jimr
Forum Pro
Links please...
Not looking for Amazon etc..user comments/evaluations...but rather full professional reviews/tests...
Not looking for Amazon etc..user comments/evaluations...but rather full professional reviews/tests...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I understand your frustration Jim.Lost opportunity happening. I was hanging out for a review of the SZ-31 MR but in the meantime I saw some samples from the Nikon P510 and grabbed one of them due to what my eyes saw, wow! If Olympus had released their's a tad sooner I may have had the pocketable zoom I was looking for rather than the excellent but bulkier Nikon.
Nothing outzooms the P510, it can do do digital zoom too, not that I bother, an afterwards crop achieves that.Then there's the doubling of the zoom which pushes it to x48 making it slightly longer than the Nikon's x42.
I love Olympus JPGs and nearly bought a XZ-1 a while back except I was able to pick up an E-PL1 even cheaper. I even ordered a TG-610 the other day as I wanted a rugged camera and Olympus do tend to have a JPG look I like, but that Nikon P510 is something special, only limited by its lack of portability, something many SLR users are reluctant to gnash their teeth about. Perhaps I may end up gnashing my few remaining ones when the SZ-31 is tested, who knows?It's things such as these (and more) which again is making me hold out and go for the SZ-31.
Mike
--
Happy with most Cameras but use:-
Nikon D200 + various differing Lens [inc Sigma Bigma].
Fuji X10
Olympus XZ-1
Panasonic LX3
Other favs of recent use:
Various Nikon DSLR's,
Canon SX95
Panasonic TZ5, TZ7, TZ10
...and a bucket load of others!
I understand your frustration Jim.Lost opportunity happening. I was hanging out for a review of the SZ-31 MR but in the meantime I saw some samples from the Nikon P510 and grabbed one of them due to what my eyes saw, wow! If Olympus had released their's a tad sooner I may have had the pocketable zoom I was looking for rather than the excellent but bulkier Nikon.
I personally though am holding out for the SZ-31
As you say it is much smaller:-
Nikon P510 = 119.8 x 82.9 x 102.2 mm (4.8 x 3.3 x 4.1 in.) (excluding projections)
Olympus SZ-31 = 106 x 69 x 40 mm (4.2 x 2.7 x 1.6 in)
Then there's the sensor's BSI technology which supposedly gathers more light than a standard unit.
Next we have the backside illuminated CMOS sensor and true mechanical image stabilization which we are told will reduce blur from camera shake (done by 'jiggling' the sensor to counteract against your movements).
Then there's the doubling of the zoom which pushes it to x48 making it slightly longer than the Nikon's x42.
But I like some of the other tricks the SZ-31 performs such as the twin TruePic V processors which allows you to either take two different videos or a video and a shot.
Or the Touch-sensitive, 3.0-inch 920,000-dot LCD screen.
Simply touch the screen to either Focus & Picture Automatically is taken, or when touched AF is Locked, you then have to press the shutter to take the shot.
The Backlit HDR adjustment will be interesting if it works.
Finally there's the Hand-Held Starlight mode which enables you to shoot blur-free beautiful night scenes while holding the camera in your hands without using a tripod.
It's things such as these (and more) which again is making me hold out and go for the SZ-31.
Mike
--
Happy with most Cameras but use:-
Nikon D200 + various differing Lens [inc Sigma Bigma].
Fuji X10
Olympus XZ-1
Panasonic LX3
Other favs of recent use:
Various Nikon DSLR's,
Canon SX95
Panasonic TZ5, TZ7, TZ10
...and a bucket load of others!
I don't see it as in competition with them, for some odd reason I have it pegged in a class of its own, pocketable but you'd want to be sure you're going to use it if you carry it. An almost odd size that still has a mystique and charm that may appeal, it certainly had me looking/interested, perhaps I still am.The major question now how does its actual IQ and performance compare to the already tested small Panasonic ZS 15, ZS 20 and Canon SX 260.
Very formidable, and I do need to add a Canon to my collection sometime.These are all formidable competition to the untested Oly......
I don't see it as in competition with them, for some odd reason I have it pegged in a class of its own, pocketable but you'd want to be sure you're going to use it if you carry it. An almost odd size that still has a mystique and charm that may appeal, it certainly had me looking/interested, perhaps I still am.The major question now how does its actual IQ and performance compare to the already tested small Panasonic ZS 15, ZS 20 and Canon SX 260.
Very formidable, and I do need to add a Canon to my collection sometime.These are all formidable competition to the untested Oly......
Keep in mind what you actually will do with your chosen purchase. The first picture that a buyer of a high-end DSLR usually takes is of his or her dog.An IQ comparison with the others mentioned would surely be helpful ...
Charm is lovely....Performance and IQ are crucial to choosing...
We won once, and brought it here. But our suits (financial backers) got into the act and stuffed the design of our boat.Henry, your racing yacht picture is excellent. But it brings tears to my eyes -- we lost the America's Cup to you guys, back when! Darn!
Yes Jon, that was me....Somebody above said the SZ-31 had a touch screen with focus lock, which might be very useful. We'll see.
At this stage I'm none to bothered with the fact it's as you say a full stop slower than the SZ-10. I feel pretty confident that new chip and iHS will be more than enough to compensate.That Focus Lock could be VERY convenient... like for sports action where you could lock on a spot that you know ahead of time will be exciting.
Here's my gripe -- why on earth did Olympus announce this camera on February 8th, and now it's April 23rd and they're still not in the stores! (Best Buy, Staples, Amazon). Great cameras, inept marketing.
Also hope the SZ-31's battery-compartment door has a better latch than the one on my SZ-10, which pops open from time to time. Another downside -- the SZ-31's zoom, at full tele, is about a stop slower than the SZ-10's. But hopefully the new chip will make up for that somehow, with the backlighting.
Found the SZ-31 manual at: http://resources.olympus-europa.com/imaging/Manuals/SS2012/SZ-31MR_MANUAL_EN.pdf ... now all we need is the camera!
At the radio club in ambient phosphorescent lightingAlso hope the SZ-31's battery-compartment door has a better latch than the one on my SZ-10, which pops open from time to time. Another downside -- the SZ-31's zoom, at full tele, is about a stop slower than the SZ-10's. But hopefully the new chip will make up for that somehow, with the backlighting.