why my photos has too much noise in it?

yonsarh

Senior Member
Messages
1,951
Solutions
1
Reaction score
222
Location
KR
Ok. I have a compact portable camera that is 5 years old now. When I compare photos , with others, pictures seems to be sharp and colorful, but my photos has too much noise and images are blur. what are the reasons? I just got my brand new monitor.

1. it is time to replace old camera

2. lack of editing skills

3. it seems camera functions well for the first few years then

camera become very dull.

4. photos should not be taken with more than ISO 100 ???
 
Last edited:
but my photos has too much noise and images are blur. what are the reasons?
Some Reasons for Blur and Noise are:
  • To high ISO Values for this Sensor.
  • To long Shutter-Time for the used Focal-Length.
  • To less Light.
  • To hot Environment.
  • Water Condensation on the Lens.
  • Shaky Hands.
For more Details, please Post some Photos with full EXIF-Data.
 
Last edited:
More noise appears at higher ISO levels.

So keeping ISO low is important in a general sense. However note that noise visible on a screen when you view the image in great detail won't normally be visible in prints or even o screen at normal viewing sizes - i.e. viewing the image as a whole.

So maybe you're looking at the images too closely.

Now you may also be seeing motion blur, which is when the subject moves during the exposure. That's dealt with by raising shutter speed.

Here's the catch :

You can trade between aperture ( f-number ), ISO and shutter speed. However, if the light level is too low ( by the camera's standards ) you could end up trading e.g. a slow shutter speed for a low ISO level. That might introduce motion blur instead of high ISO noise.

When the situation gets like that there are two solutions :
  • Flash. Moving subjects ( or humans "standing still" ) close by.
  • A tripod, longer exposure and low ISO. This is for e,g, landscapes in low light.
But you can't always have what you want.

A slow shutter speed can also introduce shake blur.

A wide aperture ( low f-number ) will result in a reduced depth of field, which means less depth into the image will be in focus. This is less of an issue with compacts.

Compacts have small sensors and noise becomes apparent very quickly, a little more so on a relatively old one.

You need to learn about exposure and depth of field and flash to balance these options.

 
Also try cleaning the lens, if it's dull and you're getting a lot of grain it may be dirt on the lens. But, it's a 5 year old camera, it may be time to consider getting a newer camera, you don't have to spend a lot of money either. Almost anything above a basic pocket point and shoot camera will be better quality than a 5 year old compact.
 
Post some samples with the exif intact so we can see the evidence.

--
Kevin Coppalotti
http://maxhr.zenfolio.com/
with built-in flash
with built-in flash

without flash + autolevel
without flash + autolevel

I have set my camera sharpness setting to max. still pictures are bit blur....

took with macro mode.
 
Last edited:
Ok. I have a compact portable camera that is 5 years old now. When I compare photos , with others, pictures seems to be sharp and colorful, but my photos has too much noise and images are blur. what are the reasons? I just got my brand new monitor.
  1. it is time to replace old camera
When you compare with newer cameras, perhaps this is the solution. 5 years difference would give you quite some improvement. Perhaps 2-3 stops?
  1. lack of editing skills
Perhaps. But you can only do so much in PP.
  1. it seems camera functions well for the first few years then
    camera become very dull.
I would suspect only in comparison with other cameras..
  1. photos should not be taken with more than ISO 100 ???
The older the camera and the more sensitive you are to noise, the more true it is. That is, if you insist on comparing with newer models.

Regards, Mike
--
Wait and see...
 
Post some samples with the exif intact so we can see the evidence.

--
Kevin Coppalotti
http://maxhr.zenfolio.com/
with built-in flash
with built-in flash

without flash + autolevel
without flash + autolevel

I have set my camera sharpness setting to max. still pictures are bit blur....

took with macro mode.
Both images are shot at 1/30 ss (which is such an odd choice considering the aperture settings). Which is nearly impossible to hand hold without a little blur. The problem with point and clicks is that it does att the thinking for you. If you are serious about photos, but want something portable I would say look into a 4/3 camera that offers some manual abilities.

--
-Amateur Photographer, Professional Photo Faker
https://www.flickr.com/photos/49019071@N03/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2334596/
 
Last edited:
Dp review looked at this camera and said it was on par with similar spec cameras at that time. As the other poster mentioned its a low shutter speed for hand holding.

Have you asked the guys on the ricoh forum who have used this camera?
 
Also, no need to shoot at 100 ISO in low light. In that lighting I would say 400 bare minimum. With my d600 I would shoot 3200.
 
thx for the all advices. maybe I'll try higher shutter speed and higer iso next time...

I usually don't go more than up to shutter speed of 30-60.
 
Last edited:
Raising ISO will just make matters much worse, the higher the ISO the worse the noise.

Shooting 1/30th sec with flash should be just fine. The flash duration will be the effective shutter speed.

Newer cameras are generally better as technology improves with each passing year. Think about what you want your camera to do - if you are just posting small photos of food on the web like your examples then your current camera is fine.
 
Raising ISO will just make matters much worse, the higher the ISO the worse the noise.

Shooting 1/30th sec with flash should be just fine. The flash duration will be the effective shutter speed.

Newer cameras are generally better as technology improves with each passing year. Think about what you want your camera to do - if you are just posting small photos of food on the web like your examples then your current camera is fine.

--
Steve
www.pbase.com/steephill
yes, I thought so this about too. infact, my camera has noise reduction level to max, so I think for blogger camera this compact will just do it fine.
 
Raising ISO will just make matters much worse, the higher the ISO the worse the noise.

Shooting 1/30th sec with flash should be just fine. The flash duration will be the effective shutter speed.

Newer cameras are generally better as technology improves with each passing year. Think about what you want your camera to do - if you are just posting small photos of food on the web like your examples then your current camera is fine.

--
Steve
www.pbase.com/steephill
Not true at all!! Raising iso and exposing correctly will actually produce less noise! An underexposed image will be noisy, regardless of ISO.

Also, ISO 100 is for bright studio lighting and mid day sun. Not darkness. Shooting that image at 100 ISO would require a tripod to properly expose and actually reduce noise.

--
-Amateur Photographer, Professional Photo Faker
https://www.flickr.com/photos/49019071@N03/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2334596/
 
Last edited:

I shot that last night at ISO 4000. Proper exposure produces less noise than high ISO.

--
-Amateur Photographer, Professional Photo Faker
https://www.flickr.com/photos/49019071@N03/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2334596/
ofcourse we'll have to use Noise reduction features, right?
If I use noise reduction it's not set high. High nr ruins detail. Checked exif, noise reduction was off.

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/49019071@N03/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2334596/
 
Last edited:
I have set my camera sharpness setting to max. still pictures are bit blur....

took with macro mode.
OK, thank You for Posting these Samples.
I don't see any Blur in the first Photo.

First, if You shot the Cake with Flash, remove the Lens Hood if You don't want the Lens Shadow in the Bottom of the Photo.

The first Photo looks sharp enough to me with this Size and Distance,
because the DOF is small at this Distance in Macro Mode.

The second Photo looks 1.5-2cm Back Focused, possible the Lens is under the closest macro Focus Distance.

My few Tips for You:
  • Remove the Lens Hood before You shoot with Flash.
  • Use a shorter/faster Shutter-Time. (1/200s - 1//250s, if possible with Flash)
  • Use a Wireless Trigger for a External Flash (if the Lens is to long). (€ 40)
  • If You don't want to shoot with Flash, use a good mobile Tri-Pod with Self-Timer.
  • Shoot the Photo with a bit more (+15cm) Distance for a bit more DOF.
Good Luck with the next Cake. ;-)

DSCF2653k.jpg


DSCF2652k.jpg


DSCF4231ka.jpg


DSCF4232ka.jpg


DSCF4233ka.jpg


Regards: Carsten
 
Last edited:
The pics do look soft compared to other cameras from that era, and compared to the latest generation like the Olympus stylus one (see robin wongs pics )

It is still worth having a conversation with other users of this camera.

sample below from the lx3 similar specs





p514703853.jpg




--
Kevin Coppalotti
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top