Watching TV

Trafford

Veteran Member
Messages
8,255
Solutions
1
Reaction score
349
Location
US
Where do you place your 32 inch (or larger) TV for the best viewing.

On eye level, or higher like on the wall.
 
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
How pretentious, snobbish and outdated! As with most things in life it's all about moderation. To not own a TV in this day and age is to miss out on a fantastic educational tool.

No one is saying you have to watch the trashy "reality" TV nor the mind numbing soaps but the quality of some documentaries available is superb and in some cases better than learning about the subject matter from any text book. Also as a photography fan some of the cinematography in HD documentaries is particularly appealing and impressive.
 
Eye level (slightly above, actually) when sitting.
 
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
You have a point, however, people like myself, & many much worse off, enjoy wathching TV at times when my body won't do what I want it to!! :-( I watch mostly sports, documentaries & comedy quizes. I read a lot also, mainly detective novels, mostly James Paterson [his chapters are only 3-4 pages long & my concentration levels are short.] Biographies mostly sportsmen, & of course photography mags. I spend quite a bit of time on DPR, as I have contact with some very nice people, just for a chat on PM. As for the OP's question: Eyes in middle of screen. Not deliberate, in fact I have only just noticed!!
 
And perpendicular to your face. Most tv's have IPS screens thus viewing angle is not as critical.
 
Eye level about 1/4 of the way up the screen. Any lower and it interferes with bifocals, which the yardcoyote has been wearing since the age of 21. Any higher and it is too difficult to multitask on compatible activities like drawing , editing, looking through magazines, and reading the DPReview forums on your tablet. I like TVs on the wall in place where I'm normally standing or sitting up high, like in lobbies or bars, but not in a house where I want to sit comfortably and draw.
 
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
How pretentious, snobbish and outdated! As with most things in life it's all about moderation. To not own a TV in this day and age is to miss out on a fantastic educational tool.

No one is saying you have to watch the trashy "reality" TV nor the mind numbing soaps but the quality of some documentaries available is superb and in some cases better than learning about the subject matter from any text book. Also as a photography fan some of the cinematography in HD documentaries is particularly appealing and impressive.
So you think that sitting watching TV is better than learning to play a musical instrument, or learning a new language, or volunteering time to a local charity, or doing stuff with your kids, or painting, or having a lovely meal in a beautiful restaurant with someone you love?

TV is a substitute for experience.

It's better to have the experience.

Is it better to watch a documentary about Mexico, than it is to go to Mexico?

You should do what you want, but do remember that when you are sitting in front of your TV, 'learning things,' that the seconds and minutes of your life, are ticking away in the background.

You can't get them back - when they're gone, they're gone.
 
Last edited:
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
How pretentious, snobbish and outdated! As with most things in life it's all about moderation. To not own a TV in this day and age is to miss out on a fantastic educational tool.

No one is saying you have to watch the trashy "reality" TV nor the mind numbing soaps but the quality of some documentaries available is superb and in some cases better than learning about the subject matter from any text book. Also as a photography fan some of the cinematography in HD documentaries is particularly appealing and impressive.
So you think that sitting watching TV is better than learning to play a musical instrument, or learning a new language, or volunteering time to a local charity, or doing stuff with your kids, or painting, or having a lovely meal in a beautiful restaurant with someone you love?
Not better, but just as good. Life is about variety and I value sitting down and watching one of my favourite TV shows or an all time favourite movie as much as the things you list.
 
Last edited:
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
How pretentious, snobbish and outdated! As with most things in life it's all about moderation. To not own a TV in this day and age is to miss out on a fantastic educational tool.

No one is saying you have to watch the trashy "reality" TV nor the mind numbing soaps but the quality of some documentaries available is superb and in some cases better than learning about the subject matter from any text book. Also as a photography fan some of the cinematography in HD documentaries is particularly appealing and impressive.
So you think that sitting watching TV is better than learning to play a musical instrument, or learning a new language, or volunteering time to a local charity, or doing stuff with your kids, or painting, or having a lovely meal in a beautiful restaurant with someone you love?
Not better, but just as good. Life is about variety and I value sitting down and watching one of my favourite TV shows or an all time favourite movie as much as the things you list.
Yes, I take your point :-)
 
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
Granted that the thread is off topic, but your reply was nothing more than an attempt at elitism & smugness. I hope you feel better about yourself, I would hate to think your reply was a waste of time.
 
My 40" TV is situated so that the bottom of the screen is at eye level and that is by design of the entertainment cabinet

QUOTE: Where to mount your TV

"Ideally, the middle of your TV screen needs to be at about eye level while you're seated. You'll want to be comfortable while watching TV, and mounting it too high can result in neck strain. Plus, you'll probably see the best-looking picture when you view your TV head-on, rather than at an angle. If you opt for a higher placement, consider using a tilting wall mount to angle the TV down."

See about midway down their article on TV placement and more tips on placing your TV for optimum viewing.

--
"Five out of four people have trouble with fractions."
Regards,
Hank
 
Last edited:
I don't own a TV, so I can't contribute to this thread, except to say that are many better ways of spending the time, than gawping passively at a television.
David Attenborough.

nuff said :D
 
Ya know, we seem to forget about the old TV's we've had for 50 years before. Remember the large TV consoles that were like furniture?.........the screen's center was about 18-20" from the floor and we never complained about them.......

f42f175e913b45189e60642dfe96637d.jpg

Today most flat screens are generally positioned either wall mounted or atop a furniture stand raising the centers at a much higher level.........

0af6729880b84a3bbdb8b291e4816675.jpg



2e84564ec6f548a495b15727f96c4482.jpg



--
"Five out of four people have trouble with fractions."
Regards,
Hank
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top