M
maney gomes
Guest
Very hard to beat at $129USD - no other brands offers anything this good at this price.
Nikon has increased the pixel counts but decrease the quality and features compared to older models.
I owned the 2mp version of this camera, the 2200, and it had much better macro performance and interface was much more user friendly.
Video has not improved, still noise sound due to focusing.
I choose Nikon because their color redention in general.
This camera takes very good pictures of dark skin people like my wife.
The dark colors are not over saturated, proffesional look. Images are very clean and smooth for such a price.
Outdoors pictures on sunny days are fantastics.
Problems:
The first model in this line was the 2100 and all complaints still remains, nothing has improved except they added more pixel counts.
Noisy videos due to autofocusing.
hurrible low light performance, lots of blurry pictures.
Battery life has become worse, 2200 was much better.
Hurrible Macro performance, embarancement for Nikon.
More scenes have been added which has made the menu much more hard to use, too much scrolling to get what y ou want. I preferred the limited scenes on the 2200 and the quicker access.
Very slow flash recharge, but very good flash color.
Very slow performance so don't be impatient...
If fast performance is required, set it to landscape mode.
If low light shooting, then limit yourself to Museum mode.
The screen has gotten worse then the earlier models.
2200 had a sharp 1.8in screen that was very good.
L11, has a 2.4in screen that is the worst, very bad.
The camera has its issues, but there are work arounds...
For the money, if set correctly, this camera will beat the competion on image quality.
Canon gives you more manual features, but image qualiy is not as great at this price.
Nikon has increased the pixel counts but decrease the quality and features compared to older models.
I owned the 2mp version of this camera, the 2200, and it had much better macro performance and interface was much more user friendly.
Video has not improved, still noise sound due to focusing.
I choose Nikon because their color redention in general.
This camera takes very good pictures of dark skin people like my wife.
The dark colors are not over saturated, proffesional look. Images are very clean and smooth for such a price.
Outdoors pictures on sunny days are fantastics.
Problems:
The first model in this line was the 2100 and all complaints still remains, nothing has improved except they added more pixel counts.
Noisy videos due to autofocusing.
hurrible low light performance, lots of blurry pictures.
Battery life has become worse, 2200 was much better.
Hurrible Macro performance, embarancement for Nikon.
More scenes have been added which has made the menu much more hard to use, too much scrolling to get what y ou want. I preferred the limited scenes on the 2200 and the quicker access.
Very slow flash recharge, but very good flash color.
Very slow performance so don't be impatient...
If fast performance is required, set it to landscape mode.
If low light shooting, then limit yourself to Museum mode.
The screen has gotten worse then the earlier models.
2200 had a sharp 1.8in screen that was very good.
L11, has a 2.4in screen that is the worst, very bad.
The camera has its issues, but there are work arounds...
For the money, if set correctly, this camera will beat the competion on image quality.
Canon gives you more manual features, but image qualiy is not as great at this price.