Canon 6D samples are out, what is your opinion compared to the 5D mark III?

[George Fotiadis]

Particular about high ISO.

 

[Eric Turcotte]

George Fotiadis wrote:

Particular about high ISO.

My 5D classic don't have this kind of "no details".

I guess the new digic5 do this mess with jpg. This good when we don't see at 100% pixel pitch.

I just hope in RAW the digic 5 don't do this process as much

 

[AllOtherNamesTaken]

The only thing you can get from the shots is what the 6D JPEG engine is like. Need to wait for the full RAW comparisons to make any judgments whatsoever vs the 5DM3. There was evidence that the 5DM3 cooks even the RAW files so I will be curious to see if the 6D is the same or not.

 

[George Fotiadis]

Yep, right it is early yet

 

[schmegg]

AllOtherNamesTaken wrote:

The only thing you can get from the shots is what the 6D JPEG engine is like. Need to wait for the full RAW comparisons to make any judgments whatsoever vs the 5DM3. There was evidence that the 5DM3 cooks even the RAW files so I will be curious to see if the 6D is the same or not.

Perhaps you could explain to us how this might affect ones photography in a meaningful and detrimental way. LOL!

 

[jgardia]

They cook the raw files only in the "extended iso" range. There is no evidence of cooking in the normal range (100-25600).