 500D work at a fixed distance between the lens and the subject.I'm actually not using the adapter tube, just attaching it directly. Do you mind explaining the differences between using an adapter tube/not?
If you have an adapter tube, then that distance doesn't change as you change zoom.
If you attach the 500D directly to the camera lens, then you need to move the camera closer to the subject as you move from full zoom to less zoom, since the camera lens extension decreases and the 500D moves away from the subject.
That's much more of an issue if you use a tripod than if you handheld.
When shooting macro with close-up lenses, the focal plane can be quite thin - leaving only part of you subject truly in focus. Shrinking the aperture may increase the Depth of Field (DOF) enough to get more of your subject in focus.Would someone mind breaking down in a somewhat simple way the effects of using a small vs large aperture? I see most recommendations for smaller apertures and I'm not entirely sure why.
Wider/lower-numbered apertures give a smaller depth of field, meaning that your subject will be in focus, but the things behind or in front of it will be (nicely) blurred, so that nothing else competes for your eye other than the subject. That effect is known as 'bokeh,' If you use a narrower/higher-numbered aperture, there is less or no bokeh, and it doesn't look as pleasing to the eye.Would someone mind breaking down in a somewhat simple way the effects of using a small vs large aperture? I see most recommendations for smaller apertures and I'm not entirely sure why.
I believe I heard at some point that it's best to keep the FZ200 at 4.5 or larger (or something similar like that) for reasons that are beyond my understandingWhen shooting macro with close-up lenses, the focal plane can be quite thin - leaving only part of you subject truly in focus. Shrinking the aperture may increase the Depth of Field (DOF) enough to get more of your subject in focus.Would someone mind breaking down in a somewhat simple way the effects of using a small vs large aperture? I see most recommendations for smaller apertures and I'm not entirely sure why.
--
Bruce
You learn something new every time you press the shutter
Wider/lower-numbered apertures give a smaller depth of field, meaning that your subject will be in focus, but the things behind or in front of it will be (nicely) blurred, so that nothing else competes for your eye other than the subject. That effect is known as 'bokeh,' If you use a narrower/higher-numbered aperture, there is less or no bokeh, and it doesn't look as pleasing to the eye.Would someone mind breaking down in a somewhat simple way the effects of using a small vs large aperture? I see most recommendations for smaller apertures and I'm not entirely sure why.
As a note, when you get down to macro photography, the depth of field gets to be incredibly shallow to the point where if you're doing a macro shot of a ladybug, the ladybug's head might be in focus, but the body will fade into blurriness. So you really have to consider your subject and experiment to get the correct amount of whatever you are shooting in focus.
When shooting macro with close-up lenses, the focal plane can be quite thin - leaving only part of you subject truly in focus. Shrinking the aperture may increase the Depth of Field (DOF) enough to get more of your subject in focus.Would someone mind breaking down in a somewhat simple way the effects of using a small vs large aperture? I see most recommendations for smaller apertures and I'm not entirely sure why.