A77 and why I love DRO

jidery

Well-known member
Messages
212
Solutions
1
Reaction score
90
I may not be your typical A77 owner, I bought this camera to capture what ever life throws at me and my family. About 25% of my shooting is done in a controlled environment, the rest is just me and my camera taking photos. I have found that, when I am out and about, so long as there is good lighting, I will leave DRO turned on to either level 3 or 4. This is largely because I find I have a much higher hit rate of good photos with it turned on. There are times when it doesn't turn out and noise is an issue, but that is why I shoot in RAW + JPG. I have the DROed JPG and an untouched RAW for when that doesn't work.

I cant be the only one who leaves DRO turned on. It has saved more than a handful of photos.



64eb828e9b1843a089fa938cad88b059.jpg

Take this photo for example. My subjects are on a ride in a shadow, yet DRO manage to retain the detail, turning it into a great shot.



9628323e9ac246edb6f52daba616e743.jpg

Here is another great example, once again my subjects are in an area without ideal lighting, yet DRO manages to even the scene while retaining detail.



e6610c276fb44a7a80e08b3afb30d3d1.jpg

While I will typically turn DRO off in low light/high ISO, I still feel like it did a very good job at providing me with a usable photo.

In my opinion the only people DRO isn't good for are the Pixel peepers, everyone else should enjoy this wonderful feature. I have never had a higher photo "hit rate".
 
Thanks for posting this good tip. I have an A65 and had never considered shooting in both RAW and JPEG at the same time with DRO on.
 
jidery wrote:

I may not be your typical A77 owner, I bought this camera to capture what ever life throws at me and my family. About 25% of my shooting is done in a controlled environment, the rest is just me and my camera taking photos. I have found that, when I am out and about, so long as there is good lighting, I will leave DRO turned on to either level 3 or 4. This is largely because I find I have a much higher hit rate of good photos with it turned on. There are times when it doesn't turn out and noise is an issue, but that is why I shoot in RAW + JPG. I have the DROed JPG and an untouched RAW for when that doesn't work.

I cant be the only one who leaves DRO turned on. It has saved more than a handful of photos.

64eb828e9b1843a089fa938cad88b059.jpg
Hi I dont have a 77 but I will try it with my 37 I was messing about with lightzone while looking at your images number 1 looked a fun image so I had a little play around with the it hope you don't mind.



Just say if you want it removed.
 

Attachments

  • 2653023.jpg
    2653023.jpg
    926.2 KB · Views: 0
The shadow detail in #1 is pretty amazing, but I guess it should be at ISO-100. I think #3 might be better from a processed RAW.

I always used DRO on my A-100 shooting jpg. It saved many wildlife photos.
 
Ed at Ridersite wrote:

The shadow detail in #1 is pretty amazing, but I guess it should be at ISO-100. I think #3 might be better from a processed RAW.

I always used DRO on my A-100 shooting jpg. It saved many wildlife photos.

--
AEH
http://aehass.zenfolio.com/
http://aehass.zenfolio.com/blog
Question: What do you do all week?
Answer: Mon to Fri. Nothing, Sat & Sun I rest!
Regarding RAW, I went back and attempted to mimic the effects of DRO with the RAW file this morning.

Here is the out of camera RAW with no lighting or noise correction:



a735770052fb4a519965183c1a5ed334.jpg

Here is my attempt to mimic DRO:

b0a11469dbc24d9cba8da1eb1193856b.jpg

Overall I find the DRO file to be lower in noise and slightly better. Though yes, it is more than possible to achieve a similar photo both ways. This is why I always shoot in RAW + JPG.
 
Good use of a great feature I go the opposite way though, I can never get enough contrast in my photos!
--
James
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top