BrianKraft
Well-known member
- Messages
- 224
- Solutions
- 1
- Reaction score
- 135
-
Welcome to the new forums! Please read this first. For known issues we are working to resolve, click here.
X100S - Full Wedding
- Thread starter BrianKraft
- Start date
-
- Tags
- fujifilm x100s
Looks like X100s is up to the task. I would be happy with those photos for my own wedding. Well done and thanks for sharing.
cali4nia love
Well-known member
- Messages
- 112
- Reaction score
- 2
What flash did you use (if you used flash at all) to shoot this wedding? I'm debating whether to pair my X100 with EF-20 or EF-42.
muratime
Well-known member
very artistic compositions you made there (excluding that slipper one; I think you shall remove that one 
congratulations..
x100s gave very natural images.. feels like old film cameras like leica..
may I asked you which color adjustment you use.. are they camera edited or PC edited?
I think they are low in color saturation? and also contrast? from camera?
congratulations..
x100s gave very natural images.. feels like old film cameras like leica..
may I asked you which color adjustment you use.. are they camera edited or PC edited?
I think they are low in color saturation? and also contrast? from camera?
Daniel from Bavaria
Leading Member
Hi Brian,
no question, thats a great piece of work. Thanks for sharing these outstanding pictures.
Regards,
Daniel
no question, thats a great piece of work. Thanks for sharing these outstanding pictures.
Regards,
Daniel
Last edited:
I was just thinking the same thing to myself when looking at Brian's site. If he didn't tell us that it was shot with the X-100S, I would have never guessed that it wasn't done with a high end DSLR.
Further proof that it's more about the archer than the arrow, and that the Fuji X System is up to the task of pro level work! Great job Brian and thanks for sharing.
photo perzon
Senior Member
How come the noses are not big with the wide lens?
How come they look normal?
How come they look normal?
theranman
Senior Member
He only shoots portraits of people with very narrow noses.
The optical delusion makes them appear normal in post production.
The optical delusion makes them appear normal in post production.
Last edited:
ArtByLukeBennett
Well-known member
Great photos, you clearly have lots of skill as a photographer and a good eye - they're all interesting shots, well composed, etc. I just really don't like the PP you employ, sorry :S. To me they look like they've been printed off and left in a shirt pocket where someone has chucked said shirt into the washing machine without checking the pocket first.
I'm really of the opinion that obvious PP, while it may be quite 'in' at the time, within a few years or more will almost definitely be 'out' again. Like a haircut from the eighties. It seemed like a good idea back then, but looking at it now... Eek.
Whereas a good natural looking picture will remain good and natural looking for the rest of its life.
I'm really of the opinion that obvious PP, while it may be quite 'in' at the time, within a few years or more will almost definitely be 'out' again. Like a haircut from the eighties. It seemed like a good idea back then, but looking at it now... Eek.
Whereas a good natural looking picture will remain good and natural looking for the rest of its life.
chris24net
Forum Enthusiast
Fantastic images.
What film simulation did you use for pictures in color?Camp
New member
HDR? I'm curious what you saw that made you think any of these were HDR processed?
Thank you for this amazing series. It's obvious the camera was in talented hands but it was remarkable that those talented hands have proved once more what could be done with one camera and one lens.. Sometimes less is more; not any different than what some of those we admire as being the masters of photography used to tell us decades long...
Mehran Khalili
Active member
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 17
Bloody hell. Great job. You really understood the limits of the camera and how to squeeze real results out of it. Thanks for sharing.
Did you use the WCL-X100 converter with any of these, or all 'naked' X100S?
nice but a camera system with a zoom or multiple primes will give you better results, there seems to be so many missing photos too.
why limit yourself ?
NumberOne
Senior Member
Not bashing the X100S, but the many amazing pictures - IMO - reflect more the photographer's excellence/skills than the system's quality/usability for this kind of work...
Best regards,
Pedro
FANTASTIC shots, Brian. Like others here, I'd be interested in what software you used to process your RAW files and what setting you used for the cool B&W and color look.
best,
Jake
No HDR detected here either..
I'm referring to the Dynamic Range function on the X-series - which is a form of HDR. I'm curious which setting Brian used (AUTO, 100%, 200% or 400%).
Keyboard shortcuts
- f
- Forum