I had the decency to try to look up the information that the OP requested via the owners manual. I took the time to do just that. I posted FACTUAL INFORMATION as taken directly from the owners manual. I even posted a copy of the page for you. But you just HAVE to continue with your typical discrediting mannerisms. So typical of you.
Yes, you took factual information, but then failed to accurately or correctly state what it showed.
Absolutely NOTHING I stated was incorrect. It was YOU who attempted to interject words that I simply never stated, or even suggested . That is what you do best, in continually trying to discredit people here in these forums. Your sickness is just that, a sickness that needs Professional help. I am not qualified to help in that regards, sorry.
Most other forum members that read your rants have a different opinion of who needs help, but what you stated is as wrong now as it was when you wrote it. A composite number displayed on the camera's LCD that shows part of a directory name and part of a filename is
not a real object that anyone can find on the memory card. The partial image of the page that you eventually posted makes very clear what these two numbers are, but it's of almost no help in telling the camera owner how to create new folders, how to rename them in different ways to control the different ways that they can be viewed (or not viewed). What I wrote provided a lot more information about the inner workings of the camera's folder and filename conventions and how to modify them to do things that the camera doesn't necessarily allow.
What I am qualified to do is to offer up HELP to the members here, and I even went so far as to admitting in my first post, that I had no idea how to change the Directory numbers. You see Billx08, I am an HONEST person who does not feel the need to say something that is NOT true. I am also well versed at computer technology and information, so please don't try to use childish insults about elementary knowledge of the differences between Directories and Folders. Is it unbecoming of any rational human being to resort to silly insults which you continually do.
You're doing an excellent job of making yourself look childish and foolish so there's no need for me to even consider insulting you. In fact, even here you've got it backwards. I never said that there's any difference at all between a directory and a folder. I was trying to make clear that these are the same, but not the same as what Fuji calls a "Directory number". If you weren't so angry, driven by your vendetta (one of
many that you have, and that you've publicly admitted to) you'd have been able to understand my points. Had anyone other than you written the same reply, I would have answered it in much the same manner. Everything isn't really about
you , even if that's the way you see it.
Now, I should have done this quite some time ago. I am placing you into my IGNORE list for the rest of your posting career here at Dpreview. I will notify the moderators of my decision to do just that. I will NEVER respond to you again, (of which I am sure you will be thankful, and frankly, I should have done that a few months ago).
I agree, that's a good move that you should have made a long time ago. But I'm under no illusion that you won't break this vow since you've broken similar vows before. But at least it's a good start.
If you continue to STALK ME around the forums like you do Daniel Lowe and a few others, you will be reported until you are gone. Trust me, I am strong enough to IGNORE YOU, it will now be up to you to see if you are strong enough. I suggest you learn.
That "stalking" charge is silly and simply untrue. Can you show where I've followed you to different forums? All I know is that others have said that you posted frequently in what used to be the Retouching forum, one of the forums that I don't read or post to. I followed only what appeared to be a new thread in
this forum, the one that I most often reply in, from someone that needed help, and since you rarely post in this forum, never expected to see a reply from you in this thread. If your reply to the OP was completely correct there would have been no reason to add mine. If your reply had simply omitted some other useful piece of information, I would probably have mentioned that in a reply to the OP, not in a reply to you. But I saw that your answer was not only wrong in part, it also left out much that could have provided a solution. Bigger men are able to accept that.
Good bye Bill. Have a great life.
P.S. I will indeed continue to report ALL of your rule violations, as I have done at least three times today with Daniel Lowe.
I suspect that the moderators don't jump for joy every time they see yet another incoming diatribe from Conrad Birdie. I think that they'd really appreciate it if you'd make a similar vow to them.