So it's FF for me now

[pluton]

--and this post is about
Mironv
http://mironv.smugmug.com/

Ditto...
--
-KB-

 

[flashpixx]

--and this post is about
Mironv
http://mironv.smugmug.com/

right back at you Sir
--
Gordon

2 x D300 + MB-D10, AF-S VR Nikkor 200-400 f/4G IF, AF-S 70-200 f2.8 VR1, AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55 f2.8 G IF- ED, TC-14EII, AF-S 35 f1.8 G. SB 700
http://www.flashpixx.net

 

[apaflo]

Couple that w/ the knowledge of how much a D2 is now worth, w/ the fact that it was once worth over $5,200...

Just look at the receipt, that usually does it for me

I just relate it all to the fact that I used to buy film in 100' rolls, and today the cost of processing film would be about 50 cents a shot. Every 10,000 clicks I can afford a brand new top of the line DSLR!

 

[Robert Daniels]

F*CK MironV. my friend already handed his @ss to him a while back ...Go back to your hole mironv. LMAO!
--

• 'What's the use of having BIG hands if you have short fingers'

Nikon forever... Babe!

 

[260684]

But did you really need 1/4000 second for taking that shot?

I mean, going down to 1/2000 and you would have been able to go down one stop in iso as well giving an even cleaner shot.

--
Rickard Hansson
Sweden

Agree, also the shot doesn't actually work. The football is totally cut off. Our eyes are led down the footballer to nothing. Sorry! YMMV.

 

[georgelien]

You're going to love it (Assuming the body doesn't come with any problem)!

 

[PerL]

But did you really need 1/4000 second for taking that shot?

I mean, going down to 1/2000 and you would have been able to go down one stop in iso as well giving an even cleaner shot.

It was a test where I cycled through the high ISOs to see the performance. Here is one at ISO 12800...





... and here is one at the "emergency/papparazzi setting" ISO 102 400





Later I made prints, and they looked even better in regard to noise vs how they look on a computer screen.

--
Rickard Hansson
Sweden

--
http://dslr-video.com/blogmag/

 

[PerL]

But did you really need 1/4000 second for taking that shot?

I mean, going down to 1/2000 and you would have been able to go down one stop in iso as well giving an even cleaner shot.

--
Rickard Hansson
Sweden

Agree, also the shot doesn't actually work. The football is totally cut off. Our eyes are led down the footballer to nothing. Sorry! YMMV.

I am well aware of that - it was the low level of noise at extreme ISOs I wanted to show. Here is another high ISO (dont remeber if it was ISO 16000 or 25600) with the whole ball.





--
http://dslr-video.com/blogmag/