Patrick Wils
Forum Enthusiast
There are better options for the money...
Good: The blur warning. Tells you that a photo may be blurred. Very useful. Good thinking Nikon!
It has a pretty quick reaction on the shutter, especially for the cheapest camera (of a brand that is) you can get.
Too bad: the lens is a real let down. Too much chromatic abberations in the corners, soft lens altogether.
Colours are far too saturated in bright light
Resolution is quite a bit worse than for example Canon A60 (which is now so cheap that it is a much better choice)
Problems:
In the end not good enough: Too low a resolution (2 Mp can do better), very likely to a very poor lens. I have seen better with Olympus or Canon
Good: The blur warning. Tells you that a photo may be blurred. Very useful. Good thinking Nikon!
It has a pretty quick reaction on the shutter, especially for the cheapest camera (of a brand that is) you can get.
Too bad: the lens is a real let down. Too much chromatic abberations in the corners, soft lens altogether.
Colours are far too saturated in bright light
Resolution is quite a bit worse than for example Canon A60 (which is now so cheap that it is a much better choice)
Problems:
In the end not good enough: Too low a resolution (2 Mp can do better), very likely to a very poor lens. I have seen better with Olympus or Canon