best camera for close up jewelry photography

isajul

New member
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
HI

I have been using a nikon coolpix 2500 (2002) for taking close up pictures of my jewelry. It is dying (pictures are way over exposed, almost all white with even a little background light).

Anyway, I need a replacement, can't spend a ton of money. don't know if i should just get a point and shoot with good close up feature or get a digital slr (entry level). Any specific camera suggestions would be appreciated.
thanks
donna
 
What you need depends on how you are using the photos. If it is for showing the jewelry online, a P&S is fine; any extra detail from a better camera, DSLR or otherwise, would be lost. It is helpful to get a compact that has some manual control, but not completely necessary.
 
thanks for your reply. mostly i use the pics online, HOWEVER, i would sometimes like to get some of them blown up into 2ft poster size. what are some p&s with manual options? any brand better at macro than others?
 
Donna, I have no idea as to the quality of your jewelry. It might be $3 beads or designer rings. I don't know if you sell them online, at ebay or need pamphets for Jewelry stores. I do know one thing though. If you care enough, hire a professional who knows what they're doing with the right kind of lighting to really show off your product, to light it up so to speak.

I really doubt you'll take my advice, but it might pay to consider it seriously. You wouldn't expect a professional photographer to create your jewelry would you? I don't think you can take professional enough images to display your work. Maybe you can come up with a trade-out. I'd not hire the friend next door with their shiney new dslr. I'd get an established professional.
--
Cheers, Craig

Equipment in Plan via Profile
 
A friend of mine just made a lightbox for doing this. Took a cardboard box about 2' by 1' by 1' and cut out most of the sides. Covered those cutouts with parchment paper and put the jewelry inside. Cut a small hole in the one end that didn't have the parchment paper to insert the lens through. He lit the lightbox with bright lights outside the lightbox, but inside the box the light is soft. The result is a very nice high key photo of the jewelry that doesn't have any reflections. I was impressed. I believe he said he got the idea off Strobist?

--
-Kevin
 
Hi, My jewelry is artisan style sterling silver jewelry that I have been making for 12 year and I do use professional photographers for my jury slides to get into shows. course. But when i want to update my website or put something on etsy I just take them myself and they are actually pretty good. I take several every few days and at $65 a pop for a pro, just can't do that.
thanks
 
Yes, I use a light box for my photos.

does anyone have a recommendation for a basic camera that takes good macro pictures?
thanks again
 
Yes, I use a light box for my photos.

does anyone have a recommendation for a basic camera that takes good macro pictures?
Your dying CP2500 was a very limited, basic camera that had no manual modes and only a 2mp sensor. Almost any halfway decent P&S camera should do as well, and since your reason for looking for another camera isn't that you felt that the CP2500 was limiting you in any way . . . you are in a good position. There are very nice P&S cameras and entry level DSLRs that could produce better product photos than you were getting, but a good product photographer could also produce better photos using the same CP2500 (one that's working properly though). I think that your best bet is to get any competent P&S camera that has manual exposure controls (does P,A,S,M sound familiar?). You can even save money by getting a used or refurbished camera. Whatever you get, for shooting at the odd angles that are sometimes needed for product photography, getting a camera with a tilt/swivel LCD display can be advantageous, and the same goes for a flash hot shoe. With that and a really good book that shows how to use light effectively you'll soon be producing much better photos than ever before. This book is widely considered the be the classic :







It'll take a good bit of time and effort to learn everything that the book has to teach, but the good news is that there's no need to learn it all. Just choose the parts that are relevant to what you want to do and keep the book as a reference, if and when you want to go further at some later date. Here's a short and a longer introductory quote from a couple of reviews :
I have just finished reading Light: Science & Magic (for the second time) and (again) I can not calm down. It took me a week and I spent every almost every waking hour reading it. Let me share the joy I had with you.

In general, Light: Science & Magic tells you everything you need to know about photography lighting. And the stuff it doesn't tell you, it tells you how to figure out yourself.
http://www.diyphotography.net/light-science-and-magic-a-book-review

I browsed through a few books on lighting and flash photography, but found them mostly useless: lots of vague generalizations and spiffy portrait examples, yet I still was mystified as to how flash and studio lighting really worked. It all seemed like black magic.

Light: Science & Magic decodes the mystery. It's easy to overlook on the shelf at your local B&N or Borders; the cover illustration is a little odd, and it lacks the splashy large photos other lighting books are filled with. But it's a brilliantly logical and straightforward introduction to studio/portrait lighting for beginners, standing head and shoulders above anything else I've seen.

The introductory chapter outlines lighting as the "language of photography," and identifies three basic principles that organize everything else. These are: the critical rôle of the apparent size of your light source, the three types of surface reflection that determine the appearance of your subject, and the concept of the "family of angles" that control direct reflections. The remainder of the book fleshes out and organizes these principles into a kind of mental "toolkit" for lighting anything. The authors emphasize that photographic styles and fads come and go but the tools remain constant. They also advise the reader to learn and grow with the gear you already have, before rushing out to buy more toys.

The second chapter present a commendably clear description of the physical nature and behavior of light, and its interactions with objects, as it pertains to photography. You'd think this would be obvious stuff, but the clarity and logical rigor of the discussion were very...er, enlightening. Subsequent chapters delve into the details of the three types of reflection (diffuse, direct, glare) and provide the most comprehensible description of polarization I have ever seen. The discussion is accompanied by simple, lucid diagrams that illustrate the concepts nicely.
Mike adds : I don't want to step on Geoff's toes—he decides what he wants to review, and of course what he wants to say—but Light: Science and Magic also happens to be the basic lighting text I've been recommending for years. It's included in the chapter called "Technical Books" in my book about cameras and lenses , Lenses and the Light-Tight Box.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/01/light-science-and-magic-book-review.html
 
http://desc.shop.ebay.com/Digital-Cameras-/31388/i.html?LH_TitleDesc=1&_nkw=Olympus+c8080wz&_catref=1&_fln=1&_trksid=p3286.c0.m282
--
The Amateur Formerly Known as ' UZ'pShoot'ERS ' 'Happy Shootin'! Comments, Critique, Ridicule, Limericks, Jokes, Hi-jackings, EnthUZIastically, Encouraged... I Insist!



* rrawzz'at'gmail'dot'com * http://www.pbase.com/rrawzz *
Tz5aLx3Fz50Fz30C8080wzE100rsC2100uz
 
thanks, Bill, for your thoughtful answer. You are right that I had the bare minimum of a camera before, so anything will be better. I am thinking about the Nikon coolpix L110. For my purposes I think it will be good. The book recommendation is welcomed also.
donna
 
thanks, I will check out the Olympus.
It's an 8mp rather large sensor for non-DSLR Oldie-but-a-Goodie, with one of the sharpest fast Wide angle lenses to ever grace a full featured prosumer enthusiast cam that excels at macro\close-up photography & along with those excellent Oly colors, it has a very good JPG engine so you don't have to resort to shooting Raw..

I have several cameras with the little used 8080 being one & if I were doing what you are lookin' to do. I would dedicate my 8080 to the task but it's not an image stabilized nor a particularly fast operation cam so I'd recommend putting it on a tripod & using the remote to actuate the shutter.. It's not a pocket cam & is built like a tank & for $300 or preferably less, would be a decent deal..
--
The Amateur Formerly Known as ' UZ'pShoot'ERS ' 'Happy Shootin'! Comments, Critique, Ridicule, Limericks, Jokes, Hi-jackings, EnthUZIastically, Encouraged... I Insist!



* rrawzz'at'gmail'dot'com * http://www.pbase.com/rrawzz *
Tz5aLx3Fz50Fz30C8080wzE100rsC2100uz
 
I'd suggest looking at the Pany Lumix DMC-ZS5. It should easily handle your close-up requirements and a lot more for around $200US.

When answering these types of questions I always like to add that lighting is more important than the camera.

A. C.

--
I've taken a vow of poverty. To annoy me send money.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top