lichtloper
Member
I am selling my E-620 with its 'croocked' Viewfinder image and bought an E-520.
For me the only advantage of 620 over 520 is that the viewfinder information is shown below the frame.
I do not see much difference in the quality of the RAWfiles.
There are two reasons why I did / do not leave the Olympus clan:
+ the excellent quality of the 14-54mmII lens
+ the three-by-four image ratio
I get good prints in A3 size;
nor do I do need to publish my photos in glossy magazines;
so for me the FourThirds sensor is large enough.
BTW The ImageStabilization button is rather useless; I can do without it.
For me the only advantage of 620 over 520 is that the viewfinder information is shown below the frame.
I do not see much difference in the quality of the RAWfiles.
There are two reasons why I did / do not leave the Olympus clan:
+ the excellent quality of the 14-54mmII lens
+ the three-by-four image ratio
I get good prints in A3 size;
nor do I do need to publish my photos in glossy magazines;
so for me the FourThirds sensor is large enough.
BTW The ImageStabilization button is rather useless; I can do without it.