Sony commited to expanding A-mount

Anderton wrote:

Your post, like all your others that are focused only on the equipment you own Sony a57 and Tamron and Minolta lens, makes no sense.
Would it make more sense to you if you owned that camera? He's not talking specifically about the A57. He's talking about A mount. That's what this whole discussion is about.
Sony's product line up and business sense, and respective customers, does not revolve around that thank goodness.
Who claims it should? Nobody.
 
Photography Blog cites the Sony announcements in London. Seems a spot of good news to me. Should be interesting to see what Sony cooks up.

 
They release a lens roadmap for the E-Mount 15 or so lens all the way to 2015.

They did not release and haven't in recent time released any form of roadmap for A- mount.

What we do see if 1 $3000 Full Frame Lens being released.

Everything still lines up the way I see the Future. They will continue with A-mount for high-end or Full Frame camera and lenses.

However, I still think it's likely you will see less focus on APS-C cameras for A-Mount.

Bottom line, there is no new information available today on what are the future plans for A-mount.
 
RichV wrote:
sensibill wrote:

One G lens does not mean A mount cameras are forthcoming. The guy clearly avoided mentioning any plans for A mount bodies, the same way all Sony reps are, lately.

"We're fully committed to A mount." ...And immediately goes on to say FF E mount will be 'the best' and up-sells the LA-EA4 adapter.

"Let's say you have an A99 or A77. You can adapt it with the EA3 adapter or EA4 adapter. You can turn this camera into an SLT and get everything you get with that camera with this camera."

I don't get any sense from this that they're planning any more A mount bodies.
Brian is certainly a voice for Sony: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52339019
Again, he doesn't say anything different there.

'Not going away' for Sony can mean just about anything.

The new G lens, possibly another lens after that, and adapters. He even said 'you can do everything on an A7 with the LA-EA4 that you can do with an SLT' (which doesn't appear to be true re: IBIS but that's beside the point).

Remember, Sony has a vested interest in keeping people buying A mount for the time being, even if they plan to sunset the system. And they have a history of very slow ends to their product lines.
 
sensibill wrote:
RichV wrote:
sensibill wrote:

One G lens does not mean A mount cameras are forthcoming. The guy clearly avoided mentioning any plans for A mount bodies, the same way all Sony reps are, lately.

"We're fully committed to A mount." ...And immediately goes on to say FF E mount will be 'the best' and up-sells the LA-EA4 adapter.

"Let's say you have an A99 or A77. You can adapt it with the EA3 adapter or EA4 adapter. You can turn this camera into an SLT and get everything you get with that camera with this camera."

I don't get any sense from this that they're planning any more A mount bodies.
Brian is certainly a voice for Sony: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52339019
Again, he doesn't say anything different there.

'Not going away' for Sony can mean just about anything.

The new G lens, possibly another lens after that, and adapters. He even said 'you can do everything on an A7 with the LA-EA4 that you can do with an SLT' (which doesn't appear to be true re: IBIS but that's beside the point).

Remember, Sony has a vested interest in keeping people buying A mount for the time being, even if they plan to sunset the system. And they have a history of very slow ends to their product lines.
There's no clear answer, but I'd put my best guess on new A-mount bodies next year. Sony DOES use A-mount on dedicated video cameras, and they DON'T announce any fast lenses for the A7/R because it would defeat the purpose of the form factor. Brian's statement about "doing anything" is just a part of the whole play; it's ridiculous to discuss A-mount bodies at the inauguration of the A7/R - A-mount will have its turn next year.

Here's a SAR clip from the end of May. I haven't seen anything that changes that, but feel free to update me. With this view, the picture makes more sense:

"Two months ago I gave you a shock by telling you that Sony canceled the planed A-mount camera releases for 2013. This means not entry level FF, not high end FF and not A77 successor will come within the next 6 months. The reason why Sony dropped them is that the new CEO wants to really challenge the Canon-Nikon dominance in the only profitable pro camera market. And to achieve that goal the new cameras have to be not just a small upgrade but a real new big step forward over the predecessors. I am now working on the new A-mount roadmap. And I got some reliable info about the new Full Frame strategy:

1) Two new A-mount Full Frame cameras coming in 2014
2) There is a third A-mount Full Frame camera planed but it may be released in early 2015.
3) All new Full Frame cameras will be mirrorless (this means DSLR shape, A-mount, but no SLT mirror).
4) Both cameras will use a new generation 30+ MP sensor (yes, I said new and not the same of the Nikon D800…it’s better!)."
 
sensibill wrote:
RichV wrote:
sensibill wrote:

One G lens does not mean A mount cameras are forthcoming. The guy clearly avoided mentioning any plans for A mount bodies, the same way all Sony reps are, lately.

"We're fully committed to A mount." ...And immediately goes on to say FF E mount will be 'the best' and up-sells the LA-EA4 adapter.

"Let's say you have an A99 or A77. You can adapt it with the EA3 adapter or EA4 adapter. You can turn this camera into an SLT and get everything you get with that camera with this camera."

I don't get any sense from this that they're planning any more A mount bodies.
Brian is certainly a voice for Sony: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/52339019
Again, he doesn't say anything different there.

'Not going away' for Sony can mean just about anything.

The new G lens, possibly another lens after that, and adapters. He even said 'you can do everything on an A7 with the LA-EA4 that you can do with an SLT' (which doesn't appear to be true re: IBIS but that's beside the point).

Remember, Sony has a vested interest in keeping people buying A mount for the time being, even if they plan to sunset the system. And they have a history of very slow ends to their product lines.
I very much agree with just about everything you've been saying about all of this. I'm now actually thinking that Sony decided a while ago that the A58 was a last one, as a tool, to bridge the time it takes to push more E-mount and NEX style bodies and lenses, and to keep being able clear out any current A-mount lenses out of the pipeline, like the popular 18-135 one.

I'm ok with all of this, except for that darn IBIS loss plus having to spend money on an adapter, and the ludicrous E-mount lens prices. For like another $500 one can have a third party adapter that lets you use Canon lenses with AF and OS functionality...

It's all just about money isn't it... And lots and lots of it with this new stage. It's one helluva marketing effort at Sony.... I mean good grief. $1700 on an A7. $800 on a single E-mount lens. $300 on an adapter so I can play with my $100 Minolta beercan. Last question would be, are those new cameras not too thin and are they going to fall out of my hand? The A57 I can hang off the tip of my fingers without having to grip even. Looks like the A7 would slip right off my fingers... lol.
 
jdm_777 wrote:

How can Alpha A-mount compete in the pro market with that price and design?

How can the Ford F250 compete with the F150 price point... Different cameras for different needs.

PRos can use the smaller camera.. I think it will be very popular as a 2nd camera etc.

They are not going to drop full DSLR even if the fact that they have to deal with what the customer expects them to carry.

Pros this is a business expense and in a kit easily over $10-15K or more the price difference is not a decider.
 
123Mike wrote:

That A57 and A77 firmware upgrade never came for instance....
I hadn't heard about those, but regardless it feels pretty clear to me that Sony doesn't want to impinge on their A-mount FF plans (I also tend to look at the overall reliability of the bigger rumors that I hear; for Sony, firmware's a small issue in most cases unless the Press is harping on something). I don't have a sure feeling about APS-C, but if the new person in charge wants to take it to the competition in a much stronger way, FF A-mount would be the way to go. (And as Canon and Nikon do, they could then trickle the tech downward.) With E-mount and A-mount I see two distinct markets: compact and full-sized. I'd think it would be "mildly suicidal" for Sony to talk about future A-mount directions now - both from a pov of sabotaging the FE line (which IS a huge thing for them - a relatively unchallenged arena for them now, and the ability to blend the NEX success and good feelings with the Alpha name) and because, if they're truly trying to take it to the competition, they're still working hard on it.
 
K E Hoffman wrote:
jdm_777 wrote:

How can Alpha A-mount compete in the pro market with that price and design?
How can the Ford F250 compete with the F150 price point... Different cameras for different needs.

PRos can use the smaller camera.. I think it will be very popular as a 2nd camera etc.

They are not going to drop full DSLR even if the fact that they have to deal with what the customer expects them to carry.

Pros this is a business expense and in a kit easily over $10-15K or more the price difference is not a decider.
I mostly agree, although for certain types of pro's this could easily be their only system. And Sony really needs the cache of the pro endorsement - that's why they're getting rid of the NEX name: it's already strong enough with people who own other brands, and with future bodies they'll start referring to it as Alpha. I think it's a good direction all around, and that next year's A-mount bodies will also be something different from Sony.
 
70-200mm F2.8 for $2998 with no weather sealing and no optical improvements. What pro would interested in that? Even with a new A-mount mirrorless camera.
K E Hoffman wrote:
jdm_777 wrote:

How can Alpha A-mount compete in the pro market with that price and design?
How can the Ford F250 compete with the F150 price point... Different cameras for different needs.

PRos can use the smaller camera.. I think it will be very popular as a 2nd camera etc.

They are not going to drop full DSLR even if the fact that they have to deal with what the customer expects them to carry.

Pros this is a business expense and in a kit easily over $10-15K or more the price difference is not a decider.

--
K.E.H. >> Shooting between raindrops in WA<<
 
jdm_777 wrote:

70-200mm F2.8 for $2998 with no weather sealing and no optical improvements. What pro would interested in that? Even with a new A-mount mirrorless camera.
I think I'll wait until I see some testing results.
 
RichV wrote:
K E Hoffman wrote:
jdm_777 wrote:

How can Alpha A-mount compete in the pro market with that price and design?
How can the Ford F250 compete with the F150 price point... Different cameras for different needs.

PRos can use the smaller camera.. I think it will be very popular as a 2nd camera etc.

They are not going to drop full DSLR even if the fact that they have to deal with what the customer expects them to carry.

Pros this is a business expense and in a kit easily over $10-15K or more the price difference is not a decider.
I mostly agree, although for certain types of pro's this could easily be their only system. And Sony really needs the cache of the pro endorsement - that's why they're getting rid of the NEX name: it's already strong enough with people who own other brands, and with future bodies they'll start referring to it as Alpha. I think it's a good direction all around, and that next year's A-mount bodies will also be something different from Sony.
 
RichV wrote:

One of the bigger problems with this type of camera is that at the longer end of the FL the quality turns to junk. If Sony has solved this, I'd have no problems getting rid of my APS-C bodies and using it exclusively. (Of course, I'd keep my 1D Mk IV for action!)

--
Rich
I am also thinking of an old Cyber shot currently in my camera bag: Sony F828. That lens (28-200mm equiv., f/2-2.8), also a Zeiss Vario-Sonnar, performs beautifully at all focal lengths in terms of sharpness and distortion control for a 7-8x zoom. So, to me, the RX10 is really a revival of the good old F828, albeit with a 4x larger sensor. And today, if F828 has a limitation, that would be the old sensor and RX10 addresses it well with a proven larger sensor.

But, it looks like I will miss manual zoom that I loved about the F828, as the RX10 appears to have taken the Power Zoom route.
 
Last edited:
EinsteinsGhost wrote:
RichV wrote:

One of the bigger problems with this type of camera is that at the longer end of the FL the quality turns to junk. If Sony has solved this, I'd have no problems getting rid of my APS-C bodies and using it exclusively. (Of course, I'd keep my 1D Mk IV for action!)
 
Canadianguy wrote:

That is very interesting about the news of expansion of the A-mount or at least the upcoming arrival of 1 new A-mount lens - will that be the last lens or is their a multi-year road-map. Or will be the same as Olympus and the 4/3 mount - still manufacturing but don't expect anything new to be release for the mount.

But it would be interesting to see the marketing message behind the 35mm A-mount vs 35mm E-mount - aka FE lenses.

Why get one over the other.
Sony would prefer to sell you two ILCs: Ax-series (E-mount) for portability and Axx-series (A-mount) for speed. And E-mount is an excellent tool to eat into established markets (namely, Canon and Nikon), because it is very different. It would be a tall order, if not impossible, with A-mount since there is minimal differentiation. With portability as a key point to sell, and adaptability as a catalyst as those who currently own Canon and Nikon DSLRs but could use a smaller body for their use, but still want to consider trying the new guy with their existing lens collection (bodies are less important at higher end than are the lenses that go with it), the E-mount offers that choice. And Sony believes that they will fall in love with the camera, enough to start considering A-mount system as well.

As for lens road map, the E-mount needed it because it is a new system. It allows those interested in the new cameras to visualize building a system around it, in the foreseeable future. As it is, 35/2.8, 55/1.8 and 28-70/3.5-5.6 are available at launch. So, a buyer will consider what other options are available, or if they will be. In a few months, 24-70/4 and 70-200/4 will be added, so that gives early adopters a chance to consider adding more.

OTOH, if Sony announces a road map for A-mount, that they will introduce a 70-200/4, or a 150mm f/3.5 macro lens, there really isn't the impact or need for it. The A-mount is nearly 30 years old.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top