Effects of a Polarizer on snow?

cg_25

Active member
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Does anyone have any examples of using a circular polarizer on snow, in particular landscape shots? I'd be interested to see the effects as I do not currently own a CP.
 
Very nice.

I'm thinking about buying a single 77mm filter with stepping rings. That way I don't need to buy a filter for each of my lenses. I guess the only disadvantage is some lens hoods might not fit.
 
Very nice.

I'm thinking about buying a single 77mm filter with stepping rings. That way I don't need to buy a filter for each of my lenses. I guess the only disadvantage is some lens hoods might not fit.
That's what I did. The filter itself provides a slight bit of extra protection against glare, which seems to be increased a little more by using a step-up ring (where there is also zero chance of vignetting, so there is a tradeoff that's not entirely negative).
 

Does anyone have any examples of using a circular polarizer on snow, in particular landscape shots? I'd be interested to see the effects as I do not currently own a CP.
--
Like others here, I suffer from GAS.
Gear Acquisition Syndrome.
a few hundred nautical miles SW : 17º 52S, 149º 56W
 
I forgot to mention to go lightly using a CP in high altitudes otherwise the sky might go black in your picture.

Regards
Does anyone have any examples of using a circular polarizer on snow, in particular landscape shots? I'd be interested to see the effects as I do not currently own a CP.
--
Like others here, I suffer from GAS.
Gear Acquisition Syndrome.
a few hundred nautical miles SW : 17º 52S, 149º 56W
 
I don't like step up or down rinds .

BUT if you are going to use them , buy at list 2 of each size [ they can bend and warp ] buy all at same time - . The shipping is generally more than the cost of ring .
When you order also order a rubber collapsible hood .
You pop in one section and it is easier to adjust CPL .

If you have any really cheap filters , store the rings in those cases . The out side threads are OK but the inside ones like to collect dust .
--
1st - it's a hobby

XTI - gripped , Canon - efs 10-22 , efs 17-55 , efs 18-55 IS , 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS , 35-350L ,Quantaray lens 70-300 macro , life size converter , KSM filters for all , kenko auto tubes , EF 25 , 7D , 70-200 MK II IS , 2X III
 
I mostly shoot snow without polarizer since it in my view kills the winter feeling with the beautiful glittering in the snow.
But thats just me...

Br

Marcus

--
5D mk2
Sigma 12-24 HSM EX
50 f/1,2L
85 f/1,2L
100 macro IS f/2,8L
24-105 IS f/4L
70-200 IS f/2,8L
70-300 IS f/4-5.6 L
Canon EF 2x II Extender
Canon EF 25 II Extension tube
Speedlite 580
MT-24EX
BG-E6

http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcusaxlund/
 
I'm another who prefers not to use them in snowy conditions - when I've done side by side comparisons I've always preferred the ones without. In fact, whatever the conditions, I only use a CPL when I think I really 'need' it. Here's a few examples of ones with no CPL (sorry don't think I have any with) but I hope it shows you that you can get good results without! ;-)









--
Lizzie
----------------------------------
http://www.lizzieshepherd.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lizzieshepherd
 
Thanks for the advice. I'll probably purchase one eventually, I just wanted to see if there were any clear advantages to using one in snowy conditions.
 
Actually, if you use a CP with a clear blue sky from somewhere around 25mm or wider, there will be a good chance that part of the sky will be darker and not be "even". I learned this the hard way.

Kent
 
Thanks for the advice. I'll probably purchase one eventually, I just wanted to see if there were any clear advantages to using one in snowy conditions.
Here are a with and without for you from Sunny and Snowy Ohio today. First shot with , second without. I have a Kaesemann MRC Circular Polarizer. Taken with my 17-55.







 
The 2 shots above show the ND of the cpl .

If you look at the shadow of the silo , the ND effect would have been more by turning camera a little more towards the sun .
--
1st - it's a hobby

XTI - gripped , Canon - efs 10-22 , efs 17-55 , efs 18-55 IS , 28-90 , 28 @ 2.8 , 50 @1.8 , 28-135 IS , 35-350L ,Quantaray lens 70-300 macro , life size converter , KSM filters for all , kenko auto tubes , EF 25 , 7D , 70-200 MK II IS , 2X III
 
I don't like step up or down rinds .

BUT if you are going to use them , buy at list 2 of each size [ they can bend and warp ] buy all at same time - .
or ... buy good quality brass rings and not have to worry about them sticking together or bending / warping. They also are more compatible with high quality fillters that have brass construction. If you are going to pay $$$ for a high end filter, do yourself a favor and get brass stepping rings.
 
Don't bother with hoods when using a polarizer - you need to be able to rotate the polarizer - hoods get in the way.
Very nice.

I'm thinking about buying a single 77mm filter with stepping rings. That way I don't need to buy a filter for each of my lenses. I guess the only disadvantage is some lens hoods might not fit.
--
Some cool cats that can use your help
http://www.wildlife-sanctuary.org

Even if you can't donate, please help spread the word.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top