5D3 is 2012 Camera of the Year by Popular Photography Mag.

Abdullah M

Well-known member
Messages
116
Solutions
1
Reaction score
21
Location
Dahadh Village, SA
More details in the new issue of the magazine.

"It's the best low-light DSLR we have yet tested. A near-perfect tool for the still shooter, it can double as a top gun for the videographer. And while it's a new model, it's based on a time-tested workhorse for serious shooters, amateur and pro alike. It's the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, and as the camera “that best refined or redefined photography,” it's our Camera of the Year for 2012."




From page 58, Jan 2013 issue.
 
Abdullah M wrote:

More details in the new issue of the magazine.

"It's the best low-light DSLR we have yet tested. A near-perfect tool for the still shooter, it can double as a top gun for the videographer. And while it's a new model, it's based on a time-tested workhorse for serious shooters, amateur and pro alike. It's the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, and as the camera “that best refined or redefined photography,” it's our Camera of the Year for 2012."

From page 58, Jan 2013 issue.
apparently they don't use dxomark .. :)
 
Well done. :D
 
Pop Photo lost all credibility years ago for serious shooters. I stopped reading the rag after Herb Keppler passed away several years ago. He was the last thing worth reading.

While the 5D3 is a great camera, I can't think of a single thing about it that "redefines photography" in any way.
 
gipper51 wrote:

Pop Photo lost all credibility years ago for serious shooters. I stopped reading the rag after Herb Keppler passed away several years ago. He was the last thing worth reading.

While the 5D3 is a great camera, I can't think of a single thing about it that "redefines photography" in any way.
I ditched my subscription to Pop Photo as well, I find that magazine to be a joke. Nobody I'm aware of considers them a credible source whatsoever.

I'm not knocking the 5DM3, but I personally would take anything Pop Photo says with a grain of salt. They often publish things that directly defy pretty well every other credible source (in general, not necessarily specific to the 5DM3). There are much better places to get your information.
 
Last edited:
gipper51 wrote:

Pop Photo lost all credibility years ago for serious shooters. I stopped reading the rag after Herb Keppler passed away several years ago. He was the last thing worth reading.

While the 5D3 is a great camera, I can't think of a single thing about it that "redefines photography" in any way.
 
gipper51 wrote:

Pop Photo lost all credibility years ago for serious shooters. I stopped reading the rag after Herb Keppler passed away several years ago. He was the last thing worth reading.

While the 5D3 is a great camera, I can't think of a single thing about it that "redefines photography" in any way.
 
Last edited:
Abdullah M wrote:

More details in the new issue of the magazine.

"It's the best low-light DSLR we have yet tested. A near-perfect tool for the still shooter, it can double as a top gun for the videographer. And while it's a new model, it's based on a time-tested workhorse for serious shooters, amateur and pro alike. It's the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, and as the camera “that best refined or redefined photography,” it's our Camera of the Year for 2012."

From page 58, Jan 2013 issue.
What about Nikon's D800, it's got the highest DR, mp, and ionotted by DXO to be king. What happened? How could a 10 years old sensor BEAT the latest greatest sensor from Sony? How can a sensor with a massive banding problem BEAT the almighty Sony. What happened jjnik, sterass, rustbarnes and noscreenameguy? Pros at Reuter shoots Canon, now camera of the year crown...........What about accolades for the Backyard Mechanics at DPR who shoots D800.
 
rrccad wrote:
Abdullah M wrote:

More details in the new issue of the magazine.

"It's the best low-light DSLR we have yet tested. A near-perfect tool for the still shooter, it can double as a top gun for the videographer. And while it's a new model, it's based on a time-tested workhorse for serious shooters, amateur and pro alike. It's the Canon EOS 5D Mark III, and as the camera “that best refined or redefined photography,” it's our Camera of the Year for 2012."

From page 58, Jan 2013 issue.
apparently they don't use dxomark .. :)
Taking real-world photos not playing game of X-stop extreame shadow pulling :-)
 
I rather DXO stand behind a camera than Pop Photo. Former has big time credibility issue.

Same about backyard mechanics vs. Viva.:-)
 
caspianm wrote:

I rather DXO stand behind a camera than Pop Photo. Former has big time credibility issue.

Same about backyard mechanics vs. Viva.:-)
viva shoots a rebel and lives w parents
 
Last edited:
caspianm wrote:

I rather DXO stand behind a camera than Pop Photo. Former has big time credibility issue.

Same about backyard mechanics vs. Viva.:-)
So you rather be with DXO + Backyard Mechanics team THAN the pros at Reuters + Pop Mag that has a more holistic(AF, LV, feature sets, burst depth....etc.) approach and understanding in selecting a camera.
 
caspianm wrote:

I rather DXO stand behind a camera than Pop Photo. Former has big time credibility issue.

Same about backyard mechanics vs. Viva.:-)
really? so do you only print / view at 8x12 print size because that's how DxOMark scores them.

Not only that, there is very little in the way of information to know whether or not DxO's RAW analysis takes into account the black offset pixels for both row and column that is contained in the CR2 file, which could have an effect on results.
 
Last edited:
Shaun_Nyc wrote:
caspianm wrote:

I rather DXO stand behind a camera than Pop Photo. Former has big time credibility issue.

Same about backyard mechanics vs. Viva.:-)
viva shoots a rebel and lives w parents
Hey Shaun New York City long time no keystroke man, I thought you already knew, my camera is in the cellphone........it is NOT even a smartphone, it's one of those 2003 cellphones WITH a camera inside. Oh and I live with my Great Grand parents because my parents kicked me out for using their laptops at night blogging at DPreview. :-(
 
Last edited:
AllOtherNamesTaken wrote:
gipper51 wrote:

Pop Photo lost all credibility years ago for serious shooters. I stopped reading the rag after Herb Keppler passed away several years ago. He was the last thing worth reading.

While the 5D3 is a great camera, I can't think of a single thing about it that "redefines photography" in any way.
I ditched my subscription to Pop Photo as well, I find that magazine to be a joke. Nobody I'm aware of considers them a credible source whatsoever.

I'm not knocking the 5DM3, but I personally would take anything Pop Photo says with a grain of salt. They often publish things that directly defy pretty well every other credible source (in general, not necessarily specific to the 5DM3). There are much better places to get your information.
I hope I'm still in his IGNORE LIST, at any rate, he ditched it because his D800 did not win........aha ha haha!
 
I am sorry for that, I was think that Pop Photo is among the best in gear tests.
 
I hope I'm still in his IGNORE LIST, hey guys, WHY in the hell would name yourself AllOtherNamesTaken? Why not MyNameMittWasTaken?
 
I hesitate to post anything here because I fear the usual slings and arrows of outrage from those who don't agree with me, but here is my opinion in a nutshell as a 5D3 owner: the 5D3 is the best overall digital camera for professional use I've ever owned, and I've owned an awful lot of them, some costing many, many times more.

It doesn't produce the biggest files of any camera I've owned, but the files are big enough for 95% of anything I'd ever likely need to do , and there's always stitching or a digital back rental for the others.

It doesn't produce the least noisy files of any camera on earth at high ISO's, but the real world images at 1600 and 3200 are so good that I feel comfortable commonly using them in my work for the first time.

Its files don't have the now famous capability of raising shadow values by truly unusual, maybe ridiculous, amounts that some others seem to have, but I find it will allow at least a couple of stops just fine, which is a little more than I've ever actually needed, because I tend to make smaller mistakes - or bracket like hell in very critical situations - than those which would make that shadow lifting an advantage.

It isn't the most rugged or most weatherproof or have the longest rated shutter of all cameras I've owned, but in all those cases, it is easily good enough for my professional needs. In fact, just a few days ago I shot in a steady but very light rain, with temperatures just above freezing, for a couple of hours - the worst conditions to which I would expose any camera of mine - and the camera suffered absolutely no ill effects.

It idoesn't have the very best ergonomics of any camera I've owned, but it is within a whisker of being so in that regard.

It isn't the fastest operating camera I've owned, but it is easily fast enough for whatever I actually do, including occasional action shooting.

It has the most accurate, responsive and fast focusing of any camera I've owned so far, and it costs half of what any faster focusing one (1Dx) would.

It has the best menu system and smoothest (and maybe quietest) shutter action of any DSLR camera I've owned.

It isn't the cheapest DSLR I could conceivably use, but it is still very moderately priced compared to its more strictly "professional" cousins like the 1Dx and Nikon D4.

It came with very good software for free, including a very decent raw converter that, if you don't want to invest in a 3rd party program, can serve you well for even professional use.

In other words, when you consider the whole package, it seems to do the real job of shooting professional level still pictures very, very well with almost no noticeable vices and many, many advantages. That makes this camera very desireable for those who aren't looking for one or two particular outstanding capabilities, but want something that does just about everything very, very well, and sometimes better than that, with no fuss whatsoever. Add its very good video capabilities to this package, and you have a camera that most advanced amateurs and professionals can easily learn to love.

At the risk of sounding too enamored of the 5D3, I think I would agree with Pop Photo's assessment, regardless of what you may or may not think of their credentials or bias in coming to their conclusion.

Regards,

David
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top