Great Little Camera

Alan Ernst

Well-known member
Messages
121
Reaction score
200
Location
CA
Took this mini marvel on vacation to Hawaii where I used it extensively. Very pleased with handling and performance. I agree with much of DP Review’s findings with a few exceptions.

It certainly deserves the gold award...

Mostly a GX1 user for the past two years, my comparisons are in relation to GX1. I rarely use video, have not done any RAW conversions so far (which are covered by DP), so won’t comment on any of these.

Pro’s: very small size / weight; feature rich; fast and very quiet to totally silent if needed; great LCD screen resolution and responsive touch screen implementation; good ergonomics; very customizable to individual shooting style; good intelligent Auto feature; excellent image stabilisation; focuses fast and well; good bracketing range; probably the best kit lens from Lumix so far!

This camera is great value for money!

Many useful features such as multiple exposure, HDR (unfortunately limited to jpeg only setting), interval timer, choice of resetting self-timer and exposure compensation when powering down, etc.

Con’s: most “issues” have to do with the small size and are the prize you pay for a pocketable MFT camera, i.e.: smallish battery (150-175 images per charge in real live including the odd flash and normal use of playback to check image quality), minimum of designated control buttons, need for a tripod adapter when using lenses other than the kit lens, small controls making it almost impossible for use in the dark or cold weather, weak flash, somewhat slow lens, tight lens mount makes switching lenses hard, etc.. All of the above I can live with and will likely get used to over time (or then can fall back on one of its larger siblings if required).

My major complaints so far are issues which could have been designed and implemented better by Panasonic, i.e. manual focusing is very difficult via the touch screen (no focussing ring); flash sync speed of 1/50sec is unacceptably slow and makes it useless for daylight fill flash; no possibility for remote release other than using i-phone with an extra app (there should be a small wireless remote accessory); again no possibility to combine self-timer and bracketing; the multi-function control ring is overly sensitive to touch, which leads to constantly changing the wrong settings; whereas the video button is recessed to avoid inadvertent video capture, the LCD is flush with the rest of the body, which leads to constantly misplacing the AF area in the top right corner (a small ridge beside the LCD could prevent this); battery / memory card slot at the bottom rather than on the side, which would avoid the need for removing quick release plate all the time...

In day to day use, I find the GM1 with the 12-32 kit lens well balanced and it is still ok to use with most Lumix lenses, except the very large ones such as the 35-100 or 100-300. With the 45-175mm PZ X lens it actually works very well, providing a great zoom range from 24-350mm equivalent with two compact lenses. Add the 20mm f1.7 for low light and you’re good to go. I don’t see a need for the extra (overpriced and ugly) accessory grip, but if you use tripod and other lenses, you will need the tripod adapter for sure.

The 12-32mm kit lens performs better than the 14-42mm OIS II kit lens on the GX7 or the 14-42mm PZ X. It has a limited but very useful zoom range and surprisingly consistent image quality. It does not focus very close (12cm x 9cm) but sharpness at close range is pretty good across the image. Some barrel distortion and corner softness at 12mm (the latter at wide open) but generally it is quite sharp from wide open to around f8 at all focal lengths, getting noticeably softer though at smaller apertures over f8. Used at f 5.0 – f 7.1, results are very good and this miniature lens actually compares favourably to the expensive 12-35mm f2.8 at many settings (except at 12-14mm wide open).

The sensor performance is comparable to the 16MP sensor of the GX1 at low sensitivities, but performs distinctly better from ISO 400 upwards. I like the extended ISO feature which allows settings below the base ISO of 200. Whereas dynamic range is greater around ISO 200, reducing the risk of clipping highlights, I find that where this is not an issue, image quality at the lower setting of ISO 125 is actually better. As for the intelligent Dynamic range I don’t think it adds that much. At lower ISO’s there is some improvement, but at higher sensitivity settings, the benefits are outweighed by increased noise and loss of detail. As for noise, at high ISO settings and normal shutter speeds IQ has vastly improved (1-2 stops), but colour noise at ISO > 400 and slow shutter speeds is unacceptable.

Autofocus is fast and accurate, which is good as manual focusing is not very easy with GM1.
White balance disappoints, with colour casts in many situations. Jpeg shooters will need to keep an eye on that constantly.

The GM1 is great fun to use and performs very well in most aspects. It should work well for most enthusiasts and snap-shooters alike. Exceptions are: if you have very large hands, need to constantly change settings (such as ISO, image stabilisation, AE mode, etc.), regularly need to work very fast or do a lot of action photography, in cold temperatures, low light or with manual focusing.
 
Hi

Thank you for the review. I have assigned the iso to the function button and find it very easy to change on the fly.
 
A very informative and helpful review.
 
Yes it is, really a great small camera.
 
Well, my GAS really kicked in right before Christmas....I decided I wanted a small M43 backup body for an upcoming trip overseas. I decided on (and ordered) the EPL-5 rather than the GM-1. Now (before even receiving the EPL-5) I'm wondering if I made a mistake..... Those of you who have purchased the GM-1 must have considered the EPL-5....I am interested in knowing what your rationale was for getting the GM-1. Not being a troll here....looking for a reason to either stick with my choice or send it back......

Thanks.
 
Well, my GAS really kicked in right before Christmas....I decided I wanted a small M43 backup body for an upcoming trip overseas. I decided on (and ordered) the EPL-5 rather than the GM-1. Now (before even receiving the EPL-5) I'm wondering if I made a mistake..... Those of you who have purchased the GM-1 must have considered the EPL-5....I am interested in knowing what your rationale was for getting the GM-1. Not being a troll here....looking for a reason to either stick with my choice or send it back......

Thanks.
 
Well, my GAS really kicked in right before Christmas....I decided I wanted a small M43 backup body for an upcoming trip overseas. I decided on (and ordered) the EPL-5 rather than the GM-1. Now (before even receiving the EPL-5) I'm wondering if I made a mistake..... Those of you who have purchased the GM-1 must have considered the EPL-5....I am interested in knowing what your rationale was for getting the GM-1. Not being a troll here....looking for a reason to either stick with my choice or send it back......

Thanks.
 
How did the lcd do in bright sunlight? Could you compose at least?
 
Well, my GAS really kicked in right before Christmas....I decided I wanted a small M43 backup body for an upcoming trip overseas. I decided on (and ordered) the EPL-5 rather than the GM-1. Now (before even receiving the EPL-5) I'm wondering if I made a mistake..... Those of you who have purchased the GM-1 must have considered the EPL-5....I am interested in knowing what your rationale was for getting the GM-1. Not being a troll here....looking for a reason to either stick with my choice or send it back......

Thanks.
 
It certainly deserves the gold award...

Many useful features such as multiple exposure, HDR (unfortunately limited to jpeg only setting), interval timer, choice of resetting self-timer and exposure compensation when powering down, etc.
Great info, thanks for sharing. Could you elaborate on the multiple exposure function? Does it auto align for NR, or is this for ghosting on purpose (superimposing)?
 
Last edited:
Many thanks for your excellent and well balanced review, Alan.

Some have suggested the E-PM1/2 and E-PL5 are competitors to the GM1. I suppose they are in a way -- but they are really not nearly small enough.

I had a G1 and an LX3 as an "outfit". The LX3 was the walk-around, pocket camera and did very well in that role EXCEPT it simply did not deliver the image quality of m43.

I decided a couple of years ago to replace the two cameras with one by going for compactness and lightness with the E-PM1 and was a very early adopter. I bought a VF-3 viewfinder with it.

It was a good move overall but after 4-5 months, I decided to upgrade to the E-PL3 -- marginally bigger and heavier but offering the tilting LCD and some other advantages -- and to the VF-2 for superior viewing.

This was a good move too -- but the fact was that it was a compromise. I missed some pictures I would have taken with the LX3 because the E-PM1 and E-PL3 simply were not quite as small and handy, and there were some things I could have done better with the G1 (except that its JPEGs were not as good as the Olympus ones).

Now I am returning to the Panny G series with the G6 -- which, in fact, is marginally SMALLER than the E-PL3/5 with the VF-2 and lens fitted -- and the GM1 which is positively tiny and will do the job the LX3 did only better!

I have been carrying the E-PL3 with me wherever I go, but mostly it has to be in my backpack rather than in my cargo pants pocket or small shoulder bag. There have been quite a few times when it was just impossible to get it out and take that momentary picture -- that snapshot -- or to have it to hand to take a quality picture which appeared during a casual occasion, such as a scene observed during a family outing.

The GM1's extremely small size and light weight mean it will be to hand all the time. The quality of its sensor and lens mean I will get quality images when unexpected opportunities arise. I have even been picking out pictures I will take with it! :)

And in addition, if the G6 fails, I will have a stand-by camera that will do a substantial proportion of the jobs I do.

Cheers, geoff
 
Last edited:
I've owned the Canon S90, the Lumix LX3, GF3 and G3 and was always frustrated by their small sensor, low ISO limits, relatively slow focus or just bad IQ. I initially bought the GX7 and think its a great camera. Yes there's a couple of things I don't like. The slow response to activate the EVF and the blackout after shooting a picture. I'd like Auto ISO in manual but that's a stupid software decision on Panasonic's part. But everything else rocks. Small sharp lenses, great ISO limits, snap focus especially with the 17mm I just got, double thumbwheels and great IQ. The GM1 is basically the same camera with missing features due to its size. The camera got the Gold and so should have the GX7. Two of the best cameras I've ever owned. The GM1 is a gem. Made like a swiss watch and a joy to shoot with.
 
The GM1 is well made, but there's plenty of plastic, both in honest black and in faux metal plating (not to mention synthetic leather). The flash mechanism is hardly an example of fine craftsmanship and design. The multifunction dial is poorly executed.

The camera can be forgiven its poor handling to deliver the sensor performance at its small size. But I wouldn't recommend it to anyone unless small camera size is their primary concern, and if they only intend to primarily use the kit lens or a pancake lens.
 
Sir either it's well made or it's not but it can't be both. Read your sentence before you hit the send button. Have to agree it's well made and disagree it's not. Not real leather? Shocking. Neither is the $6000 D4. Whats wrong with the flash. Brilliant design in a small camera. Personally I like my Nikon SB900 more but it 100 times the size. Multifunction dial works fine. The click wheel never moves unlike made other cameras. Poor handling? I put my 12mm on it, put it in manual mode and prefocus it and it's a Leica without the heft and the cost. I guess it won the Gold award on DPreview just because it's small and not because it's Gold.

The GM1 is well made, but there's plenty of plastic, both in honest black and in faux metal plating (not to mention synthetic leather). The flash mechanism is hardly an example of fine craftsmanship and design. The multifunction dial is poorly executed.

The camera can be forgiven its poor handling to deliver the sensor performance at its small size. But I wouldn't recommend it to anyone unless small camera size is their primary concern, and if they only intend to primarily use the kit lens or a pancake lens.

--
BJ Nicholls
SLC, UT
 
Took this mini marvel on vacation to Hawaii where I used it extensively. Very pleased with handling and performance. I agree with much of DP Review’s findings with a few exceptions.

It certainly deserves the gold award...

Mostly a GX1 user for the past two years, my comparisons are in relation to GX1. I rarely use video, have not done any RAW conversions so far (which are covered by DP), so won’t comment on any of these.

Pro’s: very small size / weight; feature rich; fast and very quiet to totally silent if needed; great LCD screen resolution and responsive touch screen implementation; good ergonomics; very customizable to individual shooting style; good intelligent Auto feature; excellent image stabilisation; focuses fast and well; good bracketing range; probably the best kit lens from Lumix so far!

This camera is great value for money!

Many useful features such as multiple exposure, HDR (unfortunately limited to jpeg only setting), interval timer, choice of resetting self-timer and exposure compensation when powering down, etc.

Con’s: most “issues” have to do with the small size and are the prize you pay for a pocketable MFT camera, i.e.: smallish battery (150-175 images per charge in real live including the odd flash and normal use of playback to check image quality), minimum of designated control buttons, need for a tripod adapter when using lenses other than the kit lens, small controls making it almost impossible for use in the dark or cold weather, weak flash, somewhat slow lens, tight lens mount makes switching lenses hard, etc.. All of the above I can live with and will likely get used to over time (or then can fall back on one of its larger siblings if required).

My major complaints so far are issues which could have been designed and implemented better by Panasonic, i.e. manual focusing is very difficult via the touch screen (no focussing ring); flash sync speed of 1/50sec is unacceptably slow and makes it useless for daylight fill flash; no possibility for remote release other than using i-phone with an extra app (there should be a small wireless remote accessory); again no possibility to combine self-timer and bracketing; the multi-function control ring is overly sensitive to touch, which leads to constantly changing the wrong settings; whereas the video button is recessed to avoid inadvertent video capture, the LCD is flush with the rest of the body, which leads to constantly misplacing the AF area in the top right corner (a small ridge beside the LCD could prevent this); battery / memory card slot at the bottom rather than on the side, which would avoid the need for removing quick release plate all the time...

In day to day use, I find the GM1 with the 12-32 kit lens well balanced and it is still ok to use with most Lumix lenses, except the very large ones such as the 35-100 or 100-300. With the 45-175mm PZ X lens it actually works very well, providing a great zoom range from 24-350mm equivalent with two compact lenses. Add the 20mm f1.7 for low light and you’re good to go. I don’t see a need for the extra (overpriced and ugly) accessory grip, but if you use tripod and other lenses, you will need the tripod adapter for sure.

The 12-32mm kit lens performs better than the 14-42mm OIS II kit lens on the GX7 or the 14-42mm PZ X. It has a limited but very useful zoom range and surprisingly consistent image quality. It does not focus very close (12cm x 9cm) but sharpness at close range is pretty good across the image. Some barrel distortion and corner softness at 12mm (the latter at wide open) but generally it is quite sharp from wide open to around f8 at all focal lengths, getting noticeably softer though at smaller apertures over f8. Used at f 5.0 – f 7.1, results are very good and this miniature lens actually compares favourably to the expensive 12-35mm f2.8 at many settings (except at 12-14mm wide open).

The sensor performance is comparable to the 16MP sensor of the GX1 at low sensitivities, but performs distinctly better from ISO 400 upwards. I like the extended ISO feature which allows settings below the base ISO of 200. Whereas dynamic range is greater around ISO 200, reducing the risk of clipping highlights, I find that where this is not an issue, image quality at the lower setting of ISO 125 is actually better. As for the intelligent Dynamic range I don’t think it adds that much. At lower ISO’s there is some improvement, but at higher sensitivity settings, the benefits are outweighed by increased noise and loss of detail. As for noise, at high ISO settings and normal shutter speeds IQ has vastly improved (1-2 stops), but colour noise at ISO > 400 and slow shutter speeds is unacceptable.

Autofocus is fast and accurate, which is good as manual focusing is not very easy with GM1.
White balance disappoints, with colour casts in many situations. Jpeg shooters will need to keep an eye on that constantly.

The GM1 is great fun to use and performs very well in most aspects. It should work well for most enthusiasts and snap-shooters alike. Exceptions are: if you have very large hands, need to constantly change settings (such as ISO, image stabilisation, AE mode, etc.), regularly need to work very fast or do a lot of action photography, in cold temperatures, low light or with manual focusing.
Good review and I mostly agree.
Just one thing, you don't have to use the touch screen to manual focus the 12-32mm. You can assign the rear control dial, and while not great, it's still much better than using the touch screen IMO
--
Let the light guide you...
 
How is AF is less than ideal conditions and with moving objects?
 
The GM1 is well made, but there's plenty of plastic, both in honest black and in faux metal plating (not to mention synthetic leather). The flash mechanism is hardly an example of fine craftsmanship and design. The multifunction dial is poorly executed.

The camera can be forgiven its poor handling to deliver the sensor performance at its small size. But I wouldn't recommend it to anyone unless small camera size is their primary concern, and if they only intend to primarily use the kit lens or a pancake lens.
 
The GM1 is well made, but there's plenty of plastic, both in honest black and in faux metal plating (not to mention synthetic leather). The flash mechanism is hardly an example of fine craftsmanship and design. The multifunction dial is poorly executed.

The camera can be forgiven its poor handling to deliver the sensor performance at its small size. But I wouldn't recommend it to anyone unless small camera size is their primary concern, and if they only intend to primarily use the kit lens or a pancake lens.
 
The GM1 is well made, but there's plenty of plastic, both in honest black and in faux metal plating (not to mention synthetic leather). The flash mechanism is hardly an example of fine craftsmanship and design. The multifunction dial is poorly executed.
"Magnesium-alloy shell with aluminum top and bottom plates" (from this website) as well as machined dials on the top. What else do you want? Where is the "faux metal plating"? Expecting genuine leather on this camera is kinda crazy, imo.

--
-Really there is a God... And She loves you and wants you to buy camera gear!
 
Last edited:
pero ao que raw te refieres a foto o a video.

A foto lo tiene, tiene raw y jpg. En video es una locura pensar que una cámara como esta grabe en raw. Si con 2000 euros más si.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top