African Safari

donmcvee

Active member
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Location
Kelowna, BC, CA
I am planning on attending a ten day African Photo-safari in Tanzania. I have read dozens of suggestions as to what equipment to take but none of them address my concerns. I want to avoid frequent lens changes because of the dust problem. I also want to avoid taking equipment I wont use. I have kind of settled on a D700 with 24-120 f4 and a D7000 with 80-400 lens. I will also take my TC14 and appropriate filters. I'm not sure about tripod and/or monopod. Anyone with experience on safaris have any advice?
Cheers, Don
--
It's all about light.
 
Caveat - I've not been on safari, just read a lot about them.

I'd read this first:
http://www.bythom.com/botswanaworkshop2.htm

scroll down to the part that starts:

"So perhaps it's a good time to write about the difference between safaris in different areas of Africa. I'm going to describe six different areas that are target rich for wildlife shooters:"

It makes sense to me. If you are in a park that can't go off road, you tend to need longer lenses as you may not be right next to an animal. If you are in a vehicle that crams a lot of people together, neither beanbag nor long lens may be useable. If you are in open top vehicles, support equipment should be different that closed-top vehicles. So the answer for you will probably be 'it depends'. Depends on where you go and with what company.
 
I have been to Tanzania last fall and will be going again this year.

Typically you'll find Toyota Land Cruisers are the safari vehicle of choice in Tanzania. And they are usually set up with six seats, each one has a window that opens and the roof is a pop up variety. Leave the tripod and or monopod at home, take a bean bag, I recommend the Kinesis Safari Sack, fill it up once you arrive or have your guide get you some rice or beans before you arrive, you'll need about 4.5 Kg.

The Kinesis bag is great because it has a strap that you can buckle around the rail on the pop up keeping it in place as you drive. If you are unfamiliar with this type of vehicle I suggest you view this video by Andy Biggs, maker of the best camera back pack, the Kiboko, http://andybiggs.squarespace.com/the-global-photographer/category/techniques

Dust isn't as much of an issue as some would think. Judicious lens changing can minimize dust entering the mirror box, ie, don't change lenses when dust enters the vehicle, what until it clears and always point the body in a lens down position. Also, take a sensor cleaning kit or if you feel uneasy doing this, expect to clone out the dust in post.
--
35 to 4 x 5 - NPS Member
 
JBP has pretty well covered it. I've been on several safaris in Kenya where the wise (or forewarned), person chooses a company that uses big Toyota 4WD or very similar. I choose my vehicle and driver and travel with max 4 passengers. If you are going on a package tour basis then you may find yourself in a minibus type of 2 wheel drive. Unfortunately, these vehicles - although smaller - cram in seven to nine persons with only 4 viewing ports, so photography can be difficult I imagine.

I'm not saying you won't find a use for a tripod or monopod when in camp/lodge but you won't need them in Kenya or Tanzania while actually on safari because roofed vehicles are the rule there (with large cockpits for viewing/photography).

I'm not sure about the size and weight of beanbag suggested by JBP though - any weight below the camera and to the side is not going to help steady it, is it? Likewise the size - anything out to the side of the resting point is not supporting the lens. I use a small, cheap bag, filled fairly tightly with polystyrene balls - it weighs less than a half kilo. I keep the tripod foot fitted to my Bigma to rest on the beanbag while allowing me space to zoom and turn the setup easily. Tie your bean bag to the vehicle.

Your camera/lens setup is as near perfect as you'll get. Your D700+24-120 and D7000+80-400 is virtually the equivalent of my D700+28-300 and D300+50-500, when the extra "cropability" of the D7000 is taken into account.

Take the TC14 because you may get the chance to shoot birds or wildlife whilst in camp/lodge but otherwise you won't need it much on safari - but - there was one occasion when I was following lions hunting and I had to crop severely to capture the end of the (unsuccessful) hunt.

Don't forget to include enough landscape environment in your animal pictures or you'll end up with pictures that could be taken in a zoo - in fact, take landscape pictures if you're near Killimanjaro or Mt Kenya and the acacia and boabab trees.

Don't forget to put your camera down sometimes or you'll arrive home and realise you saw Africa only through a lens. :)
Have a great time.
 
I wasn't suggesting that weight would help steady the camera, I was suggesting the amount of rice necessary to fill the Kinesis Safari Sack to the right capacity. Too little and the bag wouldn't be effective, too much and it wouldn't conform to the lens. Take along a couple of large zip-lock bags so any extra can be stowed. No need to tie the Kinesis bag to the vehicle, it has a provided strap for that with a QR buckle. It also comes with two adjustable straps which allow you to change the profile of the apex, thereby making quite flexible.

I took a Leitz mini tripod to shoot when in the camp, you'll want photos of the accommodations.
I'm not sure about the size and weight of beanbag suggested by JBP though - any weight below the camera and to the side is not going to help steady it, is it? Likewise the size - anything out to the side of the resting point is not supporting the lens. I use a small, cheap bag, filled fairly tightly with polystyrene balls - it weighs less than a half kilo. I keep the tripod foot fitted to my Bigma to rest on the beanbag while allowing me space to zoom and turn the setup easily. Tie your bean bag to the vehicle.
--
35 to 4 x 5 - NPS Member
 
Vic,

Thanks for the advice. My plan is to go with Mike Hagan (Nikonians) next spring. He uses 4 wheel drive vehicles with only three photographers per vehicle with one vehicle wide seat each. Glad to hear my gear choice is appropriate. I have used the 24-120 for landscapes and it does a good job.I am basically a landscape photographer looking for new material. I plan to spend as much time looking through my binoculars as my viewfinder.
Don
--
It's all about light.
 
I have been to Africa and believe the equipment you suggest will serve you very well. I would not take a mono/tripod and, it is hard to change lenses on the fly in a safari vehicle so I would not take the converter either, also it will not work well on the long zoom and what is the point on the short zoom. Some of the best shooting is done early and late when light is very poor. I would invest in a flash and a Better Beamer attachment for it. It is the adventure of a lifetime for most of us, so don't stress too much over pictures and enjoy the trip.
--
Chuck Currey
 
The dust!

Penetrates EVERYTHING.

Respect your optics by keeping them under covers when not in use.

Use skill when changing lenses.

Else... have fun... and mind the baboons. They dont respect ANYTHING!

-ger-
 
Check Andy Biggs (The Global Photographer Blog) Andy is truly the Africa Safari expert. Based on my Africa trips having a longer lens 200-400 or 500 VR is necessary. Either one can be rented.
 
I was in Uganda 2 weeks ago on business and managed a quick 2 day trip to Murchison Falls Park. My 200-400 was my most used lens on my D700 and the 70-200 on the D-200 was a distant 2nd and the 24-70 3rd.

Taking same heavy rig to Tanzania tomorrow with the hope of making a weekend trip to the Serengeti and for me worth the hassle of taking a 35 pound backpack.
Check Andy Biggs (The Global Photographer Blog) Andy is truly the Africa Safari expert. Based on my Africa trips having a longer lens 200-400 or 500 VR is necessary. Either one can be rented.
--



http://www.flickr.com/photos/22388579@N08/
 
Agree with all above including checking out Andy Biggs, a very experienced African photographer and all around great guy.

And I was in Tanzania last Feb 2011, for three weeks. Lake Manyara, Ndutu, Serengeti, and Ngorongoro Crater. BUT I'd rather photo safari in Kenya or South Africa. Because of off-road vehicling.. That is, only in Ndutu area are you allowed to go off road. Not in Lake Manyara, nor Serengeti, nor Ngorongoro. Being required to stay on the road very severely limits the vehicle position.. And vehicle position is critical for the best subject view and light conditions. I'm not saying you can't take pictures, and good ones, but you can better ones and many more if your vehicle can go off road.

cary
 
I've read a number of comments about the advantage of being able to go off-road. Is this such an advantage? I would think if everyone is required to stay on designated roads, at least the areas where the animals are would be vehicle free. It seems to me (and remember I have no experience) that having vehicles swanning all over the place would spoil a lot of shots. Any comments?

Also does anyone have experience of renting lenses? I have read a number of negative comments on the 80-400 that I was thinking of buying. That lens would cost me about $1500. To rent a 200-400 f4 for two weeks would cost me $450. Wildlife photography is not really my thing at this point, but I could get hooked. What would you do?
Cheers, and thanks for your help so far,
Don
--
It's all about light.
 
In general, going off road allows you more chances to get close to animals. Being restricted to roads tends to mean you need longer lenses.
--
Craig
http://www.cjcphoto.net
 
That's pretty obvious. But if the horizon is covered with vehicles doing the same thing as you are doing, how do you get pictures with no vehicles in them?
--
It's all about light.
 
Having spent 3 weeks in Tanzania (thanks to the Icelandic ash cloud stopping me from getting home), I can say that you will have no problem getting great shots in NgoroNgoro - it's a vast area, and there are enough animals to give you interesting shots (rather than just the "Oh, look - that's a rhino" ones).

I was just using the 70-200 f2.8 (no extender) on my D3, as well as the 24mm f1.4 (which was fabulous for dawn/dusk shots). However, in many ways the most useful kit was my LX3 - incredibly easy to whip out and capture people/spontaneous shots. I do advise you to take a small pocket camera as well.

(Sorry - no pics, as you can only upload JPGs here.)
 
Since you do not have the 80-400vr you might want to look at the Sig 50-500 OS. It is not just the weight of carrying the gear around but getting it there.

What TC1.4 and for what lens?

Not all shots ( ;) ) will be NatGeo types that one likes to imagine :) . Enjoy Africa and the experience. I dislike a frame full of a lion, Rhino etc that does not have the feel of Africa in the shot.
Cheers,
--
Anticipate the Light and wing it when you get it wrong
Tom
http://taja.smugmug.com/
http://images.nikonians.org/galleries/showgallery.php/ppuser/165169/cat/500
 
I can't speak for SA/Botswana or anywhere that vehicles are allowed off road. My experience is in the large parks of Kenya where only in some small private reserves are you allowed off road - the same applies in most of Tanzania.

From pictures/videos (youtube) I have seen, I prefer the no off road approach because in those pictures/videos from off road vehicles, there so often seems to be other vehicles in the background and quite often one will approach too closely and spook the animals. I never found any vehicles in my shots because all vehicles use the same widely spread tracks so you won't often find another vehicle track within shot.

Leopards are especially shy and easily disturbed. They will move away into cover if approached too closely. Cheetahs are more of a plains animal and it can be difficult to get frame filled shots from a fixed position so a longish lens is important. Rhinos should not be approached closely. Lions take no notice whatsoever and you'll get quite close to those. Where light direction and background are concerned - well you just have to make the best of it with your allowances for backlight and shadow but remember that in Kenya/Tanzania you are on the equator, so within 1 hour of sunrise/sunset you can expect the sun to be high and its direction is pretty much irrelevant as the light bounces around off the light coloured soil.

Any African background is good but the park authorities realise that photographers want the best and in northern Tanzania/south western Kenya you will usually have the opportunity to use Kilimanjaro as your backdrop. Even in those countries that allow off-roading, you will still need the same long lenses for smaller animals and birds.

Only twice in Kenya did I see more than one or two other vehicles at any location and those were special circumstances. The first was a dedicated rhino reserve where rhino had recently been hard to find. As it happens I was using the lodge's mounted telescope from a high up ledge and spotted rhino at a water hole. I went to find our driver and our small party sped off but once we were on our way the driver let others know by radio - that's how it works and it works well and we still got 15 minutes of private viewing before a half-dozen vehicles turned up in line alongside us. The other time was when we were halted by an elephant migration crossing the track and holding up 6 vehicles - several hundred animals, so we weren't complaining.

In Kenya and I believe, in Tanzania, vehicles have to be out of the parks before dark and the African sunset/sunrise is very short so you need to be quick to get those shots.

As an aside and for the information of anyone planning a safari to Kenya - my favourite camp is an eco camp in Tsavo east. I recharge my batteries at every chance and arriving with a fully charged set and several spares proved to be wise as batteries for charging had to be handed over to the management so they could eke out their megre supplies of solar powered electricity, although the c* y Russian panels were soon due to be replaced with a more efficient system. These low impact eco camps are inside the reserves, surrounded by a very low, single strand wire fence - not to keep animals out, but to keep people in. Animals wander past while you're having a gin and tonic, so keep your camera close.

For the OP - yes, Africa is addictive so don't count on only needing a long lens for this one trip. Why not buy a lens - new or used - and resell on your return if you feel you won't need it again - but I'll bet you keep it. :)

Take it from me - as much as you are looking forward to this trip and however high your expectations - it will blow your socks off and you'll want to go back.

PS. Don't forget the people and the wonderfully coloured and varied birdlife and the landscape itself, especially early morn and evening.
Vic.
That's pretty obvious. But if the horizon is covered with vehicles doing the same thing as you are doing, how do you get pictures with no vehicles in them?
--
It's all about light.
 
Be very careful about buying the 80-400 VR. I bought one just for my Africa trip and was going to sell it as soon as I got back home. However, it has become one of my favorite lenses and, of course, I still have it. All of the bad things you read about it are somewhat true. But, in my esperience, they are not nearly as true as folks would have you believe. It is slightly soft at the long end, but f8 helps a lot. It focuses slower than a 70-200 AFS and louder, but it is not too slow nor to loud to capture great moments. But, most importantly, I could not find a better, less expensive way to get to 400mm. Also, it is not as heavy nor as long when being carried as the 70-200. I put it on my, then, D2hs and I put the 24-85 on my then, D50 and never changed lenses. I wish I could make the trip again with my D3s, but, such is life.
--
Chuck Currey
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top