you think you're getting soaked because you're paying an extra $150
for software on your $2000 camera? just think of all us lucky
folks that have been here since the original D1 days, $500 for NC1
after buying a $5000 camera! :-0
like raven said, it's either charge everyone $2150 and include
software a lot of people are never going to use or part out the
sale a bit so you only have to buy what you want/need.
Peter D.
KHous wrote:
This has been debated many times before, but the bottom line is
this. The D100 is already priced $200 below the nearest
competition (Canon D60 @ $2200). Therefore, all Nikon is really
doing is selling their software seperately instead of making you
pay for it when you buy. Either way, the software is not free,
it's just a matter of whether you pay for it with the camera or by
itself. Same thing goes for the AC adapter.
If Nikon did package the software with the camera they would of
course charge more (software development is not free or even cheap)
and then many people would complain that they have to pay for this
"useless software." Just ask all the people that already own a
D100 and have no clue about how to process NEF's.
Nikon actually does give you the tools you need to do basic NEF
processing for free (Nikon View / PS Plugin). They just don't give
you the full on do it all software that is NC3.
Personally, I feel that this is an ideal arrangment since you only
have to pay for what you need, and if you need it all your not
paying any more than the competition. The only thing Nikon could
do to make more people happy would be to have a "with NC3/AC
apdapter" and "without" version of the D100 package to make
everbody feel like they are not getting ripped off.
--
Ràvén