jhinkey
Senior Member
Us landscape guys point our cameras+lenses at the sun all the time . . . .:-D
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Although I agree with most of what you say, I'd like to point out that the tendency for certain types of flare to go purple on the E-M5, and therefore become visible although they would otherwise have passed more or less unoticed, is there with any lens, including the Oly 45/1.8. It's more a camera problem than a lens problem. How much flare of the problematic kind you actually get will vary from one lens to another but the problem is not limited to certain lenses. Here's a comparison of the Oly 45/1.8 on the E-M5 versus the G1:Steve_ wrote:
'Is it still worth it?' for OMD owners is a valid question. These days we are spoiled by extraordinary performance with regard to flare and ghosts, with lenses like the Oly 45 being astounding good in the very face of the sun. But primes have a big advantage here, and zooms, especially those with large and enough elements to start at 12/2.8 on m43, do have less a resistance inherently. You are back to the 60's with the 12-35 on the OMD, ghost and flare-wise. If you work around it the lens is optical dynamite: