TantalizingLightBeams
Well-known member
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
Umbris wrote:
Demand for wedding and portrait photographers will continue as people continue to get married
Alan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
Umbris wrote:
Demand for wedding and portrait photographers will continue as people continue to get married
Alan
markhayphotography wrote:
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
I could go to weddings and get similar shots of fat women shooting weddings. I was hired by one last summer to second shoot for her as her other 'fat female friend' was having surgery. The two of them work at the local HS as teachers, one is the yearbook advisor.DenWil wrote:
You are publishing fat women taking snaps of each other in a park.
And yes, they shoot seniors too.
But at least, for now, they use canon dSLRs and L lenses and flash.
That's an 8% or so decline in weddings in the past 6 years. That's a pretty significant drop consider the population is growing.The United States Marriage Rate is at a century low, according to the 2013 edition of the U.S. Wedding Forecast from Demographic Intelligence. Driven by a sluggish economic recovery and shifting cultural support for marriage, the marriage rate in the U.S. is predicted to remain at a century low of 6.8 marriages per 1,000 population this year, down from a rate of 7.3 per 1,000 in 2007
Umbris wrote:
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
Umbris wrote:
Demand for wedding and portrait photographers will continue as people continue to get married
Alan
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
This is the third post I"ve responded to on this forum made by people that are CLUELESS. Totally clueless.
http://www.livescience.com/38308-us-marriage-rate-new-low.html
http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/hea...te-plummets/Mz96razlJ8dw19uHpOuS9J/story.html
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/6/prweb10844370.htm
let me quote
That's an 8% or so decline in weddings in the past 6 years. That's a pretty significant drop consider the population is growing.The United States Marriage Rate is at a century low, according to the 2013 edition of the U.S. Wedding Forecast from Demographic Intelligence. Driven by a sluggish economic recovery and shifting cultural support for marriage, the marriage rate in the U.S. is predicted to remain at a century low of 6.8 marriages per 1,000 population this year, down from a rate of 7.3 per 1,000 in 2007
Umbris wrote:
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
Umbris wrote:
Demand for wedding and portrait photographers will continue as people continue to get married
Alan
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
markhayphotography wrote:
PenguinPhotoCo wrote:
I could go to weddings and get similar shots of fat women shooting weddings. I was hired by one last summer to second shoot for her as her other 'fat female friend' was having surgery. The two of them work at the local HS as teachers, one is the yearbook advisor.DenWil wrote:
You are publishing fat women taking snaps of each other in a park.
And yes, they shoot seniors too.
But at least, for now, they use canon dSLRs and L lenses and flash.
PenguinPhotoCo wrote
Doesn't that count as an answer to your original question?I have more seniors booked for the next week than I've shot in oct/nov/dec combined in years past.
John Motts wrote:
Doesn't that count as an answer to your original question?PenguinPhotoCo wrote
I have more seniors booked for the next week than I've shot in oct/nov/dec combined in years past.
Biggs23 wrote:I've posted several, so have others. You just choose to ignore them.
But here, I'll gift you some good news: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes274021.htm
In summary, the average photographer is making $36,330 a year. Not fantastic but not terrible, either. Remove from the mix photographers working at amusement parks and whatnot and that number would definitely go up.
So yeah, stop your belly-aching and realize that the 'industry' is actually doing pretty well!
The question is when they started to assemble the numbers for that report.Biggs23 wrote:
Incorrect. That was actually provided by the Bureau of Labor and they do factor in growth.Hulamike wrote:
And in reference to the guy who says there will be a 13% growth rate in photography over the next decade, he forgot to factor in population growth. Seems like it will flatline or decrease actually.
--
Any opinions I express are my own and do not represent DPReview. Have a good one and God bless!
If you don't enjoy something any more, why waste your life on the negative, life is too short. Do something else. Make photography a hobby or something. Your are one of the most negative persons I've seen in these forums.
If you changed your attitude you might actually get more business. Sounds weird, I know, but it's like the person who gets new clothes, a makeover and a feels great about themselves and then life changes for them. Positive things happen because THEY are happy with themselves. Their outlook on life is positive.
And happiness breeds happiness. If you aren't a joy to be around nobody is going to want to hire you. I hope people don't find out who you are because if I was in the market to find a photographer in your area saw all your posts here there is no way I would ever hire you.
You don't appreciate people or potential clients. So negative.