Bye Bye Canon!

Schnake

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
329
Reaction score
3
Location
AU
Very disappointing line up from Canon!! The fact that the G11 has no HD is a start.... S90 looked promising.... but again today’s competition has HD. They managed HD and wide(r) range lens on the SD980IS so why not put that into the S90....

Obviously Canon aren't getting the picture! (so to speak)
 
Obviously Canon aren't getting the picture! (so to speak)
Well I think they DID get the picture and hit it right on the head. They just did not include video. There are plenty of middle of the road P&S out there doing video.

--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
 
And a lot of movie cameras for those who are going crazy about video being or not being on a camera.
--

 
HD video is critical. Canon's inability to include this feature on the G11 and S90 boggles the mind. It makes zero sense. Sadly they make no effort to explain either.
 
Bye.
 
For folks like me who are mainly interested in still photography those two cameras are just fine. Please tell me why video is so importasnt to you.
--
Jerry
 
that everyone was complaining that now cameras had to have video at the expense of still quality?
--
Mac
 
I think Canon should be applauded for listening to its customers at last.

We've got a G11 with a flip-out LCD and fewer MP. Isn't that just what we all wanted? The video won't be important for most.

Not only that, but we've got the S90 at last, and with an f2.0 lens! And RAW. Who cares about HD video on that? Well, if you do, it'll come on the next iteration no doubt. For now, I thin we should be happy with two great new cameras.

Oh and there's an Ixus with a truly w/a lens too! It's like Christmas isn't it? Why is everyone still moaning?

--
Androo
http://Androo.smugmug.com
 
If you cannot make a still photo "move", then that is the reason.
For folks like me who are mainly interested in still photography those two cameras are just fine. Please tell me why video is so importasnt to you.
--
Jerry
 
It has video but not HD. If Canon take away video, then I may respect this decision. However, putting an old video format in the camera is just simply a marketing decision.

"Get the picture"? I think you might have said Canon "get the picture" when there is no RAW in G7 and no rotatable LCD in both G7 and G9. May be your meaning of "get the picture" is putting it in the next G model, to ensure the next one can has enough 'new' features?
Obviously Canon aren't getting the picture! (so to speak)
Well I think they DID get the picture and hit it right on the head. They just did not include video. There are plenty of middle of the road P&S out there doing video.

--
Greg Gebhardt in
Jacksonville, Florida
 
We've got a G11 with a flip-out LCD and fewer MP. Isn't that just what we all wanted?
Exactly what a lot of us wanted.
The video won't be important for most.
The only time I've used video with my G3, G6, and now G9 is when I accidently bumped the mode dial and walked around taking good quality video of the ground and sky.
Why is everyone still moaning?
Because that's apparently what some of the people here do best. :)

Tom
 
Canon is offering consumers a choice. The G11 is intended for those looking for top-grade still-image quality in a compact camera and the SX1 is there for those who are keen on shooting top-grade video and use a still-camera form factor to do it with.

I would expect that soon enough, though not right now, Canon will release a follow-up to the SX1 that will offer enhancements to still performance, etc. by following a similar route to the G series update only with a CMOS sensor that will, unfortunately trade off superior video performance with a less impressive still capability. Still, for video purposes, there is no value to having a sensor push all that hard to cram in more resolution. For stills, for that matter, I think 10MP is plenty. My 30D is an 8MP camera and it produces marvelous prints even when blowing the image up quite a ways.

I know we want it all and some day Canon and its competitors will deliver. But it's not going to happen right away. Some refining has to happen and I'm sure it will.

Still, not everybody is worried about high-grade HD video and for those people the G11 looks to be a rather impressive product. I'm betting the image quality is going to blow a lot of folks away. Next year, or maybe the year after, Canon will take the SX1 successor to new, equally impressive heights.

I'm sure, also, that the hybrid DSLRs are going to get progressively better both in terms of results (still and video) and controls in video mode.

Really, the most important aspect of the G11 is the decision to reverse the trend of progressively increasing megapixels, all but eliminating gains made in sensor design that should have yielded IQ advancements. Now, hopefully, as Canon and other manufacturers make progress in designing those sensors, the gains will go not to generating more impressive pixel count but rather more impressive photos and video. Let's hope the new Canons are sales successes because if they are, it will encourage a shift away from cramming in more resolution at the expense of IQ.
 
Very disappointing line up from Canon!! The fact that the G11 has no HD is a start.... S90 looked promising.... but again today’s competition has HD. They managed HD and wide(r) range lens on the SD980IS so why not put that into the S90....

Obviously Canon aren't getting the picture! (so to speak)
No, I think Canon are getting the picture! The still picture . Seriously, video is great, but i don't find HD to necessarily be a must. I have a Panasonic FZ28, and I do occassionally shoot video on it, but not HD. I'm just not into video. I'm into taking photos. And it's nice that Canon is still making cameras for people like me.

So regular video is fine for me. I just don't know why everything has to be HD these days. It's like the megapixel craze, where people thought they had to have more and more megapixels.
 
So regular video is fine for me. I just don't know why everything has to be HD these days.
Because shaky handheld home videos with look so much better in HD. For the overwhelming majority of people HD video is just like buying a state of the art personal computer, which they then use just for Web surfing and MS Office: nearly all of that power and capability is completely wasted.
 
Very disappointing line up from Canon!! The fact that the G11 has no HD is a start.... S90 looked promising.... but again today’s competition has HD. They managed HD and wide(r) range lens on the SD980IS so why not put that into the S90....

Obviously Canon aren't getting the picture! (so to speak)
Obviously Canon aren't making G11 for you, sorry~
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top