Lenses listed wrong?

[Funkyd3121]

Yesterday while in Barnes & Noble I was looking at the May-June issue of Digital Photo Pro magazine & on page 39 under a photographer's Gear list & there were 3 Canon lenses that either do not exist or they made some serious typos. Here are the lenses they listed:

35mm 2.8L; 50mm 1.4L & an 85mm 1.8L - huh????

 

[scorrpio]

Interesting. Snapshot of the page, maybe?

There are 35 f/2.0 and 35 f/1.4L. No 35 f/2.8 IIRC.

There are 50 f/1.4 and 50 f/1.2L

There are 85 f/1.8 and 85 f/1.2L

 

[Howard S]

http://www.digitalphotopro.com/profiles/michael-b-shane-on-the-verge.html?start=3#.U39xoPmSx8E

 

[andrewdaviesphotography]

Yesterday while in Barnes & Noble I was looking at the May-June issue of Digital Photo Pro magazine & on page 39 under a photographer's Gear list & there were 3 Canon lenses that either do not exist or they made some serious typos. Here are the lenses they listed:

35mm 2.8L; 50mm 1.4L & an 85mm 1.8L - huh????

Its a dam good way to get traffic to your site , mention some non existent lenses !

Wedding Photographer and proud of it

 

[Vera Cognome]

Yesterday while in Barnes & Noble I was looking at the May-June issue of Digital Photo Pro magazine & on page 39 under a photographer's Gear list & there were 3 Canon lenses that either do not exist or they made some serious typos. Here are the lenses they listed:

35mm 2.8L; 50mm 1.4L & an 85mm 1.8L - huh????

The only thing unusual about people writing about non-existent lenses is that this author isn't panning them.