I've had the X10 for a couple of weeks now, and I'm hard pressed to logically state why I should keep it.
I already have a DSLR and bag full of lenses as my primary kit, which is staying. And a Canon SX230 that I really like for pocketability, 14X zoom, and slo-mo video (my 6 year old loves it). It's staying.
Given that, how can I justify a $600 point and shoot? It is very capable in the IQ department (arguably the best P&S out there, and certainly the best I've used - vs S90, G11, TL500). I'm a big fan of the manual zoom, the direct control options, and the styling.
If it were to be my only camera it would be a no brainer, but given that I will keep my DSLR and always default to it when IQ is really important I'm not sure what role the X10 fills? A less pocketable camera than the SX230 that will give me somewhat better snapshots for times that are not DSLR-worthy? Doesn't seem like nearly enough for $600.
I've had a couple of micro4/3s kits, which I really liked. But I've moved away from them for the same reason, that they don't really fill a huge need and can't replace my DSLR.
But here's the thing with the X10. It has put a spell on me. It makes me pick it up and shoot with it. Not only am I going to keep it, but I am going to spend more money on it for accessories (because I want to give it gifts).
Obviously I am exaggerating a bit here. But not much. The X10 is really a joy for me to shoot. It's what a camera should be. There is no struggle when using it. I can't get rid of it, even if it doesn't seem to fill a large need. Why is it worth $600? Because with it I will shoot more. That's sort of priceless, I think, or at least that's my rationalization.
I already have a DSLR and bag full of lenses as my primary kit, which is staying. And a Canon SX230 that I really like for pocketability, 14X zoom, and slo-mo video (my 6 year old loves it). It's staying.
Given that, how can I justify a $600 point and shoot? It is very capable in the IQ department (arguably the best P&S out there, and certainly the best I've used - vs S90, G11, TL500). I'm a big fan of the manual zoom, the direct control options, and the styling.
If it were to be my only camera it would be a no brainer, but given that I will keep my DSLR and always default to it when IQ is really important I'm not sure what role the X10 fills? A less pocketable camera than the SX230 that will give me somewhat better snapshots for times that are not DSLR-worthy? Doesn't seem like nearly enough for $600.
I've had a couple of micro4/3s kits, which I really liked. But I've moved away from them for the same reason, that they don't really fill a huge need and can't replace my DSLR.
But here's the thing with the X10. It has put a spell on me. It makes me pick it up and shoot with it. Not only am I going to keep it, but I am going to spend more money on it for accessories (because I want to give it gifts).
Obviously I am exaggerating a bit here. But not much. The X10 is really a joy for me to shoot. It's what a camera should be. There is no struggle when using it. I can't get rid of it, even if it doesn't seem to fill a large need. Why is it worth $600? Because with it I will shoot more. That's sort of priceless, I think, or at least that's my rationalization.