Chris Mak
Senior Member
Ok,
I think it's become clear that my newly aquired 35-100 f2 lens is not performing at the level I expected based on my (very positive) experiences with the 14-35.
What's wrong?
I'm trying to come to conclusions and perhaps other owners of this lens can help.
The case is that my (world-wide) warranty runs until november, and I think I'm going to have to decide whether I will be sending the lens to Olympus, possibly with my E3, which I dread, as It's working absolutely fine with the 14-35 f2.
It seems ironic: after having read all the focus issues with the 14-35, but not having the least of trouble myself, I should now run into problems with my other lens-wish: the much praised 35-100.
So what's wrong?
In short (look at the pictures below): at F2-f2.8 I simply cánnot get decent Auto focus with this lens at the long end. I suspect it to italics/consistently/italics back-focus, as proper focus is aquired by counterclockwise turning the focusring bold*two*bold stages, in SAF + MF mode. (owners will be familiar with the tiny stages when operating manual focus correction).
What I would want to establish is:
-is the lens faulty?
-is it more likely that the camera is faulty?
-will aquiring the HLD-4 improve into proper Auto focus performance wide at large apertures at the long end?
-On basis of your experience with the 35-100 under similar circumstances: is it worthwile sending the lens in (or: can it consistently perform better?)
I purchased this lens for concert(portrait)photography in low light, so need better af, because the lens is never anywhere near as sharp as my 14-35.
Any help will greatly be apreciated, I've already contacted Olympus, but they dont seem eager to help.
Below shots: first:auto focus without manual correction, second: with manual corr.
Both at approx. 65% viewing, taken at f2.8 100mm
Chris
I think it's become clear that my newly aquired 35-100 f2 lens is not performing at the level I expected based on my (very positive) experiences with the 14-35.
What's wrong?
I'm trying to come to conclusions and perhaps other owners of this lens can help.
The case is that my (world-wide) warranty runs until november, and I think I'm going to have to decide whether I will be sending the lens to Olympus, possibly with my E3, which I dread, as It's working absolutely fine with the 14-35 f2.
It seems ironic: after having read all the focus issues with the 14-35, but not having the least of trouble myself, I should now run into problems with my other lens-wish: the much praised 35-100.
So what's wrong?
In short (look at the pictures below): at F2-f2.8 I simply cánnot get decent Auto focus with this lens at the long end. I suspect it to italics/consistently/italics back-focus, as proper focus is aquired by counterclockwise turning the focusring bold*two*bold stages, in SAF + MF mode. (owners will be familiar with the tiny stages when operating manual focus correction).
What I would want to establish is:
-is the lens faulty?
-is it more likely that the camera is faulty?
-will aquiring the HLD-4 improve into proper Auto focus performance wide at large apertures at the long end?
-On basis of your experience with the 35-100 under similar circumstances: is it worthwile sending the lens in (or: can it consistently perform better?)
I purchased this lens for concert(portrait)photography in low light, so need better af, because the lens is never anywhere near as sharp as my 14-35.
Any help will greatly be apreciated, I've already contacted Olympus, but they dont seem eager to help.
Below shots: first:auto focus without manual correction, second: with manual corr.
Both at approx. 65% viewing, taken at f2.8 100mm
Chris