RPP 4.1.3: several films emulations added

[Mark Smith145430]

I know it isn't I was not even asking to open source it. I was merely offering my services as a Windows developer.

Might be impossible to port, if it uses the Apple OS X inbuilt raw profiles.....

 

[Alexey.Danilchenko]

Might be impossible to port, if it uses the Apple OS X inbuilt raw profiles.....

It doesn't...

 

[The Davinator]

Might be impossible to port, if it uses the Apple OS X inbuilt raw profiles.....

It doesn't...

Then if they're looking for donations for support, it would make sense to have a PC release.

 

[Iliah Borg]

if they're looking for donations for support

Donations are not for support; they indicate interest and appreciation.

--
http://www.libraw.org/

 

[Mark Smith145430]

Shame. No offense Iliah, but keeping the software from over 90% of computer users doesn't seem like a logical decision. Shame...because I'd give it a try.

Possibly 90% of computers in general but not 90% of photographers.

There are a few of Mac only photo programs, and some hardware-Sinar backs are only available for Mac if my memory is correct.

 

[MusicmanUK]

I've been having a lot of fun with RPP over the last few days since your original post.

I'm particularly partial to the K64 emulation.

Many thanks from a happy photographer

--
http://www.cybertects.co.uk/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cybertect

 

[Iliah Borg]

Thank you very much!

--
http://www.libraw.org/

 

[headofdestiny]

Thanks, the film emulations look great. Donation sent

 

[CWilt]

Glad to see others who appreciate RPP and the work that Andrey and Iliah have done.


--
Charles
My family images are at http://www.stakeman.smugmug.com
Be sure of your subject.
Never, force the shot.

 

[lovEU]

Glad to see others who appreciate RPP and the work that Andrey and Iliah have done.

I got one of those as well, recently ;-)

The TrueFilm simulation is a cool thing - it takes a lot of time to get the same look manually, at least for me. And I like what I get from using V50 or A100F for many scenes.
--
regards, eric

 

[Raul]

"big" raw processors to have lazy people working on them. (or indiferent?)

 

[CWilt]

I got one of those as well, recently ;-)

The TrueFilm simulation is a cool thing - it takes a lot of time to get the same look manually, at least for me. And I like what I get from using V50 or A100F for many scenes.

It does cut a lot of time from post work. I use A100 for portraits, AX25 for black and white, and K64 for almost everything.
--
Charles
My family images are at http://www.stakeman.smugmug.com
Be sure of your subject.
Never, force the shot.

 

[The Davinator]

"big" raw processors to have lazy people working on them. (or indiferent?)

As the "big" raw processors work on my PC, I'd say it's equally lazy to have the processor only available to one computer system.

 

[Iliah Borg]

it's equally lazy to have the processor only available to one computer system.

Sharing with others what was done for yourself is not lazy by any definition.

--
http://www.libraw.org/

 

[lovEU]

It does cut a lot of time from post work. I use A100 for portraits, AX25 for black and white, and K64 for almost everything.

I yet have to try with portraits, so I'm curious to see what A100 will do. Btw, interesting to see different preferences.
--
regards, eric

 

[MusicmanUK]

I'll take that up with the author of RawTherapee for you if you like, as it only runs on Windows.

Cut him some slack. It's donation-ware.

--
http://www.cybertects.co.uk/

 

[The Davinator]

I'll take that up with the author of RawTherapee for you if you like, as it only runs on Windows.

Cut him some slack. It's donation-ware.

--
http://www.cybertects.co.uk/

If you want donations, I'd go after the 94% of the market instead of the 6%.

Oh, and can't Macs run Windows software?

 

[lovEU]

If you want donations, I'd go after the 94% of the market instead of the 6%.

It's not always about money...

About the "laziness" - you somehow sound like your understanding of being "lazy" is that someone isn't functioning of your purpose ;-)

Oh, and can't Macs run Windows software?

That's one reason why I as a current Windows-only user is going to buy a Mac mini mainly for running RPP.
--
regards, eric

 

[Iliah Borg]

Oh, and can't Macs run Windows software?

Vice versa is true too.

--
http://www.libraw.org/

 

[CWilt]

I'd go after the 94% of the market instead of the 6%.

Then you should spend your time trying to write your own. You are wasting your time trying to convince them to do it your way.

Oh, and can't Macs run Windows software?

... and vice versa too.

--
Charles
My family images are at http://www.stakeman.smugmug.com
Be sure of your subject.
Never, force the shot.