peter42y
Senior Member
Viewfinder would have made camera bulkier , in other words , it would defeat the purpose of the camera which is to be as small as possible.I'm really happy they didn't try to cram a nearly useless and make-things-bulkier viewfinder into a camera that clearly doesn't need one.No viewfinder. That sucks.
If you want a viewfinder - there's a bazillion larger cameras you can choose from.
Canon G1X has a viewfinder , some might argue.
Ok. But its a pretty small one and many claim it is useless.
Maybe the sony could have a hotshoe to attach viewfinder has the GF1 has.
That would make more sense but even in that case camera maybe would have been bulkier which would be disadvantage.
The much acclaimed Canon S95.., S100 have no viewfinder , either.